Channel
@Witaminch
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,063subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001887131977 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Witaminch |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Witaminch |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:04 | 2,063 | -7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:35 | 2,070 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:10 | 2,066 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 2,068 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:37 | 2,068 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (20 July 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 13,352 |
| Reactions total | 349 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
349 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 191 | 54.7% | |
| 👍 | 139 | 39.8% | |
| custom 5467658895847608185 | 13 | 3.72% | |
| 🐳 | 5 | 1.43% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.287% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 349reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Witaminch. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔽 کره داره میریزه، ژاپن دلار میفروشه؛ نوبت بازارهای جهانیه؟ 🚨 یه نمودار ترسناک این روزها دست به دست میشه که میگه تقریبا هر بحران بزرگ مالی اول از کره جنوبی شروع شده. جمله خیلی جذابیه، ولی کاملا دقیق نیست. بحران مالی آسیا سال ۱۹۹۷ از تایلند و سقوط بات شروع شد، نه کره. حباب دات کام و ورشکستگی لمن برادرز هم از سئول کلید نخوردن. اما یه بخش مهم حرف درسته؛ کره جنوبی خیلی وقت ها جرقه بحران نیست، ولی یکی از اولین جاهاییه که…
❤14
💵 وقتی ۵۸ میلیون دلار میدی، فقط خونه نمیخری 🏝 تصور کن صبح پرده رو کنار بزنی و به جای ساختمون بغلی، فقط دریای کارائیب رو ببینی. نه توریست اتفاقی، نه همسایه شلوغ، نه حتی جاده عمومی. این عمارت اسمش The Aerie و روی Moskito Island در جزایر ویرجین بریتانیا قرار گرفته؛ یه ملک خصوصی روی یه جزیره خصوصی. یعنی واقعا با یه جور جزیره داخل جزیره طرفیم. 💎 زمین این ملک نزدیک ۱۲ هزار متر مربع، اما خود عمارت حدود ۱۷۶۵ متر زیربنا و ۱…
❤18👍5custom 54676588958476081852🐳1
⏱ وقتی همه چیز رو داری، آخرین چیزی که میخوای بخری زمانه 🕖 آدم معمولی وقتی پولدار میشه دنبال خونه بهتر، ماشین گرون تر یا سفر بیشتر میره. اما وقتی قدرت و ثروتت تقریبا هیچ سقفی نداره، یه دشمن باقی میمونه که نه با پول میشه خریدش، نه با ارتش شکستش داد؛ پیر شدن. حالا روسیه ظاهرا ۲۶ میلیارد دلار گذاشته وسط تا با همین دشمن بجنگه و کسی که پشت این پروژه ایستاده، ولادیمیر پوتین ۷۳ ساله است. 🎙 شایعات از یه مکالمه عجیب شروع شد …
❤23👍3
😎 پیرمرد بازی رو بهتر بلد بود؟! 💰 قصه از سال ۱۹۹۱ شروع میشه. یه شب، جی هاوارد مارشال، میلیاردر ۸۶ ساله نفتی، وارد یه کلاب در هیوستون میشه و اونجا با دختری ۲۳ ساله به اسم ویکی لین هوگان آشنا میشه. دختری که بعدها همه دنیا اون رو با اسم آنا نیکول اسمیت شناختن. اختلاف سنی این دو نفر بیشتر از ۶۰ سال بود، ولی همین آشنایی کوتاه، شروع یکی از جنجالی ترین دعواهای ارث در تاریخ آمریکا شد. 😁 آنا یه دختر معمولی گمنام نموند. خیل…
👍16❤2
🐈⬛ گربه ها انگار با پینگ صفر به دنیا میان 🐈 تو ویدئو، موجودی رو میبینیم که سیستم عصبیش برای شکار، فرار و تصمیم گرفتن در چند صدم ثانیه ساخته شده. عددی که درباره سرعت واکنش گربه ها زیاد میچرخه بین ۲۰ تا ۷۰ میلی ثانیه است. البته ۲۰ میلی ثانیه بیشتر به شروع بعضی پاسخ های عصبی مربوطه، نه اینکه گربه تو ۲۰ میلی ثانیه یه حرکت کامل انجام بده. ولی تو آزمایش های حرکتی، واکنش های حدود ۶۰ تا ۷۰ میلی ثانیه هم ثبت شده. برای مقایس…
