https://medium.com/@wingriderscom/catalyst-fund-12-vote-for-wingriders-innovative-projects-d13dac53f857
❤2👍1🔥1

Channel
@WingRidersOfficial
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
889subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001752254537 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @WingRidersOfficial |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/WingRidersOfficial |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:54 | 889 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:48 | 893 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 893 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
34 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 19 | 55.9% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 20.6% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 20.6% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 2.94% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 May 2024 to 3 July 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://medium.com/@wingriderscom/catalyst-fund-12-vote-for-wingriders-innovative-projects-d13dac53f857
❤2👍1🔥1
Video, posted without a caption
You can cast your votes for the proposals using the Catalyst Voting App. You can now vote on WingRiders catalyst proposals 4 out of 5 proposals are in the top 100 most impactful so thank you to all those who have reviewed us Voting is now open and you can view our propsoals below MVP: Plutarch DEX DeFi MVP smart-contract functions Audit & Bug Bounty https://cardano.ideascale.com/c/idea/123420 Developers: Open-Sou…
❤1
Here's our monthly overview for June $6.6M+ in TVL 5 tech updates 1 new partnership + Much more The wingriders continue to rise
❤2
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GRaRbGJWQAAZt8G?format=jpg&name=medium
Catalyst voting is live It’s time for an update, so we aim to launch V2 which will: - Enhance performance - Reduce fees - Introduce/Add new DeFi features - Increase security This will be done with an external audit and bug bounties available You can vote for our Audit here: https://cardano.ideascale.com/c/idea/123420
Catalyst Proposal voting begins in 2 days @Catalyst_onX propels collaborative innovation to new heights and fuels Cardano ecosystem expansion by connecting people with groundbreaking ideas to a funding source. This is important to further develop #Cardano and onboard more people. For this round, we have 5 proposals, ranging from a Hydra Head L2 explorer to our DEX Audit & Bug bounty! You can check all the propos…
https://x.com/wingriderscom/status/1803807998487212423
We commend Minswap for their visionary initiative to elevate the Cardano ecosystem by leveraging $ADA in their pools for Catalyst voting. Together, let’s propel Cardano to new heights! Let's break down our 'Open-source Hydra Head L2 Web based Explorer and API' https://x.com/MinswapDEX/status/1801636171379888171
WingRiders Weekly Tech Update 🛠 First V2 routed swap executed with both batch transactions chained in the same block ⛓ Request: https://preprod.cardanoscan.io/transaction/e14355dc8d9587f6ae120f6ffd8d62fc0c24c2fce8b136c0b05c784f6a39ec3c Batch transactions: 1) https://preprod.cardanoscan.io/transaction/722c1dca6d50b911d05c84b89501eb3f178e1d3de110778a066aedff388b4c63 2) https://preprod.cardanoscan.io/transaction/5af…
🔥3
A guide to Open-Source WingRiders Onchain DAO Governance 👇 Here's everything you need to know about how onchain governance works within WingRiders on #Cardano 1/ Context: We have built our open-source, on-chain, decentralized, and auditable DAO governance solution for Cardano. Our framework empowers projects with seamless community governance, enhancing transparency and trust for any project 🤝 2/ Key Features: …
❤2
All $WRT rewards for the content program have now been distributed ⚡️
❤1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @WingRidersOfficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,170,624 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@WingRidersOfficial named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WingRiders Announcements” (@WingRidersOfficial), 889 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WingRidersOfficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.