Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
WishRealm.
@WishRealm
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
6subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002859099091 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @WishRealm |
| Description | @WishrealmBot &. @WishRealms |
| Created | 3 August 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/WishRealm |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 6 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:36 | 6 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 3 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 4
- Videos
- 3
- Links
- 3
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 46s
- Average length
- 15s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
100 reactions across 6 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 | 13 | 13.0% | |
| 🍾 | 11 | 11.0% | |
| 💘 | 9 | 9.00% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 9.00% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 8.00% | |
| ☃ | 7 | 7.00% | |
| 🍓 | 6 | 6.00% | |
| 🐳 | 6 | 6.00% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 5.00% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 4.00% | |
| 🆒 | 4 | 4.00% | |
| 👾 | 4 | 4.00% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 3.00% | |
| 🦄 | 3 | 3.00% | |
| 💊 | 2 | 2.00% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 2.00% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 2.00% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 1.00% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 100reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2025 to 11 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 8
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 3
- of 14 we hold a reading for · 21%
- Most on one post
- 5
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @WishRealm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2025 to 11 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Happy Birthday, Sion! Birthdays are the universe's way of telling us to pause and acknowledge the impact we’ve made. When I think of you, I think of resilience, kindness, and a one of kind spirit that can’t be replicated. This year, I don’t just wish you success but I wish you fulfillment. I wish you the courage to say 'yes' to new adventures and the strength to stay true to your path. May your days be scripted with …
❤🔥5❤2
ㅤ #HOMEY ft @TWIBFESS. Home was the first poem that bore-in-mind, chiseled within the most serene yet heartwarming cavities of our memory. Allegorized to a ship that wabbled and finally found a harbor to stop, we finally meet you, @Wishrealm. None amount of storms can shatter our wholehearted desire for staying. Thence, we intend to stay whilst carving tales as part of each breath we will breathe hereafter and beyon…
❤2💘2👏1
HAPPY MENSIVE 😭🥰❤️🫰🏻
❤1
Happy mensive my home.
❤1🔥1
📝 Petalsipped echoes of love drizzle like fleeting candor, haunting mellow chords inside. Since boredom’s claw grips tight, may you slip us @wishrealm into Who The Most (WTM)? Endlessly obliged. @wtmlist for reference. 👤 Wtm dewasa 👤 Wtm posesif 👤 Wtm crybaby 👤 Wtm flirty 👤 WTM sibuk 👤 Wtm cerewet 👤 Wtm tengil 👤 wtm hts 👤 Wtm imup 👤 Wtm tukang galau 👤 wtm penyayang 👤 Wtm loyo 👤 Wtm cengeng. 👤 wtm imut …
THE DAY HAS FINALLY ARRIVED! NCT WISH IS OFFICIALLY BACK WITH "COLOR" <🍀🤍> This comeback is not merely a song. It is a story of joy woven into melody, a gentle reminder that even the simplest notes can carry the warmth of the sun. Congratulations to the boys for creating a piece that feels like hope unfolding in sound. And to everyone who carries them close in their heart, especially: @WISHCHU @WISHREALM @LUNEVEIL @…
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ㅤㅤㅤTONE OF YOUTHFUL VIBRATION! ㅤㅤㅤWHAT’S POPPIN’ HERE? ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ▸ 🧩🖍 ✶ ㅤㅤㅤ(엔시티 위시) - @WishRealm Springing from darkness, stepping back into lightness amongst bright-coloured arrangement to soothe the souls. Where the symphony meets mellifluous song, its verse are intertwined with youthful vibrations. Bright-and-breezy lines whose awaken the entire persona. Each well-arranged accompaniments in such perf…
🏆7💘7🐳6☃4🍓4🍾4🦄3❤2
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤㅤ 🌊 CATCH THE ENDLESS WAVE It’s bumping hips on the pier while sunset setting the world aglow, waves crestling softly down the feet. / “Something about the smell just bring us back to the blue water.” #SummerColorWithWISH. ㅤㅤ ㅤㅤ
Thick air hangs over, humid blanket that settled deep into the bones, pressing against the skin like a secret too close to bear. Sun bleeds stretched the sky in violent wash of tangerine speck in orange yonder, bruised plum, heat and slow-burning fever. Moon roses, bone-white silver in the middle of vast black night, casted a lunelight that made flesh; something so tender that made our worn-out skins begin to be born…
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @WishRealm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 202,231 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@WISHCHU · 1785 postsASTROCAT.
@AastroCat · 3094 postsBE WISH: #19GameOnRyo
@BeWiish · 803 postsMINDWAVE.
@MlNDWAVE · 6,4392 postsRiku Ensemble.
@riible · 511 postRYOTROUBLE.
@RyoTrouble · 71 postThe Tsesarevich, Nikolovich Brotherhood.
@TheeNikolovich · 2,9421 postWishcrest. #SummerColorWithWISH
@Wishcrest · 171 postW!SH.EXE
@WishExe · 1,5661 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@AastroCat · 3092 postsRiku Ensemble.
@riible · 512 postsSAKUVALE.
@SAKUVALE · 742 postsSION STAR.
@Siontar · 182 postsWISHCHU.
@WISHCHU · 1782 postsYUSHIFY.
@Yushify · 3372 posts13 대용 • 영원히 대구 삼라이온즈만 바라봄 【ㅈㅎ】 🦁💙
@daeayoung · 381 post𝐋𝐔𝐍𝐄𝐕𝐄𝐈𝐋
@LUNEVEIL · 211 postSaint Of Wish.
@SaintOfWish · 81 postNANO STYLE
@style_nano · 7371 postwho the most
@wtmlist · 8981 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 8
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 8
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@WishRealm named 8 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WishRealm.” (@WishRealm), 6 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WishRealm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.