Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ₊˚ ʜᴇʟᴇɴ.ᴛɪꜰꜰ ✧ ゚. /переезд/

Channel

₊˚ ʜᴇʟᴇɴ.ᴛɪꜰꜰ ✧ ゚. /переезд/

@WoofHeleneoeoei

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

85subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002460318051
TypeChannel
Username@WoofHeleneoeoei
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/WoofHeleneoeoei

Growth

8510 Aug 2026, 23:46 — 85 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 12:46 — 85 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 23:4611 Aug 2026, 12:46
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 84–86 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 12:4685no change
10 Aug 2026, 23:4685first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 1 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
88.5%
avg views ÷ 85 subscribers
Avg views / post
75.2
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held16 (1 April 202610 August 2026)
Views total677
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 23:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

184 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54386410144640726365731.0%
custom 54205091614839406375529.9%
custom 53011901295729304793619.6%
custom 5390948520788255569189.78%
custom 5424839287382235244137.07%
custom 530985676798586725852.72%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 184reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @WoofHeleneoeoei. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 April 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC25 viewsread 10 August 2026

❤ напоминаю про переезд ласт тайм, там 2 нови арта 😌

31 Jul 2026, 15:49 UTC62 viewsread 10 August 2026

❤ 30 сахарков переехало, у остальных как дела? 👅 🌷там кстати артик нови небольшой 😴😴

28 Jul 2026, 16:57 UTC65 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @chikibrikynabutilke

некогда на душевную речь, давно хотела с чистого листа начать, делаем переезд, делаем мясо, люблю, целую🤩 @st4pidk1d @st4pidk1d @st4pidk1d

25 Jul 2026, 15:41 UTC87 viewsread 10 August 2026

❤ кста, ПЕРЕЕЗД!!!!! 😡 @WoofHelen @WoofHelen @WoofHelen

22 Jul 2026, 12:33 UTC99 views0 reactions5 Starsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @Narc15susPhoto

Хиппи Бëздей тю ми Очень ленивый рисунок ..

18 Jul 2026, 19:22 UTC119 viewsread 10 August 2026

❤ что-то я скоро нарисую и это будут бейбики 🎀

6 Jun 2026, 17:12 UTC688 views43 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

❤переезд окончен, так что покажу что собралось у меня за последний месяц! 🤫 🌷я слишком сильно углубилась в личную жизнь, что забыла себя и хобби… так что пора не только мечтать делать мерч, а серьезно сесть за него и подать пару заявок на маркеты 🐶

custom 530119012957293047921custom 543864101446407263611custom 54205091614839406377custom 53909485207882555693custom 53098567679858672581

9 May 2026, 01:23 UTC216 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @gfhj564fghgjfPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 54248392873822352447custom 54205091614839406373

3 May 2026, 07:59 UTC696 views33 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

❤ раз в месяц и тётя Хелен рисует, ну, правда, если проснется 😡 🌷 смысла в картинках не ищите, его как всегда нет… пока что 😨

custom 542050916148394063716custom 54386410144640726368custom 54248392873822352445custom 53011901295729304792custom 53098567679858672581custom 53909485207882555691

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @WoofHeleneoeoei. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 340,619 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“₊˚ ʜᴇʟᴇɴ.ᴛɪꜰꜰ ✧ ゚. /переезд/” (@WoofHeleneoeoei), 85 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WoofHeleneoeoei.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.