Journalists are ALREADY CALLING A VICTORY FOR NO/NO! WE WON! #VoteNoNo https://twitter.com/VoteNoVoteNo/status/1766407462561685857?t=XkUjxbm3gEifQ6TfWkGR2g&s=19
❤7🙏3👍1

Channel
@VoteNoVoteNo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
40subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002080314122 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @VoteNoVoteNo |
| Description | Vote No to both amendments on March 8th #VoteNoNo linktr.ee/votenono |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 28 January 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/VoteNoVoteNo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 40 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 40 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 28 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
129 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 48 | 37.2% | |
| 👏 | 33 | 25.6% | |
| ❤ | 19 | 14.7% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 6.98% | |
| 🙏 | 8 | 6.20% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 4.65% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 2.33% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 1.55% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 0.775% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 129reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 January 2024 to 9 March 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Journalists are ALREADY CALLING A VICTORY FOR NO/NO! WE WON! #VoteNoNo https://twitter.com/VoteNoVoteNo/status/1766407462561685857?t=XkUjxbm3gEifQ6TfWkGR2g&s=19
❤7🙏3👍1
🚨 Breaking: Bookmakers are signaling a tough road ahead for the government! Odds for No/No are on the RISE 📈: Result probabilities: • No/No = 60.0% • No/ = 63.6% • /No = 69.3% Is a political shake-up on the horizon? #VoteNoNoRef24 Source: BoyleSports
🔥5🙏2
No/No is now heavily favoured to win, according to the bookies 🇮🇪
🙏3
If anyone you know is unsure about these confusing amendments, explain the dangers of vague changes to our constitution. If in doubt, Vote No!
👏3
File, posted without a caption
🚨 Alarm bells are ringing across Ireland as key voices unite against tomorrow's referendums! This is the moment to stand for our rights. Tell everyone: tomorrow we make history. Say NO to stripping our freedoms away. Your vote is our voice. 🗣️💪 #VoteNoNo #VoteNoRef24 Follow @VoteNoVoteNo for more
❤5👍1
"THE NATIONAL WOMEN'S COUNCIL TELLING US (TO VOTE YES) [...] THEY DON'T KNOW WHAT A WOMAN IS!" Malachy Steenson addressed the crowd earlier today at the #VoteNoNo rally
👍9
Hundreds out to call for a #VoteNoNo turnout next Friday In opposition to the government trying to take away our rights!
👏5🔥3
Political interference on Tiktok: Tiktok has removed this video campaigning for a No result in the upcoming referendum on changing the definition of family in the constitution on the grounds that it violates their "hate" policies. The video shows a clip of Neale Richmond TD suggesting that the government understands that a Yes result will expand the scope of the family reunification scheme for migrants. Minister D…
👎2
"A foreseeable and avoidable mess." Cathal Loftus of the Christian Solidarity Party recently spoke about the dangerous situation that will result from a Yes vote on March 8th #VoteNoNo #VoteNoNo
👍8👏2
Vote No support doubles in 2 weeks! We are going to win! #VoteNoNo #KeepMnaInTheLaw #VotáilNílNíl
👍10🫡2
Awesome turnout today for the Dublin rally to Vote No on March 8th - more footage of the day to follow! @VoteNoVoteNo #VoteNoNo
👏11
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @VoteNoVoteNo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@VoteNoVoteNo named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Vote No No” (@VoteNoVoteNo), 40 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VoteNoVoteNo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.