Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for WABetaInfo - WhatsApp beta news

Channel

WABetaInfo - WhatsApp beta news

@WABetaInfo

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,281subscribers

-178 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001047081505
TypeChannel
Username@WABetaInfo
DescriptionWABetaInfo is the main source where you can discover news and real-time updates about WhatsApp. Download WhatsApp beta: https://wabetainfo.com/download/ Join TestFlight: https://wabetainfo.com/testflight/
Created26 March 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/WABetaInfo

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “WABetaInfo” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 3 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@WABetaInfo/6207 · this entry31 Jul 2026, 02:00 UTC@WhatsAppBetas/258231 Jul 2026, 09:42 UTC1.007.7 hours
@WABetaInfo/6210 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 02:00 UTC@WhatsAppBetas/25843 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC1.009.4 hours
@WABetaInfo/6214 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 02:00 UTC@WhatsAppBetas/25916 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC1.0013 hours
@WABetaInfo/6226 · this entry17 Aug 2026, 02:00 UTC@WhatsAppBetas/260517 Aug 2026, 06:51 UTC1.004.8 hours
@WABetaInfo/6307 · this entry22 Oct 2026, 02:00 UTC@WhatsAppBetas/268722 Oct 2026, 14:29 UTC1.0012 hours
@WABetaInfo/6311 · this entry26 Oct 2026, 03:00 UTC@WhatsAppBetas/269427 Oct 2026, 12:51 UTC1.0034 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@WhatsAppBetas36 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.996.1 hoursthis entry (36–0)
@Gbwhatsappupdates21 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.006.4 hoursthis entry (21–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 80 comparable posts for this entry, running 21 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 3 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @WABetaInfo — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 3 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

14,27614,45914,367.514,2815 August 202612 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 98 days, net -178. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,249–14,486 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 06:5914,281+3
10 Nov 2026, 07:1814,278-2
8 Nov 2026, 22:3814,280-9
7 Nov 2026, 16:5614,289+6
6 Nov 2026, 16:2114,283+7
5 Nov 2026, 15:5614,276-3
4 Nov 2026, 13:3514,279-1
3 Nov 2026, 15:0614,280+2
1 Nov 2026, 11:2414,278-1
31 Oct 2026, 12:3014,279-5
30 Oct 2026, 10:4714,284+1
29 Oct 2026, 13:3714,283-4
28 Oct 2026, 11:3814,287-6
27 Oct 2026, 13:1114,293-6
26 Oct 2026, 12:2814,299-6
25 Oct 2026, 10:1014,305-6
23 Oct 2026, 03:5714,311+4
22 Oct 2026, 03:5114,307-2
21 Oct 2026, 01:4014,309+5
19 Oct 2026, 04:4714,304first reading

Engagement

81 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.2%
avg views ÷ 14,281 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,030
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.738%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 81 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held81 (21 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total62,896
Reactions total464
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 19:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,140
Videos
≈11
Links
≈4,100

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1,226 reactions across 79 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,11190.6%
👎1159.38%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 81 of the 81 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,267 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 81 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 31 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 03:00 UTC776 views7 reactionsread 12 November 2026

WhatsApp is rolling out view-once text messages on Android WhatsApp is finally bringing the view-once option to text messages on Android.

👍7

11 Nov 2026, 03:00 UTC≈1,150 views12 reactionsread 12 November 2026

WhatsApp is rolling out a new bottom navigation bar on Android WhatsApp is finally introducing a floating bottom navigation bar with the latest beta update on Android.

👍11👎1

10 Nov 2026, 03:00 UTC≈1,380 views17 reactionsread 12 November 2026

WhatsApp is rolling out a new Contacts tab on iOS beta WhatsApp is rolling out a new tab where users can quickly see their contacts and if they are online.

👍14👎3

9 Nov 2026, 03:00 UTC≈1,630 views17 reactionsread 12 November 2026

WhatsApp is rolling out a new Contacts tab on Android beta WhatsApp is finally introducing a new tab to see online contacts from the bottom navigation bar on Android.

