Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Влада рулит

@Vlada_rules

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

53subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003510038552
TypeChannel
Username@Vlada_rules
DescriptionПродуктовый лидер в ИТ Рулю продуктами, командами и жизнью с характером Структурирую хаос Пишу про карьеру, решения, спорт и всё, чем рулю
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Vlada_rules

Growth

536 August 2026 — 53 subscribers10 August 2026 — 53 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 52–54 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 09:1653no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:0453first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
91.6%
avg views ÷ 53 subscribers
Avg views / post
48.6
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
21.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held8 (30 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total340
Reactions total72
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
33
Videos
6
Links
10

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
24s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

72 reactions across 7 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2534.7%
1622.2%
👍1013.9%
💯68.33%
custom 535757995349798388956.94%
🍾56.94%
custom 535742866756994820034.17%
custom 522668818374749923922.78%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC17 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

С пятницей🍷 #мемы

🍾51🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTC30 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

❤️ Часть 3. Рефлексия и выводы После моего грандиозного факапа и нежданной популярности я долго рефлексировала, что и где я сделала не так. Дорефлексировала до 3 выводов: 💡Первый. Дополнительные вопросы от коллег Даже если задача уже согласована и находится на финишной прямой, а коллега задает вопросы, и с явным акцентом на чем-то, нужно прислушаться, вдуматься, а еще лучше перепроверить, лишним не будет😄 💡Второй

2👍2🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC47 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

❤️Продолжаю серию постов про продуктовый опыт С этим факапом я выступала Product Fuckup Night: НП х Звук Эмоции и запись трансляции тут Часть 2. Факап На старте моей продуктовой карьеры я работала в крупной компании в направлении, отвечающем за доставку Обычный рабочий день: встречи, звонки, чаты, письма. Всё по классике Сижу на встрече, подходит рукль и говорит: -Псс, глянь почту Открываю письмо и вижу в копии ф

🔥5👍42

2 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC49 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

#мемы ❤️Отличного настроения

custom 53575799534979838895custom 53574286675699482003custom 52266881837474992392

31 Jul 2026, 14:17 UTC69 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

#мысливслух 🍿Вчера, по пути до митапа, мне несколько раз попадались билборды У меня эта фраза вызвала бурю эмоций, и я еще долго ощущала послевкусие какого то наеб легкого подтекста Каким именно предпринимателям нас призывают помочь? 💡Тем, чей товар сгорел на складах? Но их 💯 кикнули с витрины, им мы уже не поможем, разве что через благотворительность 💡Тем, чей товар остается на складах и торгуется? Они же продол

🔥6👍3💯3

31 Jul 2026, 09:12 UTC68 views21 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

❤️Вчера я впервые выступала на внешнем митапе Product Fuckup Night Перед выступлением сильно нервничала А перед самим рассказом, когда осознала, что сейчас пора брать слово мне, на мгновение потеряла дар речи 😱 Но благодаря команде, которая отлично модерировала мероприятие, круто разогрела публику и, кстати, меня Я быстро собралась и от души рассказала про свой факап В пике на митапе было: • 73 человека офлайн •

9🔥9💯3

30 Jul 2026, 20:14 UTC60 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥32👍1

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @Vlada_rules. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 201,775 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Влада рулит” (@Vlada_rules), 53 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Vlada_rules.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.