Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for WeirdWise

Channel

WeirdWise

@WeirdWiseart

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

173subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002249201392
TypeChannel
Username@WeirdWiseart
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/WeirdWiseart

Growth

172173172.56 August 2026 — 172 subscribers8 August 2026 — 172 subscribers14 August 2026 — 173 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 172–173 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 02:14173+1
8 Aug 2026, 14:31172no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:03172first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 5 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
62.6%
avg views ÷ 173 subscribers
Avg views / post
108
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
18.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held12 (5 June 20263 August 2026)
Views total867
Reactions total163
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

273 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53683531960602052146824.9%
custom 52605950306990411824717.2%
custom 53528858935458737884616.8%
3011.0%
custom 5350325736555173853238.42%
custom 6042083610314412055228.06%
custom 5287723319745860702155.49%
custom 5312155915519020366114.03%
🌭103.66%
💋10.366%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 273reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 12 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @WeirdWiseart. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 June 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 01:26 UTC47 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ого #пост #фд #скетч

custom 52605950306990411827custom 53683531960602052146custom 53503257365551738532custom 52877233197458607021custom 60420836103144120551

Signed WᴇirdWisᴇ #IAʍJᴀᴋᴇ

28 Jul 2026, 14:49 UTC94 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ёма Ёёёмааа Ёмааааа падём гулять🥺 Да, три картинки за сегодня, ачё😎 #пост #фд #скетч

custom 53528858935458737889custom 60420836103144120554custom 52605950306990411822

Signed WᴇirdWisᴇ #IAʍJᴀᴋᴇ

28 Jul 2026, 10:05 UTC121 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

https://t.me/dyingswan777/7029 С днём рождения ещё раз! Вы тоже поздравьте тётю свен, она ваще суперский человек 😡

🌭10custom 53528858935458737883custom 52605950306990411821custom 53503257365551738531custom 60420836103144120551

Signed WᴇirdWisᴇ #IAʍJᴀᴋᴇ

28 Jul 2026, 07:54 UTC97 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

О боже, он нарисовал... Он.. он... А вообще от нечего делать по своеобразному запросу из чата нарисовался Венти, вот, да🤷‍♂️ #пост #фд #скетч

custom 535288589354587378811custom 52605950306990411827custom 60420836103144120557custom 53503257365551738531

Signed WᴇirdWisᴇ #IAʍJᴀᴋᴇ

26 Jul 2026, 22:34 UTC96 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

А я чё хуже что ли, тоже ишак🕺 Я ж завербовал Микиту в ишака #пост #фд #скетч

custom 52605950306990411827custom 53528858935458737884custom 535032573655517385321custom 52877233197458607021custom 60420836103144120551

Signed WᴇirdWisᴇ #IAʍJᴀᴋᴇ

21 Jul 2026, 15:16 UTC128 views26 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Скарабуба (Подпись предложена главным донатером звёзд этого канала) Upd. Спасибо за звёздочку 😏 #пост #фд #арт

12custom 53683531960602052146custom 52605950306990411824custom 60420836103144120552custom 53503257365551738531custom 53528858935458737881

Signed WᴇirdWisᴇ #IAʍJᴀᴋᴇ

19 Jul 2026, 17:56 UTC140 views31 reactions4 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️ Опа, редрав пвфдвх с Микитой! ☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️ Мы оба будем рады реактам и репостам🥺 Upd. Спасибо за звёздочку!🙏 Upd2. Спасибо за три звёздочки 😏 Upd3. За четыре🙏 #пост #фд #арт #коллаб

custom 528772331974586070213custom 53121559155190203667custom 535032573655517385342custom 53683531960602052142💋1custom 53528858935458737881custom 60420836103144120551

Signed WᴇirdWisᴇ #IAʍJᴀᴋᴇ

18 Jul 2026, 21:01 UTC144 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

9custom 53503257365551738535custom 52605950306990411821custom 53528858935458737881

Signed WᴇirdWisᴇ #IAʍJᴀᴋᴇ

13 Jul 2026, 15:01 UTC165 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 #пост #фд #скетч

custom 536835319606020521414custom 52605950306990411826custom 531215591551902036641

Signed WᴇirdWisᴇ #IAʍJᴀᴋᴇ

5 Jul 2026, 21:00 UTC463 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Риииибятаааа мне многа лет😎😎😎 Да, всё верно, у меня сегодня день рождения! Я немного аэээ... Ну я в шоке полагаю, что не забросил канал, и что вы всё ещё не бросили меня😊. За этот год я сильно прогресснул в плане артов и стал больше рисовать именно для себя, что меня радует. Спасибо каждому, кто остался тут и поддерживает меня🌟 Был бы рад репосту этого поста с моими картиночками🥺 #пост

custom 536835319606020521418custom 52605950306990411827custom 60420836103144120553custom 53528858935458737881

Signed WᴇirdWisᴇ #IAʍJᴀᴋᴇ

16 Jun 2026, 11:16 UTC402 views26 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Что-то произошлооо.... Upd. Оооой, спасибо за звёздочки!!!🙏 #пост #ос #скетч

custom 535288589354587378815custom 53683531960602052147custom 52605950306990411823custom 60420836103144120551

Signed WᴇirdWisᴇ #IAʍJᴀᴋᴇ

5 Jun 2026, 00:58 UTC349 views30 reactions4 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🌟, но это Микита Upd. Спасибо за звёздочку!🙏 Upd2. Спасибо за ещё одну!🙏 Upd3. Огооо, спасибо за ещё звёздочку!🙏 Upd4. 😏спасибо за ещё одну #пост #ос #арт

custom 536835319606020521415custom 535032573655517385375custom 52605950306990411822custom 60420836103144120551

Signed WᴇirdWisᴇ #IAʍJᴀᴋᴇ

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @WeirdWiseart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 145,505 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“WeirdWise” (@WeirdWiseart), 173 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WeirdWiseart.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.