Wolf of Pumps Insider channel pinned «Valueless is roughly sitting at 2x since call, and was at some point up 12-13x since call, floor is strong and community made a website, remade banner, and more people are tunning in. This really seems like the token that sends to millions out of nowhere,…»

Channel
Wolf of Pumps Insider channel
@WolfOfWallPumpStreetInsider
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
802subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002224143182 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @WolfOfWallPumpStreetInsider |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/WolfOfWallPumpStreetInsider |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 21:01 | 802 | -9 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 15:36 | 811 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 812 | +5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:44 | 807 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 808 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 808 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 29 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
107 reactions across 13 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 29 | 27.1% | |
| 🔥 | 27 | 25.2% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 13.1% | |
| 👏 | 14 | 13.1% | |
| 😁 | 11 | 10.3% | |
| 🫡 | 7 | 6.54% | |
| 🤗 | 2 | 1.87% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.935% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.935% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 0.935% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 107 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2025 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Valueless is roughly sitting at 2x since call, and was at some point up 12-13x since call, floor is strong and community made a website, remade banner, and more people are tunning in. This really seems like the token that sends to millions out of nowhere, when right people find it 😉🔥 Ca: 5x89k1jty8zDZ9mVQc93UNof64tbYNqakb9VZFVMpump Dex: https://dexscreener.com/solana/6zs5bbwgtjvnejjm7uk6qezuamx5bar16xquwpwgaeaw Twit…
❤3🔥1🫡1
Wolf of Pumps Insider channel pinned «Maybe not so valueless? Ca: 5x89k1jty8zDZ9mVQc93UNof64tbYNqakb9VZFVMpump Dex: https://dexscreener.com/solana/6zs5bbwgtjvnejjm7uk6qezuamx5bar16xquwpwgaeaw»
Maybe not so valueless? Ca: 5x89k1jty8zDZ9mVQc93UNof64tbYNqakb9VZFVMpump Dex: https://dexscreener.com/solana/6zs5bbwgtjvnejjm7uk6qezuamx5bar16xquwpwgaeaw
❤5😁3👏1🫡1
currently at 150K, has already 6x'ed since call 🔥💪 ca: 93fqqoxdr5h9pLchBuLn6JohUBt71W98vU4kHrykpump Dex: https://dexscreener.com/solana/9max9jpgxnkhbbmmvyg9aa9wqz2d8ijubqehvkg2wx8t
🔥5❤1👏1
Wolf of Pumps Insider channel pinned «Damn Diana held up strong since yesterday tbh (from 25k to 36K), I think it will send once it brakes the ATH + It's going viral on Tiktok 🔥 CA: 93fqqoxdr5h9pLchBuLn6JohUBt71W98vU4kHrykpump Dex: https://dexscreener.com/solana/9max9jpgxnkhbbmmvyg9aa9wqz2d…»
Damn Diana held up strong since yesterday tbh (from 25k to 36K), I think it will send once it brakes the ATH + It's going viral on Tiktok 🔥 CA: 93fqqoxdr5h9pLchBuLn6JohUBt71W98vU4kHrykpump Dex: https://dexscreener.com/solana/9max9jpgxnkhbbmmvyg9aa9wqz2d8ijubqehvkg2wx8t
❤2🔥2👏1🫡1
Wolf of Pumps Insider channel pinned «Just joined the trenches again, now that I see it's more stabilized. Trying to find a runner by looking what is trending on tiktok. Saw that this is trending hard, but it's only at 25k MC, hopefully a good runner for people that are still active 😁 https:…»
Just joined the trenches again, now that I see it's more stabilized. Trying to find a runner by looking what is trending on tiktok. Saw that this is trending hard, but it's only at 25k MC, hopefully a good runner for people that are still active 😁 https://dexscreener.com/solana/9max9jpgxnkhbbmmvyg9aa9wqz2d8ijubqehvkg2wx8t
❤3🔥3👍1💋1😁1
Wolf of Pumps Insider channel pinned Deleted message
Today bonk.fun has become the biggest launchpad for memetokens in volume, it's still lacking behind in the amount of traders and liquidity, but surely we are witnessing the downfall of pump.fun/rug 🤯 (trends are showing that it will just barely get above the 50% market Share mark with in the next 18 hours)
👍4😁2🫡1
Have some platform updates soon! 🔥💪
❤4👏1🫡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @WolfOfWallPumpStreetInsider. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Wolf of Pumps Insider channel” (@WolfOfWallPumpStreetInsider), 802 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WolfOfWallPumpStreetInsider.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.