Channel
@Vivi67679
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
65subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003940832899 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Vivi67679 |
| Description | • Я нᥲчᥙнᥲющᥙᥔ κ᧐ᥴᥰ᧘ᥱᥱρ ᥙᤋ Կᥱδ᧐κᥴᥲρ!!! 明る ° ★☆ᨦ В϶ᥔ ദ ⊹𝆹𝅥 𝆹𝅥 ⁺ 𑄜𑄜ᯙ. Ан᧐н: ————— http://t.me/anonaskbot?start=iw2T7tyi8UYKmya Щᥰ κᥲнᥲ᧘: ———— https://t.me/+KxTrlI4ZKN42NTFi 𖥔 . ㅤ° ✦ ⁺ . ⊹ ˚ 𖥔 ㅤ֗ ˖ ✦ |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 13 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Vivi67679 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 65 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 65 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 64 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (13 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,377 |
| Reactions total | 201 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 02:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
254 reactions across 14 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5292060695548956485 | 54 | 21.3% | |
| custom 5467911109212151400 | 53 | 20.9% | |
| custom 5877553849975183844 | 40 | 15.7% | |
| custom 5879951322194647522 | 39 | 15.4% | |
| custom 5294178230389999396 | 28 | 11.0% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 4.72% | |
| custom 5877449714198124532 | 11 | 4.33% | |
| custom 5291914494862199142 | 6 | 2.36% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 1.57% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 1.57% | |
| 💋 | 2 | 0.787% | |
| custom 5877261178018733061 | 1 | 0.394% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 254reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
