Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for WaarheidsVaccin

Channel

WaarheidsVaccin

@WaarheidsVaccin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

29subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001408524827
TypeChannel
Username@WaarheidsVaccin
Created2 March 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/WaarheidsVaccin

Growth

297 August 2026 — 29 subscribers11 August 2026 — 29 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28–30 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 05:0129no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:0329first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.7%
avg views ÷ 29 subscribers
Avg views / post
5.4
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held14 (6 August 202610 August 2026)
Views total76
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 05:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
8,490
Videos
4,760
Links
11,100

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 08:07 UTC5 viewsread 11 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/live/haggdJjc0zI?si=YuZdo678rd0NULcV

7 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC5 viewsread 11 August 2026

https://klimaatgek.nl/wordpress/2026/08/06/drinkwatertekort/

6 Aug 2026, 07:06 UTC6 viewsread 11 August 2026

UN GATE INNER CITY PRESS PATRICK HO CEFC CHINA ENERGY https://t.me/toresaysPlus/97984 the person whose UN-linked bribery case Inner City Press has hammered for years is the same person whose company paid Hunter Biden $1 million for legal representation while that case was unfolding. The Grassley–Johnson bank records and the UN Gate reporting are two different investigative tracks that converge on the identical CEFC

6 Aug 2026, 07:06 UTC7 viewsread 11 August 2026

What is UN GATE? UN GATE is the label that Inner City Press (Matthew Russell Lee) uses for its ongoing coverage of the United Nations under Secretary-General António Guterres, centered on the reporter’s physical expulsion and indefinite ban from UN Headquarters. Core meaning • Origin: On or around 3–5 July 2018, Lee was physically removed by UN security while covering a budget/Fifth Committee meeting. His credentia

6 Aug 2026, 07:05 UTC6 viewsread 11 August 2026

UN GATE INNER CITY PRESS https://medium.com/@innercitypress/un-briber-china-energy-fund-cttee-belatedly-challenged-in-ngo-cttee-un-omits-patrick-ho-and-sg-e7136ca7c047 Direct links from the article and related Inner City Press reporting The Medium piece (by Matthew Russell Lee / Inner City Press) covers the China Energy Fund Committee (CEFC), Patrick Ho’s 2018 U.S. conviction for UN-related bribery, money launderin

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @WaarheidsVaccin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“WaarheidsVaccin” (@WaarheidsVaccin), 29 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WaarheidsVaccin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.