👍13👎4

8 Nov 2026, 03:00 UTC≈1,700 views14 reactionsread 12 November 2026

WhatsApp news of the week: WhatsApp introduces smart message text actions for chats This summary includes 8 updates shared this week covering WhatsApp beta for Android and iOS.

👍14

7 Nov 2026, 03:00 UTC≈1,810 views21 reactionsread 12 November 2026

WhatsApp is testing new phone number privacy for usernames WhatsApp is working on new privacy settings to let users choose who can see their phone number when they have a username on Android.

👍21

6 Nov 2026, 03:00 UTC≈1,890 views18 reactionsread 12 November 2026

WhatsApp is testing original quality media sharing on Android WhatsApp is working on a more native feature that will let users send photos and videos in their original quality.

👍17👎1

5 Nov 2026, 13:00 UTC≈1,850 views15 reactionsread 12 November 2026

WhatsApp is testing a contextual chat preview for Android WhatsApp is finally working on a new feature that will let users preview a chat without opening it.

👍15

5 Nov 2026, 10:30 UTC≈1,780 views13 reactionsread 12 November 2026

WhatsApp is rolling out a feature to expand images on iOS WhatsApp is introducing a feature that lets users expand photos in their chats and status updates.

👍13

5 Nov 2026, 03:00 UTC≈1,740 views11 reactionsread 12 November 2026

WhatsApp is rolling out AI photo expansion on Android WhatsApp is improving the drawing editor by adding a feature that lets users expand their photos.

👍11

4 Nov 2026, 03:00 UTC≈1,840 views17 reactionsread 12 November 2026

WhatsApp is rolling out chats powered by Meta AI on Android WhatsApp is making it easier for users to organize their threads with Meta AI by introducing separate conversations in the chat list.

👍10👎7

3 Nov 2026, 03:00 UTC≈1,910 views14 reactionsread 12 November 2026

WhatsApp is rolling out media suggestions on Android and iOS With the latest updates, WhatsApp is making it faster for users to share recent photos and videos in their chats.

👍14

Showing the 12 most recent of 81 posts we hold for @WABetaInfo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

MBMods
@MBMods · 435,628
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 26 here — alongside 25 others — read 9 September 2026
TurboTel
@TurboTel · 127,781
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 29 here — alongside 28 others — read 9 September 2026
GApps Leaks
@GappsLeaks · 21,678
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 23 September 2026
apkmirror.com official
@apkmirror_official · 34,145
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 10 September 2026
TestFlight Link
@TestFlightLink · 22,797
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 20 September 2026
Seal
@seal_app · 25,307
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 15 September 2026
Tech Guide
@techguide · 40,741
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 29 August 2026
YukNgaji Official
@yukngajiofficial · 19,759
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 28 September 2026
SamMobile.com - Samsung News! #TeamSAMSUNG #TeamGALAXY
@SamMobileNews · 23,453
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 19 September 2026
MyGov Newsdesk
@MyGovCoronaNewsdesk · 366,129
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
Google News | En
@google_nws · 26,232
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 12 September 2026
TestFlightX
@TestFlightX · 43,389
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 28 August 2026
Dicas do Telegram
@TelegramTipsBR · 669,728
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 August 2026
Gizchina.com
@gizchinacom · 26,394
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 11 September 2026
BSG MGC Public Release Channel
@Channel_MGC_BSG · 42,712
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 7 September 2026
Xiaomi Global™ News
@Xiaomi · 27,725
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 10 September 2026
Xiaomi Fans Home
@Mi_Global_Community · 28,852
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 9 September 2026
Andro4all
@andro4all · 36,490
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 1 September 2026
Paediatrics videos & books
@paedsvideos · 50,185
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“WABetaInfo - WhatsApp beta news” (@WABetaInfo), 14,281 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WABetaInfo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.