4 measurements spanning 14 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 175–177 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Aug 2026, 08:46
176
-1
15 Aug 2026, 18:08
177
+2
8 Aug 2026, 14:02
175
no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:01
175
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 31 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
65 reactions across 9 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
21
32.3%
❤
19
29.2%
👍
8
12.3%
👏
6
9.23%
🙈
4
6.15%
🏆
3
4.62%
🕊
2
3.08%
🎉
1
1.54%
😇
1
1.54%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 31 October 2024 to 2 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ребята, привет!👋🏻
Сейчас нахожусь в поиске работы в сфере маркетплейсов (WB / Ozon).
Коротко обо мне:
— 3+ года в e-commerce
— запускал и вёл селлеров под ключ (от поиска товара до отгрузки)
— менеджерил бренды на Wildberries
— контролировал команды: закупка, фулфилмент, фотосессии
— организовывал съёмки, логистику и весь операционный процесс
— работал с поставщиками и закупками в Москве, Китае, Киргизии, Турции.
— …
Всем добрый день 🌞
Решил возобновить свою деятельность, емного забросил это дело из-за своих личных проблем, и оставил 4 постоянных клиента на долгое сотрудничество, сейчас я понимаю что дальше готов брать больше людей на ведение личного кабинета и помощь в продаже на вб, прикреплю вам скрины и отзывы о работе со мной, все отзывы не вмещаются, тк в основном все отзывы видео, по запросу могу выслать🤗
Всем хорошего д…
Всем добрый день 🌞
Сегодня подготовил новый канал🔥
Теперь работать, выкладывать ассортимент рынка, отзывы о работе со мной буду там, а всех присутствующих здесь прошу подписаться туда!)
Всем спасибо большое за внимание и с понедельника начинаем🤜
https://t.me/Bayyyer2026
Друзья, всем привет! 👋
Хотелось бы узнать ваше мнение! Я уже сказал, что в связи с некоторыми проблемами мы будем вынуждены сменить группу. Однако, мне интересно, как Вы относительно к этому?
Нужно ли нам менять группу или нет? Готовы ли Вы дальше идти с нами?
Ниже прикреплю опросник, где каждый сможет принять участие в судьбе канала!
Спасибо 🫂
Друзья, всем привет!
В первую очередь, я и моя команда, хотели бы поздравить всех Вас с наступившим Новым годом!
Желаем Вам здоровья, успехов и процветания во всех начинаниях 🫂🌲
Многие спрашивают, почему мало активности? Отвечаю:
друзья, я сейчас очень вовлечен в развитие иного направления в бизнесе, набираю новичков на индивидуальное обучение по WB, набрал 6 прекрасных ребят на наставничество… вообщем, дел много, …
Всем привет!
Выбор ниши, аналитика товара, оформления, документы, была сделана с помощью Владимира.
Мы подобрали востребованный товар и запустились.
Полная помощь по всем вопросам фф, фотосессий, аналитики, статистики и т.п
Не забыли также про внешний трафик-рекламу с блогерами, которую ожидаем на данный момент.
Владимир на связи 24/7. Любые вопросы, глупые не глупые, поможет, объяснит.
Глубокая аналитика внутр…
Как думаете сколько заработал новичок с вложениями 120 тысяч за 1,5 недели?
40.000 руб16%
70.000 руб34%
100.000 руб38%
14.000 руб16%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🔥5❤4🙈4👏1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @VolkovWB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как думаете сколько заработал новичок с вложениями 120 тысяч за 1,5 недели?
40.000 руб16%
70.000 руб34%
100.000 руб38%
14.000 руб16%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 31 October 2024 to 2 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 93,330 of 1,629,518 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@VolkovWB named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@uniqoleg named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Владимир Волков | Быстрый рост на WB” (@VolkovWB), 176 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VolkovWB.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
