Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ЗАРАБОТАЙ НА WB «С 2 ИРАМИ»

@WB_Irina

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,877subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001786485481
TypeChannel
Username@WB_Irina
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/WB_Irina

Growth

1,8771,8891,8837 August 2026 — 1,889 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,889 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,888 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,885 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,877 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,875–1,891 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:151,877-8
10 Aug 2026, 10:281,885-3
7 Aug 2026, 16:071,888-1
7 Aug 2026, 08:321,889no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:281,889first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 2 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

144 reactions across 12 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4329.9%
🔥3121.5%
👍2618.1%
💯96.25%
🤣85.56%
😁64.17%
❤‍🔥42.78%
🥰42.78%
😢32.08%
😱32.08%
👏21.39%
🗿21.39%
🎄10.694%
🙏10.694%
🤪10.694%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 144reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 2 January 2026 to 1 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Feb 2026, 14:36 UTC641 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ну очень смешно 🤣 Так и работаем, с юморком 😁

🤣3😁32👍1🔥1🤪1

31 Jan 2026, 15:07 UTC588 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Начинаем год с новых знаний 🤓

🔥52👍2

27 Jan 2026, 05:20 UTC596 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Всем доброе утро ☀️ Я вернулась с отпуска, вливаемся в рабочие будни ❤️

7🔥3❤‍🔥1👍1

8 Jan 2026, 15:26 UTC643 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Товарищи-предприниматели, у всех так? 👍

👍9💯8😢3🗿2

8 Jan 2026, 11:50 UTC569 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Последняя тренировка перед отпуском, завтра улетаю 🌴 ☀️

7🔥3👍2

7 Jan 2026, 15:25 UTC466 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🤣5😁3💯1

7 Jan 2026, 13:51 UTC435 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Штраф 120.000 за габариты.😡 ВБ нам замерили габариты по 2 артикулам, начали сыпаться штрафы, а замерили неправильно😠 Например, по одному артикулу у нас объем составляет 5.25 литра, а ВБ замерили на 7.63 литров. Я читала ранее, что если исправить габариты под замеры ВБ-значит то, что мы соглашаемся, что габариты замерены нами неверно. Поэтому менять мы ничего не стали, штрафы так и сыпятся, но сотрудник купил 2 конт

👍3😱32🙏1

6 Jan 2026, 13:09 UTC411 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вырастила себе напарника в различный движ❤️

8🔥7❤‍🔥3🥰3

5 Jan 2026, 21:11 UTC407 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Я предполагала, что январь будет более печальным по заказам, но радует, что даже 1 числа заказов насобирали❤️

🔥63👍3

5 Jan 2026, 12:02 UTC384 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Гуляете ?

  1. Да, в отрыве21%
  2. В режиме64%
  3. Как работал, так и работаю до сих пор14%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Jan 2026, 12:00 UTC357 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Как вы? Уже в режиме или в майонезной коме? Я в режиме питания и сна уже со 2 января, а алкоголь я не пью. Сегодня была уже вторая тренировка в этом году💪

🔥54👏2👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @WB_Irina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Jan 2026, 12:02 UTCAnonymous Poll14 voters

Гуляете ?

  1. Да, в отрыве21%
  2. В режиме64%
  3. Как работал, так и работаю до сих пор14%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 2 January 2026 to 1 February 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЗАРАБОТАЙ НА WB «С 2 ИРАМИ»” (@WB_Irina), 1,877 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WB_Irina.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.