Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Vote No No

@VoteNoVoteNo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

40subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002080314122
TypeChannel
Username@VoteNoVoteNo
DescriptionVote No to both amendments on March 8th #VoteNoNo linktr.ee/votenono
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 28 January 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/VoteNoVoteNo

Growth

407 August 2026 — 40 subscribers10 August 2026 — 40 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39–41 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 19:3140no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:3540first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 28 January 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
3
Videos
12
Links
5

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
8m 39s
Average length
43s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

129 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4837.2%
👏3325.6%
1914.7%
🔥96.98%
🙏86.20%
💯64.65%
👎32.33%
🫡21.55%
🤬10.775%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 129reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 January 2024 to 9 March 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Mar 2024, 10:20 UTC115 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Journalists are ALREADY CALLING A VICTORY FOR NO/NO! WE WON! #VoteNoNo https://twitter.com/VoteNoVoteNo/status/1766407462561685857?t=XkUjxbm3gEifQ6TfWkGR2g&s=19

7🙏3👍1

8 Mar 2024, 12:56 UTC107 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Breaking: Bookmakers are signaling a tough road ahead for the government! Odds for No/No are on the RISE 📈: Result probabilities: • No/No = 60.0% • No/ = 63.6% • /No = 69.3% Is a political shake-up on the horizon? #VoteNoNoRef24 Source: BoyleSports

🔥5🙏2

8 Mar 2024, 11:32 UTC88 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

No/No is now heavily favoured to win, according to the bookies 🇮🇪

🙏3

8 Mar 2024, 10:48 UTC82 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

If anyone you know is unsure about these confusing amendments, explain the dangers of vague changes to our constitution. If in doubt, Vote No!

👏3

7 Mar 2024, 16:07 UTC101 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

🚨 Alarm bells are ringing across Ireland as key voices unite against tomorrow's referendums! This is the moment to stand for our rights. Tell everyone: tomorrow we make history. Say NO to stripping our freedoms away. Your vote is our voice. 🗣️💪 #VoteNoNo #VoteNoRef24 Follow @VoteNoVoteNo for more

5👍1

3 Mar 2024, 18:06 UTC105 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

"THE NATIONAL WOMEN'S COUNCIL TELLING US (TO VOTE YES) [...] THEY DON'T KNOW WHAT A WOMAN IS!" Malachy Steenson addressed the crowd earlier today at the #VoteNoNo rally

👍9

3 Mar 2024, 14:31 UTC116 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Hundreds out to call for a #VoteNoNo turnout next Friday In opposition to the government trying to take away our rights!

👏5🔥3

3 Mar 2024, 13:49 UTC69 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @OrlaredChanPhoto

Political interference on Tiktok: Tiktok has removed this video campaigning for a No result in the upcoming referendum on changing the definition of family in the constitution on the grounds that it violates their "hate" policies. The video shows a clip of Neale Richmond TD suggesting that the government understands that a Yes result will expand the scope of the family reunification scheme for migrants. Minister D

👎2

27 Feb 2024, 15:54 UTC143 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

"A foreseeable and avoidable mess." Cathal Loftus of the Christian Solidarity Party recently spoke about the dangerous situation that will result from a Yes vote on March 8th #VoteNoNo #VoteNoNo

👍8👏2

5 Feb 2024, 12:25 UTC238 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Vote No support doubles in 2 weeks! We are going to win! #VoteNoNo #KeepMnaInTheLaw #VotáilNílNíl

👍10🫡2

3 Feb 2024, 21:10 UTC≈1,450 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Awesome turnout today for the Dublin rally to Vote No on March 8th - more footage of the day to follow! @VoteNoVoteNo #VoteNoNo

👏11

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @VoteNoVoteNo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Vote No No” (@VoteNoVoteNo), 40 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VoteNoVoteNo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.