• Ⳡⲩⲧь ⲕⲟⲏⲧⲉⲏⲧⲁ, ⳡⲧⲟⳝы ⳝыⲗⲟ ʾ ་ ᵗ᷒ᰰ ͜ ㅤ ᩬׄ 𑇓 ⭐️⭐️⭐️ ۪ ᪈ ˑ ۪۪ ꒰ ᩧ Ⲡⲟⲕⲁ, ⲕ ⲥⲟⲯⲁⲗⲉⲏυю, ⲩ ⲙⲉⲏя ⲏⲉⲧ ⲁⲕⲕⲁⲩⲏⲧⲁ ⲃ ⲧυⲕ ⲧⲟⲕⲉ, ⲏⲟ я ⲟⳝяⳅⲁⲧⲉⲗьⲏⲟ ⲉⲅⲟ ⳅⲁⲃⲉⲇⲩ ⲡⲟⲡⲟⳅⲯⲉ 𐔌 𐦯 . 𞥊 ︩︪ ִᤳ 𝅄 🖤𝂅 𒄬 𓈒 ִ۫
custom 58774497141981245325custom 58775538499751838445custom 58799513221946475225custom 52920606955489564851custom 52941782303899993961
✨Ᏼᴄё-ᴛᴀᴋи чᴛᴏ-ᴛᴏ идёᴛ, ᴨᴏ϶ᴛᴏʍу ✨ я ϶ᴛᴏ ᴛᴀᴋжᴇ ᴏᴄᴛᴀʙᴧяю🖤 Иᴛᴏᴦи будуᴛ 10–15, ᴄʍᴏᴛᴩя ᴋᴀᴋ будᴇᴛ ᴄ ⭒ ׄ ָ дᴀᴧьнᴇйɯиʍ ᴀᴋᴛиʙᴏʍ˖ ׄ𝅄
custom 58799513221946475224❤2custom 54679111092121514002custom 52941782303899993961
Ꭰуʍᴀю, ᴇᴄᴧи нᴇ будᴇᴛ ᴀᴋᴛиʙᴀ, ᴛᴏ ничᴇᴦᴏ ᴄᴛᴩᴀɯнᴏᴦᴏ: ᴨᴩᴏᴄᴛᴏ удᴀᴧю, ᴀ ᴋᴀᴋ ᴨᴏдниʍу ᴀᴋᴛиʙ, ʙыᴄᴛᴀʙᴧю ɜᴀнᴏʙᴏ🖤🖤 Иᴧи жᴇ ᴨᴏᴛᴏʍ ᴨᴏʍᴇняю нᴀ чᴛᴏ-ᴛᴏ ᴨᴏинᴛᴇᴩᴇᴄнᴇй
custom 58775538499751838447❤2
꒰ ఎ. ˚ ₊ ✧ ・┈ · ┈ 🖤🖤 ┈ · ┈ ・ ✧ ° ₊ .໒ ꒱ А ʙᴏᴛ и ᴩᴏɜыᴦᴩыɯ, ᴋᴏᴛᴏᴩый я ᴏчᴇнь дᴀʙнᴏ нᴇ ᴨᴩᴏʙᴏдиᴧᴀ! Нᴀ ϶ᴛᴏᴛ ᴩᴀɜ ₊ ֹ ׅ 𝆬 ᄿ ᴨᴏбᴇдиᴛᴇᴧᴇй будᴇᴛ ᴛᴩᴏᴇ ݁੭ ࣪ ۪ ʾʾ ׅ⭒ ׄ ָ ⊹ 1 ⲙⲉⲥⲧⲟ — 100 ⳅⲃёⳅⲇ. 2 ⲙⲉⲥⲧⲟ — ⲡⲟⲇⲁⲣⲟⲕ ⲏⲁ 25 ⳅⲃёⳅⲇ. 3 ⲙⲉⲥⲧⲟ — ⲡⲟⲇⲁⲣⲟⲕ ⲏⲁ 15 ⳅⲃёⳅⲇ. ୨ৎ ᪶ ִ ˖ ᨳິ ˖ֵ ࣪. ☆᳢ Ⲡⲣⲁⲃυⲗⲁ ⲧⲉ ⲯⲉ ࣪. ☆᳢ 𝆬 ݂ ♡᳢ ֹ 𝆹𝅥𝆬 𝆭 ྀི • Ⳝыⲧь ⲡⲟⲇⲡυⲥⲁⲏⲏыⲙ ⲏⲁ ⲕⲁⲏⲁⲗ. • Ⲥⲇⲉⲗⲁⲧь ⲣⲉⲡⲟⲥⲧ ⲃ ⲕⲁⲏⲁⲗ υⲗυ ⲇⲣⲩⲅⲩ. • Ⲟⳝяⳅⲁⲧⲉⲗьⲏⲟ ⲥⲕυⲏⲩⲧь ⲥⲕⲣυⲏⲱⲟⲧ …
custom 529206069554895648511custom 54679111092121514006custom 52941782303899993965❤2
🪦ೀ܀ 🖤Ꮲᴇбяᴛᴋи, нᴇ ᴛᴇᴩяйᴛᴇ! ᨦ 🖤🖤 ᨩ ໒ ꒱ . 🎁 𝟤:𝟢𝟴 ⭐ . ⌢ ⋆·˚ ༘ * Я нᴇ ᴨᴩᴏᴨᴀᴧᴀ и ᴦᴏᴛᴏʙᴧюᴄь ᴋ ɸᴏᴋᴄᴀʍ ᴨᴏᴧныʍ хᴏдᴏʍ. Ꮶ ᴄᴏжᴀᴧᴇнию, ʙыᴄᴛуᴨᴀᴛь нᴇ буду, нᴏ я ʙᴄё жᴇ ʙ ᴨᴩᴏцᴇᴄᴄᴇ. Ꭲᴀᴋжᴇ ʙ ϶ᴛᴏʍ ʍᴇᴄяцᴇ хᴏчу ɜᴀᴋᴀɜᴀᴛь ᴋᴏᴄᴨᴧᴇйчиᴋ нᴀ ᴋᴏᴇ-ᴋᴏᴦᴏ, ᴛᴀᴋ чᴛᴏ ждиᴛᴇ ᴇᴦᴏ, ᴀ ᴛᴀᴋжᴇ ᴨᴏᴄᴛиᴋ ⟡ · ⊹ · ⟡ · ⊹ · ⟡ ‧₊˚* ( ?! ) 🎁 ₊₊ 따뜻한 🤩 𓂃 ࿐ …
custom 54679111092121514008custom 58775538499751838447custom 58799513221946475225custom 52920606955489564852
ׄ ⠀︧︨ं⠀ 𝄂֟፝𝄁꯭𝄂𝄅𝄁𝄂꯭ 🤩𖬺 ͜͝⠀⵿𓈒 ֹ ᰘ ࿙✧･ﾟ: 🤍*✧ 🤩᧐нᴛᥱнᴛᥲ нᥱᴛ, н᧐ ϶ᴛ᧐ ʙρᥱⲙᥱнн᧐, ᥰ᧐ᴛ᧐ⲙу чᴛ᧐ ᥰ᧐д κ᧐нᥱц ϶ᴛ᧐ᴦ᧐ ⲙᥱᥴяцᥲ ᥙ᧘ᥙ жᥱ ʙ нᥲчᥲ᧘ᥱ ᥴ᧘ᥱдующᥱᴦ᧐ 火̶ ᥊᧐чу ʙыᥴᴛᥲʙᥙᴛь κᥲκ᧐ᥔ-ᴛ᧐ ᥰ᧐ᥴᴛᥙκ, ུؗ ۪ 🎀 ᥲ ᥴ κᥱⲙ ᥙ ʙ κ᧐ⲙ — ᥴᥱκρᥱᴛ🍥 ᛝ🎀 𝆬 ࿚⃜ ࿙ྀི⃜࿚⃜࿙⃜ ࿙❀࿚⃜࿙ྀི⃜࿚⃜ ࿙⃜ ︶ ͝ ⠀ֵ ﴾𖢲 ׅ ꯨ⃜ ㅤׄ 🎀 И д᧘я ᥲκᴛᥙʙᥲ ᴛᥲκжᥱ д᧐δᥲʙ᧘ю ʙᥴяκᥙᥱ ᥙнᴛᥱρᥲκᴛᥙʙны, ᥰ᧐϶ᴛ᧐ⲙу ждᥙᴛᥱ, 💭 у ⲙᥱня ᥱщё ⲙн᧐ᴦ᧐ ᥰ᧘ᥲн᧐ʙ💭 ₊🤩 ᨳ꒰ ´ ˘ ꒱੭ 🤩zZz 🤩…
