Stay up to date with the exciting development from the Winstant Group. Winstant stands for the world in an Instant. affiliated entities include WinstantPay, World KYC and other founds at www.winstant.tech
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 31 May 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 157–159 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 18:01
158
no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:46
158
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 20 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
42.1%
avg views ÷ 158 subscribers
Avg views / post
66.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held
20 (20 January 2026 – 27 July 2026)
Views total
133
Reactions total
9
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
51
Videos
1
Links
154
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
88 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
40
45.5%
❤
28
31.8%
❤🔥
6
6.82%
🔥
6
6.82%
🏆
3
3.41%
🙏
3
3.41%
⚡
1
1.14%
🍾
1
1.14%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 88reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 January 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Apple Wallet & Google Wallet Meet Sovereign Digital Identity - Introducing TrustPass™ by TON Stealth ID
Apple Wallet and Google Wallet have made digital credential presentation familiar to billions of users.
Today, TON Stealth ID introduces TrustPass™—a new way for individuals, businesses, and products to present verifiable credentials through the wallets they already use, while keeping identity under sovereign con…
AUSTRALIA’S DIGITAL ECONOMY: CONNECTING BANKS AND WEB3
TradeEnabler is pleased to announce that our Co-Founder, Hervé Lacorne, will join the Digital Trade Forum panel hosted by the Digital Economy Council of Australia (DECA) in Brisbane on 3 September.
The digital economy cannot develop separately from the institutions that underpin the wider economy—particularly banks.
“Laws should serve business, not a particula…
𝐈𝐧𝐧𝐨𝐯𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐃𝐢𝐠𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐅𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞: 𝐓𝐫𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐄𝐧𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞𝐫 𝐉𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐒𝐖𝐈𝐅𝐓 𝐇𝐚𝐜𝐤𝐚𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐧
We are excited to announce that TradeEnabler has officially submitted its application to the 𝐒𝐖𝐈𝐅𝐓 𝐇𝐚𝐜𝐤𝐚𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐧 2026.
The SWIFT Hackathon brings together financial institutions, infrastructure providers, fintech innovators, and technology leaders to explore how emerging technologies can strengthen the future of global financial services.
At TradeEnable…
𝐇𝐞𝐫𝐯é 𝐋𝐚𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐧𝐞 𝐰𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐛𝐞 𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐩𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐮𝐩𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐠 "𝐒𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐁𝐥𝐨𝐜𝐤𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐏𝐮𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐜 𝐆𝐨𝐨𝐝" 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐭, 𝐡𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐛𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐔𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐃𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐥𝐨𝐩𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐦𝐦𝐞 (𝐔𝐍𝐃𝐏) 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐜𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐬𝐏𝐨 𝐚𝐬 𝐚 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐨𝐟 𝐎𝐟 𝐓𝐚𝐥𝐤 𝐒𝐢𝐝𝐞 𝐄𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐭!
This conversation perfectly aligns with the journey detailed in "Blockchain for Good: The Untold Story". For over 20 years, the focus has been on transforming resources into levers for local development and economic sov…
Excited to announce that Hervé Lacorne, CEO of Winstant lLtd, will be attending the prestigious Proof of Talk event in Paris! 🇫🇷
At Winstant, 2026 is all about delivering "The Real Game Changer" in the Fintech and Web3 space. We are bridging the gap between traditional finance and decentralized technology to revolutionize global trade, compliance, and financial inclusion.
Through our comprehensive ecosystem—featuri…
One of my key takeaways from Southeast Asia Blockchain Week Bangkok:
The future of Real World Assets is not just tokenization… it is productive yield tied to real economic activity.
Very interesting presentation by Aaron Gwak from Libeara on how tokenized gold can generate conservative yield through real-world manufacturing ecosystems.
This aligns strongly with where I believe sovereign gold-backed digital infrastruc…
WinstantGold / 𝐁𝐥𝐨𝐠 21
𝐀𝐗𝐈𝐒: 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐃𝐢𝐠𝐢𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐁𝐚𝐧𝐤𝐞𝐫'𝐬 𝐏𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞 (2)
AXIS is entering an operational phase: convincing banks and regulators of its true integration. By leveraging SWIFT, the system prioritizes compatibility and institutional credibility. With the 𝐓𝐫𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐒𝐢𝐠𝐧𝐚𝐥, trust becomes programmable before transactions. Its success will depend primarily on widespread adoption by global financial and institutional pl…
Bangkok TON Builders: Privacy & Infrastructure Meetup during SEA Blockchain Week! 🥐🇹🇭
Calling all developers, founders, and community leaders in the TON ecosystem! We are hosting a specialized TON Breakfast Bangkok during Southeast Asia Blockchain Week.
This is an intimate gathering focused on the core infrastructure that will scale the TON network and protect its users.
Join us for deep dives into:
✅ Programmable…
Why is Identity-Linked Finance a game-changer? 🚀
By integrating WorldKYC’s authentication with the XDCNetwork, TradeEnabler is making trade finance more inclusive and fraud-resistant than ever.
Identity + Finance = The Economy of Trust. 🛡️
Full story on Linkedin:
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7458093113169997824
#Blockchain #DeFi #Identity #TradeEnabler #DigitalAssets
SWIFT isn’t slow. That’s not the problem.
Just shared a post coming out of Money20/20 on why cross-border payments still take days—and how we can bring that down to minutes.
👉 It’s not about replacing SWIFT
👉 It’s about extending it with trust, validation, and settlement
Take a look:
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/lacorne88_swift-trustsignal-xdc-share-7454445525644296192-FaBx
Curious to get your thoughts.
Just shared this ahead of TON Breakfast Bangkok 👇
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/lacorne88_tradfi-ton-blockchain-share-7450846025637863424-itw8?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAAAcr20BSsvQ2H_TuaUMXtbzOU3gl1ZE4FQ
We’re kicking things off before Money20/20 — bringing TON, TradFi and Web3 together.
Excited to be working with Ruben and the RubeTON team on this.
If you’re in Bangkok this weekend, com…
👍4
Signed Herve
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Winstant. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 294,351 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Winstant named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@startupgrind named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Winstant Ltd.” (@Winstant), 158 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Winstant.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.