Один из крупных наших проектов — прошёл отбор в конкурсную программу Анимау!🤩 Так что как минимум знаете в каких образах можно будет поймать 21 человек в первый день фестиваля
custom 53370681302901254092

Channel
@VityushaMyr
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
114subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001682579483 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @VityushaMyr |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/VityushaMyr |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 114 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 114 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (19 June 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 444 |
| Reactions total | 37 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 18:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
97 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 51 | 52.6% | |
| custom 5337068130290125409 | 23 | 23.7% | |
| 💔 | 11 | 11.3% | |
| 🫡 | 6 | 6.19% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 4.12% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 2.06% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 97reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Один из крупных наших проектов — прошёл отбор в конкурсную программу Анимау!🤩 Так что как минимум знаете в каких образах можно будет поймать 21 человек в первый день фестиваля
custom 53370681302901254092
Ну что же...ожидайте на Анимау 🐱
❤7custom 53370681302901254094
Ля,прошел...прикол🖤 Чародейки прошли, хуеверс тоже. Время горящей жопы
❤3custom 53370681302901254092
Мне чисто уже жалко, что из-за этой заявки проблемной тратят столько времени на меня и самое обидное, что проблемы возникли уже после того, как ей присвоили статус :" на рассмотрении"..
❤3
Я упорно считаю, что вторая моя заявка- это проклятая заявка какая-то. У меня с другими не было никаких проблем, а вот с ней я уже в состоянии написать, что бы ее удалили уже....
❤3
мемы из разряда: " кто прислал мне смс? мой любимый чат анимау", продолжаются. Я ни с кем так часто не общалась, как на сайте Анимау с Изуру. Мем в том, что чисто диалог идет лишь по одной заявке из трех🚬. Ах,да. Я ещё и заболела , поэтому мое настроение на нуле, а завтра чертов понедельник и на работу
❤4
Этот дурачок я решил подать три заявки на Анимау и теперь сидит загнавшись,что не пройдёт с ними и боится ,что мой уровень может не дотянуть до проодки:
🫡6❤3
Пов,когда понял ,что нужно за месяц уложить 5 паричков, у которых краевые, некоторые нужно еще и стричь с нуля. Хочу быть как этот кот ...хочу чай и хомячить и учпочмаки
custom 53370681302901254095❤3
Сегодня у меня был первый опыт работы с трикотажем. Непередаваемые ощущения ,ребят. Надеюсь ,что за два дня следующих выходных доделаю костюм для группового дефиле 🖤
❤8
Сегодня был выпускной у моей младшей сестрёнки. Я в слезы. Просидела на церемонии час все снимая с букетом ее любимых роз и в нежной цветовой гамме упаковке,которую вчера выбирала минут 30 в цветочном . 🗼моя мелочь так выросла...я не могу ...а че так время быстро летит?
❤11
2 часа кропотливой работы🤌🏻
❤6🔥4🥰2
Пов,озвучили сроки дедлайна на анимау. Чисто как я вижу,когда наш орг пишет о том,что костюмы должны быть готовы к концу подачи и просит нас не проебаться:
custom 53370681302901254097
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @VityushaMyr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,029,005 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Китайская булка🐉Mark🌊” (@VityushaMyr), 114 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VityushaMyr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.