У меня к слову есть ТГК канал @Paranoid_Young Лучше туда подпишитесь, там хоть это контент есть, я стикеры делать начал запросы на них принимаю, а так же я неплохо дизайнер с хорошими отзывами. Может кому интересно будет, нежеле сидеть в закрытом канале
Channel
[Closed]
@WoEmptLIFE
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
35subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002465547883 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @WoEmptLIFE |
| Created | 9 November 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/WoEmptLIFE |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 35 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:31 | 35 | first reading |
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 9 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
13 reactions across 2 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5454193022323419539 | 6 | 46.2% | |
| custom 5350503436532073409 | 2 | 15.4% | |
| custom 5451957637874743660 | 2 | 15.4% | |
| custom 5888515392493590220 | 2 | 15.4% | |
| custom 5888701476246657603 | 1 | 7.69% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 9 November 2024 to 18 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
— Мне уже начинается казаться что тут сижу я и моя шиза на 49 аккаунтов
— Тут явно сидят люди но я не понимаю зачем, люди вам норм? Может мне вам анекдот рассказать
Кто эти 55 человек которые тут до сих сидят Вроде даже аккаунты все нормальные. Почти пол года прошло с момента закрытия
custom 54541930223234195393custom 54519576378747436602custom 58885153924935902202
[Closed] pinned Deleted message
#Boothill - это было ожидаемо. шёпота больше не слышно, проект прекращает свою работу. со своими же союзами я не расстаюсь, но пойму, если кто-то сделает разрыв, в связи с такой новостью. оставшихся же заберу в новый проект. #Important𝚆𝚘𝙴 #Repost𝚆𝚘𝙴
Signed 𝐌𝐞𝐫𝐥𝐨𝐭.
[Closed] pinned «#MoonEaterDanHan — Чтож вот и завершения коллаба близко мы узнали кто предатель. Это было довольно увлекательное время и думаю пора вам кое что сообщить. Я потерял аккаунт и мне до сих не отвечает тех поддержка, я не имею доступа или прав в проекте что удручает…»
#MoonEaterDanHan — Чтож вот и завершения коллаба близко мы узнали кто предатель. Это было довольно увлекательное время и думаю пора вам кое что сообщить. Я потерял аккаунт и мне до сих не отвечает тех поддержка, я не имею доступа или прав в проекте что удручает меня и поэтому я принял решение закрыть этот проект, история этого проекта насчитывает 10 месяцев, и она так глупо завершилась. Никогда бы не подумал что т…
custom 54541930223234195393custom 53505034365320734092custom 58887014762466576031
Signed 𝐌𝐞𝐫𝐥𝐨𝐭.
Channel created
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @WoEmptLIFE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 199,200 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@verm0x_home · 128 posts[ заморозка ] 🥂 𝘼𝙨𝙥𝙚𝙣 𝙇𝙚𝙖𝙛 [ 𝙡𝙞𝙛𝙚-𝙘𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙣𝙚𝙡 ]
@aspnlife · 105 postsзакрыто..𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐞 • 𝐌𝐎𝐎𝐍 ᯓ 𝐃𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐌𝐒 🐙
@moonidreamslife · 462 posts𝓘𝙨 𝓣𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝓣𝙝𝙚 𝓛𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩?̾ ; 𝐋𝐢𝐟𝐞
@this_islight_Lf · 252 posts[ЗАКРЫТО」ᯓ𝘎𖦹𝘢𝘵 𝘩𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴‹⟨ᡣ𐭩⟩›「𝘭𝘪𝘧𝘦」
@goathappylife · 191 postзакрыты.
@Iife_memories · 661 post|🧊| ˒˓ 𝖫𝖺 𝖿𝗋𖹭𝗇𝖼𝗁𝗂𝗌𝖾. . . | 𝖫𝗂𝖿𝖾.
@LaFranchiseLI · 331 post[закрыт] |𝐋𝐈𝐅𝐄| 𝐋𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐈𝐧 𝐓𝐢𝐦𝐞 #LiT
@life_losttime · 221 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“[Closed]” (@WoEmptLIFE), 35 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WoEmptLIFE.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.