https://www.tradingview.com/symbols/GBPUSD/minds/?mind=wBmAASweRYqpxk5bZxCS_A&exchange=OANDA
Channel
WildStocks (Stonks)
@WildStonks
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
256subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001825111575 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @WildStonks |
| Description | stock channel offers expert tips and analysis for stocks and futures ( free channel) Do your own research always. we ask Allah reconcile and repay. |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/WildStonks |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 256 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 256 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 7 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 18
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 538
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
#TEAM Hit SL -19% and went to deep after that by -55% more! https://www.tradingview.com/x/Md45t4Ip/
$HUT Hit $140 from $30-34 zone +300% after 190 days! https://www.tradingview.com/x/EHWMeljq/ We ask Allah reconcile and repay
#SPX Is now the right time to sell? for TVC:SPX by HamadaMark — TradingView
Here is Update with chart explain comment above! #COPPER Cross Road! for OANDA:XCUUSD by HamadaMark — TradingView
..
#SPX Bearish Setup! https://www.tradingview.com/x/H35wPODB/
Copper saw a classic breakout from the Head and Shoulders pattern, gaining +7.5%, a 3:1 return on the trade setup I shared, before stalling around $6.6X and facing rejection as shown clearly on the chart. At this point, Copper has two options: hold the $6–$5.9 range for a while to give bulls a chance to gather strength and rebound toward $6.6–$7.2, or fail again and break down the key support zone with a direct sell…
TP1 was booked at $85, with NFLX dropping 13% since sharing this bearish analysis. 🤲 May Allah guide us to clarity and discipline.
S&P at $7500, keeping an eye on weekly performance. I’ve marked $7450–$7750 as the final bull target, so stay alert. Is SPX About to Repeat History? for TVC:SPX by HamadaMark we ask Allah reconcile and repay
NVDA held at $195 with a nice rebound to the $225–$235 ATH target zone. I missed this trade setup while I was offline, but the plan was in place! NVDA It's A Temporary Pullback OR Retracement Starting! for NASDAQ:NVDA by HamadaMark we ask Allah reconcile and repay
#INTC Is It Time to Book Profits? for NASDAQ:INTC by HamadaMark — TradingView
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @WildStonks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Did any of you guys traded INTC, QCOM, Copper based on shared ideas?
- Yes I got a chance.10%
- No, I did not.90%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 29 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,279,086 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WildStocks (Stonks)” (@WildStonks), 256 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WildStonks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.