2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 913–915 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 01:01
914
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:00
914
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
79
Videos
1
Links
78
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
2,630 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
937
35.6%
👍
797
30.3%
🔥
786
29.9%
👏
49
1.86%
🤩
45
1.71%
❤🔥
7
0.266%
👌
6
0.228%
😱
2
0.076%
😁
1
0.038%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,630reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2025 to 26 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
24
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 20 we hold a reading for · 70%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @WildMinerHash. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 May 2025 to 26 October 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
WILD ECOSYSTEM is heading to Dubai! 🌍
We’re proud to announce that Wild Ecosystem will be part of Blockchain Life 2025, one of the biggest global blockchain events taking place on October 28–29 in Dubai.
Wild Ecosystem unites Mining, VPN, Wallet, LegalTech, and AI under one token — creating a single digital infrastructure for freedom and innovation.
We’re coming to connect with investors, exchanges, and Web3 partne…
🚀 WM goes global.
This is not just a listing — it’s a shift from idea to movement.
Everyone who has been with us from the start will witness Wild becoming a global force.
📅 December 21 — the day that enters Wild’s history.
⚡️ Get ready.
Next comes growth, scale, and a new set of rules.
#WildEcosystem #WildListing #IAmWritingHistory
🔥 The marketing launch has begun!
Wild Ecosystem is getting ready for the WM-coin listing.
But we’ll decide it together with you 💎
⚡ Cast your vote — we’re building the future of the ecosystem together!
🎁 Telegram gifts priced like a supercar — a new in-app economy
In the TON ecosystem, a headline deal just happened inside Telegram’s gifts platform: a Porsche 911 GT3 was traded for 18 rare digital gifts. According to participants, about $20,000 was originally put into those gifts, while the car’s market price is $350,000+.
What it signals for miners:
• Digital assets inside Telegram now carry real value and liquidi…
⛏️ Today: Nearly $1B outflows from BTC/ETH ETFs — what miners should do
Spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs recorded nearly $1B in net outflows in a single day (~$533M from BTC funds and ~$422M from ETH funds). Fidelity led the outflows, while BlackRock’s IBIT saw none. The market is cooling after fresh highs.
What it means for us:
• Price may swing, but WildMinerHash mining mechanics don’t change — conditions are equal, an…
💥 We’re Live!
Subscribe, follow the activities, and grab prizes from the team.
What to do right now:
Subscribe to all our socials — the first content and tasks will drop there (TikTok and YouTube are already active).
Turn on notifications in our Telegram channel and chat so you don’t miss the start.
Join giveaways and challenges — reposts, comments, and mentions count.
Why join:
— The more active you are, the h…
⚡️ 3 quick wins for miners (no “timing” myths)
For clarity: mining is equal for everyone, and your share depends on how many active miners there are at the distribution moment. Quests and events do not affect the mining formula.
1. Boosts = speed.
Turn them on anytime. A boost increases your hashes per second (shares), which means more attempts to catch a block → higher odds under equal conditions.
2. Be online at…
🚀 Altcoins are gaining momentum—how not to miss the trend?
The crypto market is on the rise again: total capitalization has moved back above $4 trillion
Among altcoins, Solana leads the charge with +15 % in 24 hours, while Cardano and Dogecoin have added 11.7 % and 9.1 %
Yet the “Altcoin Season” index is still sitting at 41 out of 100, which means the market hasn’t entered a full-fledged altseason just yet.
💡 …
🚀 Monday kicks off with #CryptoNEWS — here’s what’s moving the market this week:
• Tuesday, August 12 — U.S. CPI at 08:30 ET. July inflation: a key driver of risk appetite and altcoin volatility.
• Thursday, August 14 — U.S. PPI at 08:30 ET. Producer prices will hint at the Fed’s next moves.
• Friday, August 15 — U.S. Retail Sales & Michigan Sentiment. The week’s macro finale.
• OPEC report (Tue). Fuel for the oil–d…
📲 Mobile Mining with WildMinerHash — Simple, Engaging, Secure!
Tired of complex bots with no guidance and monotonous clicker games? WildMinerHash breaks the mold:
❌ No menu overload or endless commands — intuitive prompts tell you exactly what to tap and when.
❌ No boredom — gamification, daily quests, and achievements keep the process exciting.
❌ Trust first — transparent algorithms, fair reward distribution, and …
Hey there!
🚀 Attention, miners! Today at 12:00 (UTC+3) we’re rolling out a major WildMinerHash update.
Friends, get ready for the next level: at exactly 12:00 we’ll introduce ad integration. What does this mean?
🔄 Free Mining is coming to the bot:
▶️ Watch short ads and earn ⚡️ energy at no cost
▶️ Every video contributes to the rewards pool without spending your own resources
▶️ One-click mining and all boosters …
❤47👍40🔥38👏4👌1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @WildMinerHash. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🎯 Help Us Choose Priority Features for WildEcosystem!
Our ecosystem is growing, and you decide what we build next. Here’s a quick overview of each option—so you can weigh the benefits and vote.
1️⃣ In-bot Swap Lightning-fast token swaps directly in the bot.19%
2️⃣ NFT Mining Mine unique digital collectibles and artifacts19%
3️⃣ P2P Marketplace A secure peer-to-peer exchange50%
4️⃣ AI Assistant An intelligent helper that tells you when to activate boosters.0%
5️⃣ Staking Dashboard A unified interface for staking13%
6️⃣ WildVPN Integration Pay for private traffic with ecosystem tokens.0%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2025 to 26 October 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 38,194 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@WildMinerHash named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@wildminerhash_support named in 14 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WildMinerHash” (@WildMinerHash), 914 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WildMinerHash.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
