Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Whale Sniper 🐳

Channel

Whale Sniper 🐳

@WhaleSnipernews

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

616subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002144652988
TypeChannel
Username@WhaleSnipernews
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/WhaleSnipernews

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6116216167 August 2026 — 611 subscribers7 August 2026 — 613 subscribers8 August 2026 — 613 subscribers16 August 2026 — 616 subscribers23 August 2026 — 621 subscribers29 August 2026 — 618 subscribers5 September 2026 — 617 subscribers12 September 2026 — 616 subscribers7 August 202612 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 36 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 610–623 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 15:59616-1
5 Sept 2026, 00:58617-1
29 Aug 2026, 08:46618-3
23 Aug 2026, 09:28621+5
16 Aug 2026, 08:56616+3
8 Aug 2026, 03:03613no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:24613+2
7 Aug 2026, 12:51611first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

24 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👏625.0%
🔥520.8%
416.7%
🤯312.5%
28.33%
🤣28.33%
👍14.17%
🙏14.17%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2026 to 2 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 May 2026, 19:31 UTC440 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

La estructura de Bitcoin se ve realmente bien aquí. - Ruptura y reprueba de la tendencia bajista de 7 meses - Recuperación del EMA de 20W por primera vez desde octubre de 2025 - MACD mostrando un fuerte impulso ¿Cómo diablos #BTC no está ya en $85k? 🆔 @WhaleSniperNews

👏2

2 May 2026, 18:44 UTC427 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

La misma señal que desencadenó la corrida alcista de 2017 está aquí. El PMI de ISM alcanzó hoy los 52,7, superando los 51 por cuarto mes consecutivo. Las dos últimas veces que esto ocurrió fueron en enero de 2017 y septiembre de 2020. Ambas precedieron a repuntes de altcoins de varios meses a escala histórica. ISM es un punto de datos de fabricación estadounidense que mide la expansión económica. Cuando ISM supera

🔥2🤣21

1 May 2026, 20:31 UTC318 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🚀 Top Trending Coins (Today) 1. MEGA 2. UB 3. ACN 4. HYPE 5. PENGU 6. MON 7. DOGE 8. LUNC 9. SKR 10. BTC 11. LAB 12. SOL 13. CARDS 14. PROS 15. ETH 🆔 @WhaleSniperNews

🔥2

30 Apr 2026, 06:40 UTC≈1,290 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Sulta emojis 🔥 Si ya estás casi listo con migo

👏42🔥1

30 Apr 2026, 06:30 UTC≈1,250 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Estaremos pronto reabriendo el VIP de señales Mantente al tanto 😎🥳

🙏1

30 Apr 2026, 06:30 UTC≈1,170 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Saludos familia #crypto Casi estamos al 100% de vuelta al espacio criptográfico 🧡 Quien les habla, el señor @ballenacn Ya casi en línea nuevamente, no olviden de dejar su maravilloso "me gusta"

3

29 Apr 2026, 22:03 UTC236 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Cancelar orden , vamos a buscar posiciones en Short

🤯3

26 Apr 2026, 13:14 UTC306 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

✅Análisis para dejar que se desarrollen: 📊BTC/USDT LONG ✔️Entrada: 72187 - 68999 🤩TP Final: 83830 🚫Stop loss: 66180 ⭐️Apalancamiento: 10x Max 🆔@WhaleSniperNews

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @WhaleSnipernews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Señales de Criptomonedas Futuros
@Criptomonedas_senales · 25,381
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
Crypto ₿allena 🐳
@crypto_ballena_oficial · 24,399
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Whale Sniper 🐳” (@WhaleSnipernews), 616 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WhaleSnipernews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.