Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Vitamin D

Channel

Vitamin D

@VitaminDK2

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

134subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001692622847
TypeChannel
Username@VitaminDK2
Created12 January 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 October 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 8 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/VitaminDK2

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

131134132.57 August 2026 — 132 subscribers9 August 2026 — 132 subscribers23 August 2026 — 131 subscribers30 August 2026 — 133 subscribers14 September 2026 — 132 subscribers28 September 2026 — 134 subscribers7 August 202628 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 53 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 131–134 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Sept 2026, 21:16134+2
14 Sept 2026, 20:36132-1
30 Aug 2026, 23:37133+2
23 Aug 2026, 09:24131-1
9 Aug 2026, 00:31132no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:12132first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3h 14m
Average length
48m 43s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍375.0%
❤125.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 March 2024 to 28 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jun 2026, 05:11 UTC34 viewsread 9 August 2026

What I hadn’t noticed was how a subtle background fear had always accompanied that worldview — until it faded. As my understanding shifted, so did that fear. If health is something that emerges from everyday conditions — how we live, eat, move, rest, and relate — then I no longer need to see myself that way. Health becomes less frightening, less mysterious, and something that feels far more within my own hands. But …

28 Jun 2026, 05:11 UTC25 viewsread 9 August 2026

Without periods of biological inertness, viruses would violate core principles of metabolism, thermodynamics, and biological self-maintenance. As a result, the virus hypothesis requires viruses to be biologically active only when embedded within a host cell, and inert outside cells and between hosts. To a non-virology-trained mind though, this is profoundly counterintuitive: sure, many living systems can become dorm…

28 Jun 2026, 05:11 UTC23 viewsread 9 August 2026

But virologists claim that this is not a weakness. They claim that this is okay because when many different kinds of this inferred evidence are shown to point to the same conclusion, this counts as established evidence that a virus exists and causes disease. This is the main claim of virology. They claim convergence of inferred evidence is proof As I have said, I don’t have a scientific background, but something ab…

28 Jun 2026, 05:11 UTC20 viewsread 9 August 2026

I discovered that the fact that drugs produce predictable effects doesn’t necessarily mean they’re acting on a virus. These drugs interfere with basic processes inside our own cells — things like how genetic material is copied, how enzymes work, and how cells manage stress. Doesn’t drug “resistance” reflect viral evolution? I found out that what looks like “resistance” may simply reflect survivorship — cells that c…

28 Jun 2026, 05:11 UTC18 viewsread 9 August 2026

They also site poor nutrition and living conditions and point to the historical accounts that document the crude mass injection of several million people with experimental bacterial vaccines at the time. They question who the Spanish Flu virus narrative served at the time, and note that the Spanish Flu disappeared at the end of the war. When I looked beyond the usual narrative, rather than finding the virus evidence…

28 Jun 2026, 05:11 UTC17 viewsread 9 August 2026

The authors explain how improvements in living conditions, sanitation, nutrition, and the abandonment of harmful medical practices led to the decline of these diseases and how the medical profession has systematically misinterpreted and ignored key historical information. ‘Dissolving Illusions’ Suzanne Humphries MD and Roman Bystrianyk. So it seems clear from this graph alone that I was not going to be able to use …

28 Jun 2026, 05:11 UTC15 viewsread 9 August 2026

And isn’t mainstream medicine an advocate of terrain theory anyway? Isn’t ‘metabolic stress’ or ‘loss of equilibrium’ basically the same as the mainstream idea of ‘low immunity’? What I find interesting here is that where mainstream medicine says disease strikes the weak, terrain theory seems to be asking why people become weak, and as modern medicine increasingly focuses on stress, toxicity, nutrition, and resilienc…

28 Jun 2026, 05:11 UTC16 viewsread 9 August 2026

In a subsequent follow-up human challenge study published in 2026 by Jainyu Lai and other notable virologists and epidemiologists, it was reported that ‘no recipient developed influenza-like illness, PCR-positive respiratory samples, or serological evidence of infection following controlled exposure to infected donors.’ This theme is echoed throughout Daniel Roytas’ book ‘Can you catch a cold?’ (2024). He reveals th…

28 Jun 2026, 05:11 UTC16 viewsread 9 August 2026

I knew that Pox viruses were said to be blood borne, and I knew that it was possible to capture images of small structures in the blood because I had seen images of them. The microscope technique used here is called light microscopy which is a much more direct process than electron microscopy. I found out that all sorts of structures inside cells in the blood such as mitochondria, and granules are directly visible t…

28 Jun 2026, 05:11 UTC17 viewsread 9 August 2026

What this suggests is that the most important technique for “confirming the cytotoxic effect of viruses” has been carried out without controls since the first time it was reported on in the 1950s, (when it turns out a Nobel Prize was awarded). 4. Ok, regardless of whether we can confirm the effects of viruses, I’m sure I’ve seen actual images of them? I initially looked into the technique regarded as the most advan…

28 Jun 2026, 05:11 UTC22 viewsread 9 August 2026

"I thought it would be really easy to find evidence for the existence of viruses. Here’s my trail of questions and findings... I set up a community farm called Lovebrook here in Sussex in the UK. On Fridays I lead a community health session. I’m not medically trained but that doesn’t matter. The idea is that we tap into the deep pool of health knowledge and experience that the community already has. We share what we…

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @VitaminDK2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Vitamin D” (@VitaminDK2), 134 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VitaminDK2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.