Trump called the Washington Post report as "fake news."

Channel
WarZone Updates 🪖
@WarZoneUpdates
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
697subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002626591947 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @WarZoneUpdates |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/WarZoneUpdates |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 697 | -4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 04:17 | 701 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:28 | 702 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 703 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 18.0%
- avg views ÷ 697 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 126
- 19 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.46%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 19
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (2 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,388 |
| Reactions total | 46 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 00:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
46 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💩 | 16 | 34.8% | |
| 🤣 | 11 | 23.9% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 19.6% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 15.2% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 2.17% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 2.17% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 2.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🇺🇸⚡WaPo reports Trump confronted Secretary of War Pete Hegseth at Camp David over severe U.S. munitions shortages, claiming he was misled. Trump stated he believed the issue was fixed. Hegseth blamed Deputy Secretary of War Stephen Feinberg for not fully informing Trump. The White House denies the report; Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt called it "100% fake news" and "literally never happened," affirming Trump's con…
🇺🇸⚡CNN reports Trump is privately angry about public reports on shrinking U.S. missile stockpiles, believing they make the U.S. appear weak while he pressures Iran to negotiate.
PM Modi posted new insta reel PM Modi urged the nation to celebrate handloom day and promote local textile industry on 7th August
💩4🍌1
Congress is opposing FCRA Bill - Pakistan is opposing FCRA Bill - USA is opposing FCRA Bill - UK is opposing FCRA Bill - Missionaries are opposing FCRA Bill - Churches are opposing FCRA Bill - NGOs are opposing FCRA Bill - Liberals are opposing FCRA Bill All anti-national elements are opposing this bill. So, this bill will certainly be very good for India.
🤣4❤2👍1
Missionaries and Madarsas got a major hit. US announces major policy change As India prepares to introduce new FCRA regulations to tighten oversight of foreign funding despite both internal and external pressure, the U.S. has announced a Major POLICY SHIFT. The U.S. government says foreign aid will now be provided directly to national governments, rather than routed through NGOs. "If the goal is to help a country,…
❤2
🚨 Breaking: A bomb attack has reportedly targeted the residence of top Bangladeshi cricketer Shakib Al Hasan, just hours after he attended Sheikh Hasina's press conference in New Delhi.
"ISI has an open hand in Bangladesh. Bangladesh is becoming another Pakistan. Hundreds of militants we had arrested have been released..This is a problem for India and the world", said Shiekh Hasina's son Joy. Shiekh Hasina statements in FCC presser: "I will return to my people, I know, they will put me in jail, or kill me says Hasina on her return, Doesn't responds to the date of her return. Ban on Awami league be …
FCRA bill in LS tomorrow
⚡1
Pakistan blocked Al Jazeera and tightened foreign media rules, requiring a No Objection Certificate (NOC) for reporting outside Islamabad, Lahore, and Karachi. The Pakistan govt accused the media of "yellow journalism" regarding its coverage of elections and unrest in PoK.
🤣6
India invites Bangladesh PM Tarique Rahman to attend BRICS Summit
💩4🤣1
PM To Visit Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan As India Eyes Bigger Role In Central Asia Before travelling to Uzbekistan, the Prime Minister will attend the SCO Summit in Kyrgyzstan.
💩3
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @WarZoneUpdates. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 305,225 of 1,584,420entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WarZone Updates 🪖” (@WarZoneUpdates), 697 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WarZoneUpdates.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.