https://t.me/Whibbon/5

Channel
MINDWAVE.
@MlNDWAVE
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,439subscribers
-50 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002582240213 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MlNDWAVE |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MlNDWAVE |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:24 | 6,439 | -12 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:51 | 6,451 | -38 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:26 | 6,489 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 6,489 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.03%
- avg views ÷ 6,439 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 66.0
- 16 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 9.02%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 16
- of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (28 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,056 |
| Reactions total | 22 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 24s
- Average length
- 8s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
22 reactions across 3 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 5 | 22.7% | |
| ☃ | 3 | 13.6% | |
| 🆒 | 3 | 13.6% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 13.6% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 13.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 4.55% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 4.55% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 4.55% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 4.55% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 4.55% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MlNDWAVE. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ˖ ۫ PASTORAL SESTINA FOR A PIE PETALS PASTRY, AND SHY ÉCLAT. . ࣪ ˖ (Tartelette of Cherry Flesh.) The gingham lies folded liturgical ministry, its corners tucked like a small autel between foxgloves and low boughs that perfume the air, sunlight pours miel through the leaves, pooling warm on a crust that exhales pl…
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤㅤ ㅤ│ Quiet As A Wet River Stone ㅤ│ Wedged Between The Floor, Throb ㅤ│ Of An Amber Pulse Like A Heart ㅤ│ Buried Deep In The Garden Dirt. ㅤ ──────── ••• ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ㅤ( #19GameOnRyo ) ㅤㅤㅤTime Doesn’t Measure Itself In ㅤㅤㅤGold, It Gathers In The Calloused ㅤㅤㅤPress Of Thumbs. 🎮`! ㅤㅤ
ㅤㅤ One more trip around the sun gets notched into the grain of the wood. Another year earned, not given, like surviving a long dry spell while the heat hums low through the window screens and the weeds push their way up through the cracks in the back porch. This is the parable of turning one year older: press the button down, box warms up under palms like an old brick left out in the noon sun, and suddenly, the whole…
Mindwave's Bonnie update for the 1st time lhoya 👆🏻😆
Posted without readable text
☃3🎉3💘3🔥3🆒3❤🔥1🍓1🍾1
Sticker, posted without a caption
kitaaa main
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤㅤ ⌜ㅤㅤㅤㅤ ㅤ 𝙀𝙉𝙏𝙍𝙀𝘼𝙏𝙀 𝙏𝙊 𝙅𝙊𝙔𝙊𝙐𝙎 𝘾𝙀𝙇𝙀𝘽𝙍𝘼𝙏𝙄𝙊𝙉 ㅤㅤ𝘊𝘩𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘪𝘤𝘭𝘦𝘥 𝘢𝘤𝘳𝘰𝘴𝘴 𝘦𝘹𝘶𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘯𝘦 ㅤㅤ 𝘰𝘧 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘦𝘦 𝘩𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘶𝘯𝘧𝘰𝘭𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘢𝘴𝘴𝘢𝘨𝘦𝘴 ㅤㅤㅤ #XngHanXoul1stMemoire ִ ࣪𖤐 ㅤㅤㅤㅤ ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ㅤㅤ⌟ ㅤㅤ ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ㅤ ⋆ ⋆ ⋆ The quiet echoes of a year refuses to fade as they lies within this tapestry of journees wishing time never diminish. Each taken photographs and written voyages are the fragment of a soul whom once wandered upon…
💘1
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ .𖥔 ݁ ˖ Countless letters found their place to rest upon these pages since the last July 31st as the odyssey start inscribed. Thousand pages have borne witness to an incredible wayfaring and each of its precious moments alongside the panoramas it holds captured in polaroids. Time may weather the bind and yellow the paper, yet what is cherished lives on within the memories of those who holds it dearly. Every …
💘1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @MlNDWAVE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 122,214 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@callogys · 61 postDANGDUTERS.
@dasdangduters · 211 postHARTWELL FILES.
