Voice message, posted without a caption
π₯76π70π57β€54

Channel
@WladOfBuild1
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Domains linked from posts Β· Cite this entry
660,610subscribers
-4,102 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 316,228β1,000,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002043963637 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @WladOfBuild1 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/WladOfBuild1 |
Other / unclassifiable β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 660,610 | -772 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 661,382 | -828 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 662,210 | -654 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:21 | 662,864 | -817 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:36 | 663,681 | -712 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 664,393 | -319 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:45 | 664,712 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 11 June 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 13 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
6,716 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π₯ | 1,749 | 26.0% | |
| β€ | 1,704 | 25.4% | |
| π | 1,650 | 24.6% | |
| π | 1,611 | 24.0% | |
| π€© | 2 | 0.03% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 6,716reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 13 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Voice message, posted without a caption
π₯76π70π57β€54
https://t.me/WDMMarketAnalytics
π₯98π97π96β€95
Voice message, posted without a caption
π130β€125π₯122π115
Easy Game with the indicator
β€85π₯69π68π59
Www.wdmtrading.com
β€147π116π₯111π102
Easy Money with the WDM strategy π°
β€108π₯89π84π81π€©1
Soon available πΆπ¨βπ³
π118β€101π101π₯98π€©1
Photo, posted without a caption
π₯119β€109π106π88
Voice message, posted without a caption
π110π98β€95π₯85
Video, posted without a caption
β€157π156π₯136π130
Voice message, posted without a caption
π₯102β€85π82π74
πΊπΈ Trump cancels strikes on Iran
π₯98π90π81β€72
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @WladOfBuild1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank β 1,004,833 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
One domainthis channelβs own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves β not the channelβs description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βWladOfBuild-π¨π»βπ³β (@WladOfBuild1), 660,610 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WladOfBuild1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.