Channel
@WAG1396
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
583subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001892622811 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @WAG1396 |
| Description | 文案，狗推，交流，emo 广告价格： @yw1396 聊天群： @TG1259 吃瓜频道： @cgzx1394 文案馆： @WAG1396 少女妇女： @xxoo13691 反差婊子： @mnxzNO1 口交后入： @kjxxoo 大奶子： @hrxxoo31 黄色小说： @seqingxs 投稿： @cs_vip888 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 23 May 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/WAG1396 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:15 | 583 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:04 | 583 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 May 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 September 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
107 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 55 | 51.4% | |
| 👍 | 46 | 43.0% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 2.80% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.935% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.935% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.935% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 107reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2023 to 28 September 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
中秋佳节，明月高悬，无论身在何处，那轮圆月都是我们共同的情感纽带。特此致以最真挚的祝福给远离家乡，奋斗在各个领域的你们。 虽然距离遥远，但月光为桥，愿你们在异地仍能感受到家的温暖和思念。在此中秋之际，更祝愿你们事业有成，业绩斐然，不仅仅是因为这是你们的辛勤汗水和毅力的结晶，更是因为你们用行动向家人证明，每一次的分离都是为了更好的团聚。 出门在外，有时可能会觉得孤单，但请记得，有一个地方永远是你的港湾。与此同时，愿你们在事业的道路上勇往直前，如明月般，照亮前行的路。 祝你们中秋节快乐，身体健康，业绩连连看好，未来更加光明！
❤14👍4👎1
爱或许没有定义 我个人认为，爱从来不是让人理智爱就是昏头昏脑 是一往无前 不是畏畏缩缩权衡利弊计较得失 顾及尊严 它的本质就是占有欲敏感和不清醒它的附属品就是粘人吃醋多疑如果这些都被嫌弃了还要怎么去爱呢？他认为你这不是爱，我这是痴情甚至是一种病态的喜欢。爱是责任和克制，新鲜感过后浮现出来的才是爱，爱是相互尊重又甘拜下风，爱是规格不同的两个齿轮相互磨平后，融入彼此的生活，爱是会让我们成为更好的自己 消息来源：匿名
👍10❤3👏2
🎷亚美体育官方直招🎷 不坑不骗 100%直招 🪀 福利多 🪀岗位多🪀 各种补贴 🪀年底 🪀13-14薪🪀过年7天双薪 ☔️可接赔付 ☔️绩效全勤 ☔️不压不扣 ☔️岗位不适可转岗☔️岗位多☔️全岗不禁足 ☔️2人间宿舍☔️安排打疫苗☔️全岗不禁足 ✈️✈️纸飞机： @YY88456 👩🏻🌾👩🏻🌾官方频道： 亚美体育 7月急招岗位 ☯️ 代理专员 : 8k-10k 10休2 ☯️ 引流专员 ：15k 12休2 ☯️ 维护专员 ：10k 12休2 ☯️ 推广专员 ：10k 12休2 ☯️ 代理部长 : 面议 ☯️ 招聘专员 ： 12k-15k 9休4 ☯️ 代理组长 ：面议 ☯️ …
❤5👍4👏1
希望他前途似锦太假，我要他穷困潦倒，爱而不得，我要他身边桃花无数，却无一人真心对他，我要他夜夜想起我的好，我过分吗？我要他和我一样痛苦，才算道歉。 消息来源：匿名
👍2❤1
我始终觉得，爱意就是要让对方感受到，要学会大大方方的表达爱意，而不是冷冰冰的或者讲反话。 消息来源：匿名
❤8👍2
五月五，是端午，粽子香，龙舟舞。香飘万里，舞动祝福。 祝你：生活美好，五彩缤纷，业绩长虹，五谷丰登!端午节快乐!
❤3
天下风云出我辈，一入缅北岁月催， 百万大业谈笑中，不胜人生一场醉。 按键敲盘挥鼠标，赔付如山鸟惊飞。 尘事如潮人如水，只叹缅北几人回。 消息来源：@Xiaobei88168
👍6
欣赏一下古诗词吧 消息来源： @qingrana
👍3❤2
我已经主动了，我不够有趣，我不漂亮，难道我真的就是那个不被爱的那个吗 消息来源：@niubaideren
👍1
全球华人文案馆 pinned a photo
🎷亚美体育官方直招🎷 不坑不骗 100%直招 🪀 福利多 🪀岗位多🪀 各种补贴 🪀年底 🪀13-14薪🪀过年7天双薪 ☔️可接赔付 ☔️绩效全勤 ☔️不压不扣 ☔️岗位不适可转岗☔️岗位多☔️全岗不禁足 ☔️2人间宿舍☔️安排打疫苗☔️全岗不禁足 ✈️✈️纸飞机： @YY88456 👩🏻🌾👩🏻🌾官方频道： 亚美体育 6月急招岗位 ☯️ 代理专员 : 8k-10k 10休2 ☯️ 引流专员 ：15k 12休2 ☯️ 维护专员 ：10k 12休2 ☯️ 推广专员 ：10k 12休2 ☯️ 代理部长 : 面议 ☯️ 招聘专员 ： 12k-15k 9休4 ☯️ 代理组长 ：面议 ☯️ …
“书上说，女子低头不见脚尖，便以是人间绝色，可是总有一些人一见就觉得喜欢，连道理都没得讲，我喜欢的姑娘呀，她眉如远山，所有浩然天下好看的山好看的水加起来都不如她，他睫毛轻颤的模样，落在了我心里，那万年不动的剑气长城都好像晃了晃，就像，就像山看水，水流山还在，喜欢之人只管远去，我只管喜欢” 消息来源：小玉
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @WAG1396. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,333,962 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@WAG1396 named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“全球华人文案馆” (@WAG1396), 583 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WAG1396.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.