Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

obsédé par le 淡梅

@Vorixvibe

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

166subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002556088621
TypeChannel
Username@Vorixvibe
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Vorixvibe

Growth

16216616412 Aug 2026, 23:17 — 162 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 23:30 — 162 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 00:28 — 166 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 23:1714 Aug 2026, 00:28
3 measurements spanning 1 day, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 161–167 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 00:28166+4
12 Aug 2026, 23:30162no change
12 Aug 2026, 23:17162first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 30 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
159.0%
avg views ÷ 166 subscribers
Avg views / post
264
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
10
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held17 (30 June 202612 August 2026)
Views total2,640
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 23:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 05s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 14:36 UTC17 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @verlnuPhoto

‌‌‌‌‌ ‌‌ ‌‌ 🤍🤍🤍🤍 ‌‌ ‌‌‌ ‌‌ ‌ ‌𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗐𝖺𝗋𝖽 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗀𝖾 ‌ ‌𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗇 𝖨'𝗅𝗅 𝗀𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝗒𝗈𝗎 𝖺 𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗋𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖿𝗋𝗈𝗆‌ 𝗀𝖺𝖼𝗁𝖺 ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ 🤍𝗀𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗌 ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝗌𝗁𝗂𝗉 𝗍𝗈𝗈 ‌ ‌𝖻𝖾 𝗃𝗈𝗂𝗇 🎀 ‌𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗍𝖾 🎀 𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗍 : ?? ‌‌ ‌‌ 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍

30 Jul 2026, 22:21 UTC157 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @AnswxrsPhoto

— ﹙ ✉️ ﹚ 𝖪𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗌 𝗂𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗍 𝖺 𝗐𝖾𝖺𝗄𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗌. 𝖳𝗁𝖾 𝗐𝗈𝗋𝗅𝖽 𝗆𝖺𝗒 𝗍𝗋𝗒 𝗍𝗈 𝗁𝖺𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗇 𝗒𝗈𝗎𝗋 𝗁𝖾𝖺𝗋𝗍, 𝖻𝗎𝗍 𝖽𝗈𝗇'𝗍 𝗅𝖾𝗍 𝗂𝗍 𝗍𝖺𝗄𝖾 𝖺𝗐𝖺𝗒 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍 𝗈𝖿 𝗒𝗈𝗎 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗆𝖺𝗄𝖾𝗌 𝗒𝗈𝗎 𝗐𝗁𝗈 𝗒𝗈𝗎 𝖺𝗋𝖾.

30 Jul 2026, 16:32 UTC147 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

𓂃 ࣪˖ ִֶָ𐀔 •. Я прожил всю свою жизнь с. надеждой однажды снова увидеть тебя, особенно когда мне было тяжелее всего.•

26 Jul 2026, 14:33 UTC≈1,290 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

𓂃 ࣪˖ ִֶָ𐀔‌‌‌ ‌ ‌🫧•~Answers privates

13 Jul 2026, 14:28 UTC357 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

"°你傷害我沒關係,但如果我傷害你,我會變成壞人嗎¿"

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Vorixvibe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,334,958 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“obsédé par le 淡梅” (@Vorixvibe), 166 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Vorixvibe.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.