Posted without readable text

Channel
币圈迷航
@Web3Temple
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
680subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002082591302 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Web3Temple |
| Description | 深水信息,不喂糖。解构 Web3 背后的逻辑。 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 17 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Web3Temple |
Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 680 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 2 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.15%
- avg views ÷ 680 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 35.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 July 2025 – 1 August 2026) |
| Views total | 35 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 19:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 544
- Videos
- 45
- Links
- 639
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 42s
- Average length
- 14s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
26 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 17 | 65.4% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 19.2% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 7.69% | |
| custom 5334952566839068354 | 1 | 3.85% | |
| custom 5942829115127106836 | 1 | 3.85% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2025 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
You guys underestimating $DEDUSTFUND. This is not just another meme. This is the official DeDust Intern play and it’s sitting at under 10K MCAP Why this is one of the biggest narratives you’re fading: • DeDust = PancakeSwap of BNB Chain + Jupiter of Solana on TON • The Intern wallet has enough $GRAM to buy back 10%+ of the entire supply • That same wallet is already sitting on a $2,000+ memecoin bag • The …
🟩 DEDUSTFUND BUY - 💎 DeDust 💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼💼 💎 219.5 Gram ($351) | +28.4% 🪙 25,934,726.79 DEDUSTFUND 💵 Price: $0.0₄148 🏦 FDV: $14.61K | 💧 LP: $5.98K 👤 pizza-kebab.ton | 628.59 Gram 📊 Dexscreener | 👁️ Transaction 📌 Tracker | 🔥 Trending 📈 DTrade DC4 | 📈 Maestro | 📈 Tinu | 🔺 Not.Trade
Pavel Durov just liked the post: “Will it read the Tao Te Ching?” He didn't just see it. He confirmed it. The path has been noticed from above. 道德経 is not just a meme. It's a message. And the founder just liked it. 多年不变。 Bullish. Quiet. But loud where it matters. 道 $道德經 https://x.com/fuzhuchaorou/status/2057478155859054600
👍 TON: The Comeback & My Toolkit It’s been almost a year since my last post. Let’s be real: TON was in a coma. The volumes vanished, we got "shaved" and the disappointment was heavy. It was easier to just walk away than to trade in an empty market. But things are shifting. After Durov’s recent posts, the pulse is back. The volumes are still modest, but compared to two months ago, the market is waking up. The "brothe…
👍5
🏁 TON leads Layer-1 blockchains in finality time. 🔗 Sources: https://telegra.ph/Comparison-of-Layer-1-blockchains-by-finalization-time-05-01
🔥1
币圈迷航 pinned a photo
Doodles UP 也搞了自己的 TMA 又一个项目开始走“贴纸 → 游戏 → 代币”的老路,这次轮到 Doodles UP。外观和 Pengu Clash 几乎一模一样,估计是同一批人做的。 👍 如果真是那样,那游戏质量就别抱太大期望了,估计也就是差不多的“普通水平”。 🥱 目前玩法和以前差不多: 🔘加入等待名单 🔘关注官方账号 🔘拉朋友升级宝箱 🔗 打开机器人
🫡2
加密幻象 BTC 达到历史最高点 $123,000,但各类头条往往只是一场精心策划的营销。 🧐 “沉睡”钱包的苏醒 🔘长期未动的大额比特币突然开始转出,仿佛老持有者“醒来了”。 🔘但这并不意味着大涨——约有四分之一的 BTC 存在于无法访问的遗失地址。 💼 机构“买入”闹剧 🔘关于“巨额买入”的报告,往往伴随相同规模的做空操作。 🔘基金账面上买入 BTC,却同时开空仓,实际“零买入”,却能美化财报并推高价格。 💵 “数字美元”再发行 🔘新一轮“数字美元”发行,为市场注入数十亿美元级的 USDT 类代币。 🧾 主流应用中的加密功能 🔘大型银行和金融科技服务在手机端直接加上“购买 BTC”按钮。 🔘支付系统也在测试区块链方案,包装成“新一代数字便捷”。 🖊 投资者须知 别被噱头蒙蔽——深入挖掘数据。 以年为周期,而非季度:情绪化抛售往往导致亏损。 小额持有者的损失,往往是大玩家的利润。 👍 依托自有 on‑chain …
👍1
TON 的 NFT 策略升级了?我们看到了什么 🤔 需要注意什么? TON 推出的新模型被称为“IP(Intellectual Property,知识产权)激活的可持续经济”,但本质上还是那个熟悉的 Tap-to-Earn,只是换了个 Play-to-Win 的包装。 经典路径如下: 贴纸 → 社区 → 游戏/小程序 → 品牌代币 用户仍然需要为 IP 付费、参与游戏,并最终获得平台自有的代币,期望回本。 🎙 Jack Booth 的核心观点: 🔘IP 机制: 依赖知名品牌(如 Pudgy Penguins、BAYC、Snoop Dogg)来吸引用户。 🔘Play-to-Win 取代 Tap-to-Earn: 奖金池由用户共同组成,减少平台风险。 🔘贴纸 → 游戏 → 代币: 当前还处于 V0 阶段,产品收益支持尚未落地。 🔘项目筛选严格: Ton Foundation 只与真正创造价值的团队合作。 🔘新的 DeFi 功…
🔥1
VOOI:跨链永续合约终端 该项目自称是一个跨链永续合约 DEX 聚合器,背后有 Binance 投资。你可以看看他们的主平台:https://app.vooi.io/ (新手不建议参与永续合约) 他们还推出了 Telegram 应用,可用于模拟交易。模式是:学习 + 模拟交易(加密货币、外汇、黄金、指数)。 🔘仅支持做多 / 做空 🔘完成任务可获得 VT 积分 🔘无需投入资金,零成本体验 🔘适合随便玩玩,顺便积累未来可能用得上的积分 🤔 目前是第二季,第一季似乎还没发奖励,但整体做得不错 —— 界面干净、功能精简。 🔗 点击进入 VooiAppBot 机器人
🔥1
Telegram 礼物和贴纸 ≠ Meme 币 它们在视觉和社区驱动上看起来相似,但运作机制完全不同。 Meme币: 🔘有订单簿:可以看到买卖需求 🔘流动性:可部分/全部卖出 🔘可以随时止盈或止损 🔘持币结构清晰,链上公开可查 🔘价格由市场决定,而不是所谓的 “floor” 🔘缺点:新手难以上手,需要理解机器人、DEX 等工具 Telegram 礼物 和 贴纸: 🔘没有订单簿 —— 价格完全由情绪和叙事驱动 🔘Floor price 并不等于一定能卖出 —— 需要真实买家 🔘无法部分卖出或快速退出仓位 🔘新用户很难理解哪些图是“稀有”的,哪些不是 🔘经常要等待买家出现 🔘看似有流动性,但实际上资产可能长期挂单卖不掉 ℹ️ NFT 只是图片。 如果不能轻松兑换或出售,它们就失去了作为资产的意义。而随着 Telegram 内发行的 NFT 数量不断增加,二级市场的压力也越来越大。Meme 币可以随时“滑进 TON”。NFT …
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Web3Temple. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@BabyDogeAnnZH · 90,151
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 August 2026
@losgamecoin · 336,385
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“币圈迷航” (@Web3Temple), 680 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Web3Temple.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.