❤19👍5custom 54676588958476081854
💵 وقتی حرف رییس جمهور بازار رو تکون میده ولی قراره حرفاش رو بفروشه ⚡️ قصه اینه که ترامپ درباره تعرفه، جنگ، نفت، قراردادهای دولتی یا یه شرکت خاص پست میذاره، بازار در چند ثانیه بالا و پایین میشه، بعد شرکتی که خودش از سهامدارهای اصلیشه میاد دسترسی سریع تر به همین پست ها رو به وال استریت میفروشه. یعنی خبر برای مردم رایگانه، ولی چند میلی ثانیه زودتر فهمیدنش فقط برای پولدارهاست. 📈 اسم سرویس Truth API و مستقیم برای بانک …
❤20👍1
💵 اروپا داره پول نقد رو آروم آروم بازنشسته میکنه؟ 💶 تصور کن چند سال دیگه بخوای تو اروپا با پول خودت یه ماشین، ساعت یا وسیله گرون بخری، ولی فروشنده بگه بیشتر از ۱۰ هزار یورو نقد قبول نمیکنم، چون غیرقانونیه. حتی اگه مبلغ خریدت از ۳ هزار یورو بیشتر بشه، باید کارت شناسایی بدی تا معامله انجام بشه. یعنی پول توی جیب خودته، ولی برای خرج کردنش باید توضیح بدی کی هستی. 🚨 این قراره از ۱۰ جولای ۲۰۲۷ تو هر ۲۷ کشور اتحادیه اروپا …
❤15👍4
🤩 تلگرام، زیباترین زندان محتواست 📝 تلگرام هر چند مدت یه فابلیت جدید اضافه میکنه مثلا از همین چند وقت پیش کاربران پریمیوم میتونن بدون نیاز به بات، پیام هایی شبیه مقاله کامل بسازن. تیتر، جدول، لیست، عکس، ویدیو، موسیقی، Markdown و حتی فرمول های LaTeX. یعنی یه پست تلگرامی دیگه فقط چند خط متن ساده نیست و میتونه شبیه یه صفحه حرفه ای از سایت طراحی بشه. 🚀 انصافا تیم تلگرام همیشه از نظر محصول چند قدم جلوتر بوده. کانال، بات،…
👍39❤21👎1
🥇 طلای دنیا واقعا دست چه کسانیه؟ 🟡 وقتی اسم طلا میاد، بیشتر ما یاد انگشتر، گردنبند و ویترین طلافروشی میفتیم. ولی واقعیت اینه که طلای دنیا فقط برای خوشگلی ساخته نشده. بخش بزرگی از اون توی گاوصندوق بانک های مرکزی، صندوق های سرمایه گذاری و دست آدم هاییه که طلا رو نه برای پوشیدن، بلکه برای روزهای سخت نگه میدارن. 💍 طبق آمار شورای جهانی طلا، حدود ۴۴ درصد مصرف طلا مربوط به جواهرات و مصنوعات زینتیه. یعنی هنوز بزرگ ترین مشت…
❤18👍4🐳1custom 54676588958476081851
❌ وقتی اسم برند، مزه آب شلنگ رو هم عوض میکنه 🚰تو یکی از برنامه های امریکا یه ازمایش جالب میکنند، از شلنگ کنار خیابون یه لیوان آب پر میکنه، بعد همون آب رو به اسم یه برند لاکچری تو یه لیوان خیلی شیک میده دست مردم. واکنش ها واقعا دیدنیه؛ یکی میگه طعمش خاصه، یکی حس میکنه کیفیت بالایی داره، یکی حتی براش ویژگی هایی پیدا میکنه که احتمالا چند دقیقه قبل توی آب شلنگ وجود نداشت. فقط یه اسم و یه لیوان شیک کافی بود تا مغز، مزه آ…
👍14❤10custom 54676588958476081856
Posted without readable text
❤8👍2🐳1
💵 قیمت بازار فقط نظر آخرین فروشنده است 🛒 فرض کن توی یه محله همه خونه هاشون رو دوست دارن و حاضر نیستن بفروشن، اما یه نفر به خاطر نیاز فوری، خونه اش رو ارزون تر معامله میکنه. از فردا همه میگن قیمت خونه تو این محله اینقدره؛ در حالی که فقط یک نفر فروخته و بقیه اصلا حاضر نبودن با اون قیمت معامله کنن. بازارهای مالی هم خیلی وقت ها دقیقا همین شکلی کار میکنن. 📉 چیزی که روی نمودار به عنوان قیمت بیت کوین، طلا، سهم یا یه توکن …
❤14👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @Witaminch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 360,318 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ویتامین - Witamin” (@Witaminch), 2,063 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Witaminch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.