Аято жжёт вдвойне #Аято
custom 53304909032723874725❤2custom 52088076593686324451custom 52695934553355819051custom 52828181363813405891custom 53189485050818810141custom 53665799801573501451custom 53931464445321761491
Signed ☾ ⛧ 𓃦 𝑩𝒆л𝒃ıй 𝑲л𝒃ıк 𓄈 ⛧ ☽

Channel
@WolfPackWild
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
83subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001979252593 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @WolfPackWild |
| Description | Здᴩᴀʙᴄᴛʙуй! Ꭲы ᴨᴏᴨᴀᴧ нᴀ ᴋᴀнᴀᴧ ᴛʙᴏᴩчᴇᴄᴛʙᴀ Ꮯᴛᴀи Ꮾᴧᴀᴦᴏᴩᴏдных. Инɸᴏ: https://t.me/+Dora81UxJIRmMTli Ꮾуᴄᴛ: https://t.me/boost/WolfPackWild Пᴏ ᴨᴏʙᴏду ʙᴄᴛуᴨᴧᴇния: @zNessie |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/WolfPackWild |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:00 | 83 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:51 | 83 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 84 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (29 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 334 |
| Reactions total | 127 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
127 reactions across 9 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5330490903272387472 | 29 | 22.8% | |
| custom 5269593455335581905 | 28 | 22.0% | |
| custom 5402420056313317908 | 19 | 15.0% | |
| custom 5208807659368632445 | 15 | 11.8% | |
| custom 5393146444532176149 | 9 | 7.09% | |
| custom 5366548437917526534 | 8 | 6.30% | |
| custom 5366579980157350145 | 8 | 6.30% | |
| custom 5318948505081881014 | 7 | 5.51% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 2.36% | |
| custom 5282818136381340589 | 1 | 0.787% |
Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 127reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Аято жжёт вдвойне #Аято
custom 53304909032723874725❤2custom 52088076593686324451custom 52695934553355819051custom 52828181363813405891custom 53189485050818810141custom 53665799801573501451custom 53931464445321761491
Signed ☾ ⛧ 𓃦 𝑩𝒆л𝒃ıй 𝑲л𝒃ıк 𓄈 ⛧ ☽
Аято жжет #Аято
custom 52695934553355819058custom 53304909032723874723custom 54024200563133179082custom 52088076593686324451custom 53665799801573501451custom 53931464445321761491
Signed ⓘ• 𝗠𝗿. 𝗡𝗲𝘀𝗾𝘂𝗶𝗸
Сано увольняется Мне слишком лень шота делать, опоздал снова. Та и не строшки на этот раз. Все картинки мне кидали в лс, так что никто не знает, что друг у друга. Сюрпризик А ЕЩО У ДИНА С АКИРОЙ СЕГОДНЯ ДЕНЬ РОЖДЕНИЯ, ЕЕЕ #ГосподинСано
custom 54024200563133179088custom 52088076593686324452custom 53304909032723874722custom 52695934553355819051custom 53189485050818810141custom 53665799801573501451custom 53931464445321761491
Signed ༻🪭° 𝘀𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗵𝗼𝗼𝘂𝘀 ˆ𐃷ˆ
Прекрасные работы от Калибри, и момент из ролки от Аято. #Калибри #Аято
custom 53304909032723874725custom 53665484379175265343custom 52088076593686324451custom 52695934553355819051custom 53189485050818810141custom 53665799801573501451custom 53931464445321761491custom 54024200563133179081
Signed ☾ ⛧ 𓃦 𝑩𝒆л𝒃ıй 𝑲л𝒃ıк 𓄈 ⛧ ☽
На дворе уже август.. Быстро время летит, однако #Калибри
custom 52088076593686324455custom 53665484379175265343custom 52695934553355819051custom 53189485050818810141custom 53304909032723874721custom 53665799801573501451custom 53931464445321761491custom 54024200563133179081
Signed ☾ ⛧ 𓃦 𝑩𝒆л𝒃ıй 𝑲л𝒃ıк 𓄈 ⛧ ☽
Главный страх Сано - Кушель #Блейз
custom 52695934553355819056custom 53304909032723874723custom 52088076593686324451custom 53665484379175265341custom 53931464445321761491custom 54024200563133179081
Signed ⓘ• 𝗠𝗿. 𝗡𝗲𝘀𝗾𝘂𝗶𝗸
Вот они - слева на право. А вообще, такая активность не может не радовать. #БелыйКлык
custom 52695934553355819054custom 53304909032723874722custom 52088076593686324451custom 53189485050818810141custom 53665484379175265341custom 53665799801573501451custom 53931464445321761491custom 54024200563133179081
Signed ☾ ⛧ 𓃦 𝑩𝒆л𝒃ıй 𝑲л𝒃ıк 𓄈 ⛧ ☽
Кризис настиг Работка, август, все вахуи, все умрут #Аято
custom 53304909032723874726custom 54024200563133179083custom 52088076593686324452custom 52695934553355819051custom 53189485050818810141custom 53665799801573501451custom 53931464445321761491
Signed ༻🪭° 𝘀𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗵𝗼𝗼𝘂𝘀 ˆ𐃷ˆ
⭐️⭐️🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 ⭐️⭐️🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤 29.07.2026-Оленья луна🌕 Шош, чувачки, всем привет. Сегодня мы отмечали полнолуние, вновь в чате, но это не помешало играм пройти просто замечательно !! Сегодня мы очень много смеялись, очень много прикольных моментов было (те, кто вне контекста могут конечно не понять, но я выше прикрепил пару скринов, что влезли) Мы играли в мафию 4 раунда, в бункер 1, и в крокодила 29. И …
custom 52695934553355819055custom 53304909032723874722❤1custom 52088076593686324451custom 53189485050818810141custom 53665799801573501451custom 53931464445321761491custom 54024200563133179081
Signed ༻🪭° 𝘀𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗵𝗼𝗼𝘂𝘀 ˆ𐃷ˆ
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @WolfPackWild. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 374,850 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Nᴏʙlᴇ Wᴏlvᴇs: Chᴀnnᴇl☕” (@WolfPackWild), 83 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WolfPackWild.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.