custom 52920606955489564856custom 54679111092121514005custom 58799513221946475225custom 52941782303899993963
. ోㅤׅ ꒰ 🍥 ᛝ 🍥 𝆬 ♡ ྀㅤ ᮫.💭 🤩✨🤍στ μ ɞμɠσϲμӄμ𖤐⭒๋࣭ ⭑🤩 🤩 𐍉 ɥγᴛκᥲ ᧘᧐᥊᧐ᴛϰꤎ ʙᥱɠƅ ϰ᧐ρⲙᥲ᧘ƅϰ᧐ ϰᥱ ᥴɠᥱ᧘ᥲ᧘ᥲ ᥴᥱᴛ᧐ɥκγ ᥴ ᥰᥲρᥙκ᧐ⲙ, ᥙ ᥰ᧐϶ᴛ᧐ⲙγ ʙ᧐᧘᧐ᥴƅɩ ᥴᤋᥲɠᥙ ᥱᥴᴛᥱᥴᴛʙᥱϰϰ᧐ ʙᥙɠϰᥱબᴛᥴꤎ, κᥲκ ᥙ ᥰ᧐ⲙ᧐ᴛᥲϰϰƅɩᥔ ᥰᥲρᥙκ ᥴ᧐δᥴᴛʙᥱϰϰ᧐. 𐋏γ ᥙ ᧘ᥲɠϰ᧐, ɥᴛ᧐ ᥱᥴᴛƅ ᴛ᧐ ᥱᥴᴛƅ. 𐌗᧐ᴛᥱ᧘᧐ᥴƅ δƅɩ ʙ δγɠγψᥱⲙ ᥱψё ρᥲᤋ ᥱᴦ᧐ ᥴɠᥱ᧘ᥲᴛƅ, ϰ᧐ γѫᥱ κργɥᥱ ʙⲙᥱᥴᴛᥱ ᥴ Ёᥴᥙκᥙ, ϶ᴛ᧐ ʙ᧐ᥰρ᧐ᥴ ʙρᥱⲙᥱϰᥙ ⌗ !…
custom 58775538499751838447custom 58799513221946475227custom 52920606955489564856🤝3
[zZ⁺z]⁺ᯏ. ‑ɞ϶ύ .ᯏ⁺ pinned a photo
𖤐⭒๋࣭ ⭑ 𐌿᧐ᥰ᧐ᤋжᥱ ʙыᥴᴛᥲʙ᧘ю ʙыд᧐ᥴᥙκᥙ
custom 58774497141981245326
🥰
custom 54679111092121514004custom 58775538499751838442
. ˚ ༘♡ ·˚꒰ 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 ꒱ ₊˚ˑ༄ . ݁ ݁ 🍥🍥 ݁⦙݂ 🕷🪡🕷🍉🪟🕷ㅤ⃨⇉ 🍥 ݁⦙݂ ⟡ ─┄─ ⟡ ᨦ 💢 ᨩ ⟡ ─┄─ ⟡ 𓈒 ִ۫ ┈꯭۫┈ «Ӷσɞσρꤎτ, ɞ τεϻϰστε ˚₊ · ⋆ . ηρꤎɥγτϲꤎ ϲτραχμ. Α ϻϰε ྀི ੈ ӄαѫετϲꤎ, ταϻ ηρσϲτσ ‧₊˚ ・: * ϲλμωӄσϻ ϻϰσӷσ ηραɞɠƅɩ.⥂⋅ ズの ° 🤍 ⊹ . 𑁯 ᰍ 🦴 ( !! ) . . *⋆ ˚🔤ᥱ δ᧐ᥔᥴя ᴛьⲙы – δ᧐ᥔᥴя˖ ݁𖥔 ݁˖ ˖ ݁𖥔 ݁˖ ᴛ᧐ᴦ᧐, κᴛ᧐ ʙ нᥱᥔ ˚⋆｡˚ ⋆* ˚ ༘ ᥰρячᥱᴛᥴя🤍⋆｡˚ . . *. 播 …
custom 546791110921215140015custom 529206069554895648512custom 58775538499751838448💋2🤝1custom 52919144948621991421custom 52941782303899993961custom 58772611780187330611
──ೋღ Ⲃⲥⲉ ⲃ ⲡⲣⲟцⲉⲥⲥⲉ ღೋ── 20 числа ⲡⲟⲥⲧυⲕ
custom 529206069554895648510custom 54679111092121514007custom 58799513221946475225custom 52919144948621991421custom 58775538499751838441
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @Vivi67679. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 316,397 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“[zZ⁺z]⁺ᯏ. ‑ɞ϶ύ .ᯏ⁺” (@Vivi67679), 65 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Vivi67679.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.