@DeHartwell · 171 postконверт дворникова
@DvornikovTerritory · 81 postLastborn Legends. 🚸
@ForManop · 111 postGowan Suite: The Pilgrim's Coziest Hideaway.
@GowanSuite · 1,4021 postThe Hikkimori Club!
@HikkimoriClub · 1691 postkiiivory's!
@kiiivorys · 121 postKwangerine's Notepad
@Kwangerinotes · 11 postCEYAPIM: The Unyielding Flame of Fearless Beauty.
@lesserafimm · 101 postSilvyrnee's Archive.
@Silvyrnee · 41 postTGO: The Documents.
@TGOdocs · 111 postblissette’s pinkprint. 💗
@TheBlissette · 391 postVilens' Keepsakes.
@Vilensians · 171 postSURE(V)iVE
@WeSUREVIVE · 2971 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 45 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@NEEWMIND · 2918 postsTGO: The Documents.
@TGOdocs · 1118 postsNorvein's.
@Norveins · 2112 postsThe Labrysse
@TheLabrysse · 912 postsOlden Veil Hidden Chord.
@OldenVeils · 208 posts[ DISBAND ] NOIRTHED
@Noirthed · 3714 postsFamily of Velthrone: The Conjurer's Ancestry
@TheVelthrone · 8,6034 postsWAVESPROJECTS #NUNEWLUSTROUS25.
@mindwaveprojects · 963 postsARSIP PONDVILL
@archivepondvill · 52 postsThe Hikkimori Club!
@HikkimoriClub · 1692 postsJASP.ER PROJECT #JASPERLoveScene
@JASPPROJECT · 392 postsLouis Society's archive.
@LouistyChive · 132 postsMistlesoir Household: Return Of The Ice Heirs..
@Mistlesoir · 7,6242 postsNuNew's 7th Single Project. #NuNewKATA
@NuNewProjects · 32 postsDOMUNDI FAMS.
@DMDFAMS · 711 postHarmony In The Forest, Ellvius.
@Ellvius · 4,4641 postEverbloom's.
@EverTaIes · 101 postChamber Of Feathers.
@fimesses · 221 postkiiivory's!
@kiiivorys · 121 postLuevine’s Adventure Book.
@LuevineRepository · 301 postSancthoed
@SancthoedHalls · 151 postSilvyrnee's Archive.
@Silvyrnee · 41 postblissette’s pinkprint. 💗
@TheBlissette · 391 postsomber fabric of lunelia. (..✱)
@tikelunelia · 111 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@BZIIERs · 1411 postEverydae with EVERYDÆNG
@everyDAENG · 401 postGeldart's Archive
@geldartarchive · 471 postHAOVISION: The Sanctuary For The Ruined
@HAOVISION · 1,2171 postMeowchine is OPEN!
@meowchine · 2491 postRiku Ensemble.
@riible · 511 postRYOTROUBLE.
@RyoTrouble · 81 postSAKUVALE.
@SAKUVALE · 731 postSCENEOTRE.
@Sceneotre · 421 postHaushalt: Schäfer Familie
@SchaferHaus · 11,9761 postSION STAR.
@Siontar · 181 post"Eternal Kin : The Geldart of the Family"
@TheGeldart · 7,2281 postTRNDSETTE : CLOSE.
@TRNDSETTEE · 1,9691 postWHIB, ON! #WHIBCherryPie.
@Whibbon · 21 postSpan of Ledger: Wishaze.
@WISHAZEE · 2,6051 postWISHCHU.
@WISHCHU · 1771 postW!SH.EXE
@WishExe · 1,5471 postWISHNITY.
@Wishnity · 1,2281 postWishRealm.
@WishRealm · 61 postWISHIE
@WlSHIE · 81 postXNGHANS.
@xnghalilintar · 91 postXNGHAN-N-XOUL. #XngHanXoul1stMemoire
@xnghanNxoul · 151 postYUSHOWL: ( HOLD-SFS.)
@YUSHOWL · 1,4051 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MINDWAVE.” (@MlNDWAVE), 6,439 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MlNDWAVE.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.