Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Q Clearance Patriot

@WWG1WGA347

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

402subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003519395479
TypeChannel
Username@WWG1WGA347
Created18 July 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/WWG1WGA347

Growth

402405403.56 August 2026 — 403 subscribers6 August 2026 — 405 subscribers6 August 2026 — 405 subscribers13 August 2026 — 402 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 402–405 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 15:08402-3
6 Aug 2026, 19:33405no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:41405+2
6 Aug 2026, 08:48403first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
584.1%
avg views ÷ 402 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,350
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held18 (18 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total39,920
Reactions total629
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

629 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
28845.8%
🏆8613.7%
🔥8413.4%
👍6310.0%
528.27%
🙏426.68%
🤔71.11%
🤝40.636%
🎉30.477%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 629reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 22:24 UTC≈8,790 views27 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Does it get any more obvious, Patriots? RUSSIA. USA. CHINA. New partnerships. Common enemy. “What if China, Russia, and others are coordinating with POTUS to eliminate the NWO?” Coincidence? Trust POTUS. Watch the alliances. @WWG1WGA347 Q

🔥19🏆52🤔1

3 Aug 2026, 13:17 UTC≈1,260 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Law enforcement should interview the therapists. EACH SHOOTER has one coincidentally. Targets? Relocation within 30 days of each shooting? New name? FBI doesn’t know this? Spooks are hard to find? Dream to reality. @WWG1WGA347 Q

10👍7🤔53🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 12:48 UTC551 views48 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Be vigilant. See something. Say something. Know your surroundings at all times. @WWG1WGA347 Q

32👍10🏆5🙏1

29 Jul 2026, 09:48 UTC≈1,680 views49 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

One hand in the darkness. One message above the crowd. @WWG1WGA347 Q

28🙏10🔥5👍42

27 Jul 2026, 13:56 UTC≈1,870 views51 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Public channels. Official voices. Echoing what was once buried. Time. Dimensions. Healing beyond known limits. Signals once ignored… now repeated. Coincidence? Or coordinated awakening. Why now? Why all at once? Think. Those who watched early remember. Those who listened… understand. The lines between fiction and reality are dissolving. Nothing is random. Nothing. The narrative shifts. The message spreads.

27🙏145🏆4👍1

26 Jul 2026, 08:23 UTC≈2,780 views50 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Division is their weapon. Unity is ours. One voice can be ignored. Millions cannot. Do not retreat. Do not surrender the truth. Overwhelm the darkness with courage, numbers, and resolve. They need the people to forget. Remember. @WWG1WGA347 Q

32👍11🔥7

25 Jul 2026, 12:45 UTC938 views29 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Controlled test. Uncontrolled consequence. The door was not broken. It was left open. Watch the builders. @WWG1WGA347 Q

🔥194🤝4🏆1👍1

24 Jul 2026, 11:15 UTC≈3,180 views59 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Very soon. Where the signal went. What happened in the silence. Who attempted to erase it. All will be revealed. The core must gather. Believers. Followers. Those who remember. Bring them here. This group is the new ground. The truth cannot move through an empty room. Signal the others. @WWG1WGA347 Q

36🏆118👍4

23 Jul 2026, 17:08 UTC899 views31 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://x.com/sgtnewsnetwork/status/2080013683166748857 Silence speaks. A nation remembers. Honor never dies. @WWG1WGA347 Q

15🙏8🏆5👍21

22 Jul 2026, 09:08 UTC779 views49 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Q is back. The masses must know. Friends. Foes. All must see. Carry the signal. Break the silence. @WWG1WGA347 Q

27🏆11🔥6👍41

21 Jul 2026, 20:21 UTC≈1,360 views40 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Be aware of false prophets. I am not a prophet. You are not a prophet. We are not prophets. Focus on the mission. @WWG1WGA347 Q

🔥17🏆1163👍3

20 Jul 2026, 21:52 UTC≈1,150 views44 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Directive received. The chain is active. Consequences follow. @WWG1WGA347 Q

2513🏆5🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @WWG1WGA347. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 230,652 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Q Clearance Patriot” (@WWG1WGA347), 402 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WWG1WGA347.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.