Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Маквала в продуктовом

Channel

Маквала в продуктовом

@Wtfisdigital

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

401subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001352441353
TypeChannel
Username@Wtfisdigital
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Wtfisdigital

Growth

400401400.57 August 2026 — 400 subscribers8 August 2026 — 400 subscribers15 August 2026 — 401 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 400–401 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 08:07401+1
8 Aug 2026, 05:48400no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:01400first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 10 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.7%
avg views ÷ 401 subscribers
Avg views / post
103
1 post measured
Reaction rate
24.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held11 (10 January 20265 August 2026)
Views total103
Reactions total25
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
48s
Average length
48s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

262 reactions across 10 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11343.1%
🔥8432.1%
👍218.02%
103.82%
🤩62.29%
👏51.91%
🤝51.91%
💘41.53%
🐳31.15%
😁31.15%
😘31.15%
🥰31.15%
🍓10.382%
🤣10.382%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 262reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 10 January 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 11 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Wtfisdigital. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 January 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC103 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

История, которая стала интересней после выхода Одиссеи Нолана В детстве каким-то чудом посмотрела «Одиссею» Кончаловского (она, конечно, не для деток, но у меня в семье если сцены 18+ внутри чего-то приличного, то можно 😂). Я отлично запомнила невероятно красивую Афину, секси-Одиссея, Пенелопу и Ментора (конкретно слово ментор, оно ж из этого мифа и пошло, типа, учитель). Секси-Одиссея играл Арманд Ассанте (это имя

🔥177🍓1

13 Jul 2026, 06:13 UTC183 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @improvstudioruPhoto

Импровизация или стендап? Что лучше? Или идеальный вариант - это микс двух комедийных жанров? Давайте выясним в новом выпуске комедийного шоу "Импров против Стендапа", где вы увидите стендап-монологи и импров-сцены на их основе! ▶️ СМОТРЕТЬ НА ЮТЬЮБ https://youtu.be/LXmz6njHmBI ▶️ СМОТРЕТЬ В ВК https://vk.com/improvstudio?w=wall-67973824_13301 А если тоже хочешь научиться импровизировать, приходи к нам на бесплатны

6🔥5😘3

4 Jun 2026, 07:29 UTC326 views46 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В 2021 году моя нога впервые вступила на стендап-сцену, и примерно в тот же момент она впервые попала на открытый микрофон (до этого я думала, что путь в стендапе это "ты смешно шутишь - тебя берут на ТНТ") Так вот, когда я впервые увидела открытый микрофон, то комики мне показались полубогами, потому что они смешно шутили, делились интересным и хорошо держались на сцене, то ведущий был просто бог - с этой импровиза

🔥22👍14🤩6💘4

13 May 2026, 07:07 UTC376 views44 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Не прошло и года! Наконец-то у меня появилась, ссылка, где можно посмотреть мое выступление)) Эгоистично нарезала только свои кусочки из эфира (сама, в капкате!) и страшно довольна собой https://youtu.be/j8MIUtGsZ3w?is=2IUXkZ6nUj86ySu2

25🔥15🐳3🤣1

6 Apr 2026, 05:50 UTC421 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Утро понедельника - время послушать хорошие новости!

65

6 Apr 2026, 05:50 UTC365 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @khabarovcomicsPhoto

Кстати, в подкасте, кроме нас и гостя можно услышать комментарии ученого, который работает над таблеткой от джетлага, и спортивной журналистки, освещающей соревнования капибар. Выпуск можно послушать по ссылке

🔥643

12 Mar 2026, 18:04 UTC461 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @smehosomatikaPhoto

Вчера по приглашению друга и организатора интереснейшего мероприятия, Алексея Безымянного, наша команда «Ильинская больница/Смехосоматика» приняла участие в игре «Что? Где? Когда?», ведущим которой был Максим Поташев. 10 команд по 6 человек, представлявших различные клиники Москвы! Очень много знакомых лиц, друзей, коллег! Прекрасная дружеская обстановка с духом здорового соперничества. За каждым столом сидел секрет

16🔥6👏4👍2

10 Mar 2026, 16:52 UTC389 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В прошлый раз, когда я просила друзей и знакомых заполнить мне такой опросник, это круто поменяло мою жизнь, пожалуйста, не проходите мимо и ответьте на несколько вопросов Для тех, кто хочет анонимности - ссылка Для смелых, ловких и умелых - можете в комментариях Можно отвечать не на все вопросы, можно писать свое, можно все короче, кайфуйте, жизнь одна. Вопросы: - Если бы тебя спросили, кто такой(-ая) (ваше имя)

6🔥6🥰32😁1

4 Mar 2026, 18:14 UTC319 viewsread 8 August 2026

Макс - крутой автор и ужасный авторитет для меня, я его боюсь еще со времен кастинга Стендап Лиги. Я кстати боюсь с ним писать, потому что ужасно сыплюсь перед авторитетами, но мне как раз надо это проработать))

4 Mar 2026, 18:14 UTC358 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @hudoimaxPhoto

Доброго времени суток! Новый месяц, новый праздник, новый розыгрыш разгонов. На этот раз приурочу все это дело к женскому дню, а значит участвовать могут только ДАМЫ! Количество участников не сильно упадет, реноме комфортного автора эмпата позволяет не волноваться на этот счёт🤭 Главный приз, по традиции - час разгонов со мной. Потом будет два приза по полчаса разгона, и давайте ещё пару призов разыграю и назову уж

4

10 Jan 2026, 13:08 UTC738 views59 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Главный урок 2025 года Помимо классического «не надо планировать то, что ты не собираешься делать» (с этим более-менее справилась), есть ещё более неприятное правило - надо перестать планировать то, что ты не сможешь сделать. Я - очень неэнергичный человек. Со стороны может казаться иначе, потому что у меня выступления, основная работа, куча обучений и еще каких-то проектов. Но я знаю людей, которые объективно гораз

39🔥7👍5🤝5😁2👏1

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @Wtfisdigital. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Маквала в продуктовом” (@Wtfisdigital), 401 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Wtfisdigital.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.