Channel
@WeCopyTradess
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
173subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002141595371 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @WeCopyTradess |
| Description | Copy Trading Dm Only @Vtechwriter @Theweb3scout Join the group for support https://t.me/CopyTradersHub |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/WeCopyTradess |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 173 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 173 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 1 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
74 reactions across 18 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 40 | 54.1% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 14.9% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 6.76% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 4.05% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 4.05% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 2.70% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 1.35% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 1.35% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 1.35% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 1.35% | |
| 👨💻 | 1 | 1.35% | |
| 👻 | 1 | 1.35% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.35% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 1.35% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 1.35% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 1.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 December 2025 to 17 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The copy trading space evolved very quickly since 2025 Let's talk about some major changes Old Existing hype: Copy trading still exist ofcourse 😅 the same strategies, there aren't new outstanding tools rather old tools are adding more features so check your old bots. Old trading bots that LOCKED IN 🔥 Fasol: they are moving towards auto trading alerts, you can filter those alerts too I love the results I get durin…
⚡2🔥1
72 Hours Over! The Big Update is finally here 💥🔥 The Dynamic Filter feature is LIVE. We are several steps ahead of every scraper!! This is not just static filtering, you can filter numbers in ranges, text in variations and combine different filtering methods. It is just the beginning... We made a documentation on our group https://t.me/CopyTradersHub/7050/7062 We will be making a video on this too Your First Updat…
🔥2👏1
You can get the daily 2 months recent calls from the scrapechain bot, not posting it here today Let's get back to our tutorials and copy updates, scrapechain is going well thanks to you guys, we have been focusing on blazing bot more, I love the security system they have, it's pretty strict with degen mode disabled but that's the point so it's a win for auto-buy SO much is happening with copy trading. I owe you guy…
🔥2👀1
New Bot Update 🔈🔄 - The bot is now more resilient to avoid forwarding fails due to different telegram data centers. - We upgraded the forwarding speed during bulk volume forward. Your First Update? In the server, go to "Startup" and change Auto update from 0 to 1 then click save. With this everytime there is a new update it is automatically uploaded to your server.
🔥2👏1
Everyday we post 2 months recent calls from your favorite callers to help you make better decisions and manage expectations to avoid hype traps. Today @RiskyGemsHuntersCalls is been closely examined. Telegram Here is the data from the photo: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1q3kPt83Cv6O5Oyk-fsdT-FMCIJMOeepDjQczBPVPKGE/edit?usp=sharing Time: When it was posted by the caller Win/Lost: If the token rises above …
🔥2👻1
Everyday we post 2 months recent calls from your favorite callers to show you the bigger picture you fail to see, today DoxxedGambles is been closely examined. Here is the data from the video: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1czhVnGB0Fol-wpCRnzO6-6rXftampKe9Dv11FXnCJ4c/edit?usp=sharing Time: When it was posted by the caller Win/Lost: If the token rises above 100% L -H: L stand for the price within the timefr…
🔥2❤🔥1👍1
This is the right link 😅 Here is the data in the video for bschousesignal: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LUW352ip3H7cWUaRXdVQTjdjjccL1lkvo2rYzKPOU/edit?usp=sharing I'll continue to share this on @ScrapeChainBot everyday.
🔥2👨💻1
I am on a journey to help you see the degen bigger picture, everyday we will dismantle the hype around your favorite channel by analyzing all their calls in the past 2 months Today we dismantle @bschousesignal, Would you still follow them after this? Here is the data in the video: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1LUW352ip3H7cWUaRXdVQTjdjjccL1lkvo2rYzKPOU/edit?gid=0#gid=0 I'll continue to share this on @Scra…
👍2👏1🔥1
In the past one year I have analysed at least 1000 channels using dune, It helped me cut out 90% of the channels I follow I'll start sharing the analysis with you guys, this is for @DextoolsCalls and @bruisersgamble. bruisersgambles: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1uXgIt83lmCGHQ19FLhdM10SM6RfBUR8yUdAspwPqhPI/edit?usp=sharing DextoolsCalls: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1L9xTFcwWUagfZUHAMdJIwamCH6c…
🔥6🐳1
Upgrade After the First Community Feature Votes ❤🔥🍻 It's been awesome, we did our first community vote. The most requested feature has been added Now the bot no longer stops you from buying duplicate addresses forever, you can also choose how long the "No duplication" rule will last through the new duplicate timer. This will continue, every once in a while I will put out a request to the community to request a fea…
🏆1👏1🔥1
WRECKED 💀 devs have also been coping our bot's code to modify it 😂 At least we know they LOVE IT Both scraping bots Blazing bot scraper and dbot scraper are now private. Video Tutorial Update! The video tutorial for blazing bot scraper setup on desktop and cloud (24/7) is up, I made a playlist https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLh36Yg1zlAmP5wPx7TWNlgk96nznHp2z2
🔥3🎉1🤩1
Dbot Scraper Verification Fixed!! Some people complaining they could not verify addresses. It now works for everybody.
⚡1🏆1🔥1😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @WeCopyTradess. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 614,933 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“We Copy Trades ©️” (@WeCopyTradess), 173 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WeCopyTradess.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.