3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 660–662 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 14:35
660
-2
6 Aug 2026, 17:18
662
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:34
662
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
100 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👎
33
33.0%
👏
31
31.0%
❤
18
18.0%
👍
11
11.0%
🕊
3
3.00%
🙏
3
3.00%
🤝
1
1.00%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 100reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 January 2026 to 21 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
➖➖➖➖➖➖
🖊قابل توجه هنرمندان گرامی
با سلام و احترام
با توجه به محدودیتها و قطعیهای مکرر تلگرام، برای نظمبخشی بهتر به اطلاعرسانیها و هماهنگیهای کاری، «گروه بله انجمن» که به عنوان مرجع رسمی و مورد تأیید اداره کل فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی مرکزی فعالیت میکند، به عنوان بستر اصلی ارتباط و انتشار اطلاعیهها حوزه هنرهای تجسمی در نظر گرفته شده است. (گروه حاضر بزودی تغییر نام خواهد یافت)
لطفاً برای دریافت اخبار و هماهنگیهای …
*🔺فراخوان چاپ اثر هنرمندان در کتاب هنرهای تجسمی «هنرِ ایرانِ معاصر»*
محفل هنری راجا با همکاری مؤسسه چندمنظوره فرهنگی و هنری «خط و خاک» (معاونت علمی، فناوری و اقتصاد دانشبنیان ریاستجمهوری) و مشارکت انتشارات نوآوران دانش برگزار میکند.
🔻مشخصات کتاب:
➖قطع خشتی
➖ ۲۰/۵ در ۲۰/۵ سانتیمتر
➖کاغذ داخل کتاب 150 گرمی گلاسه
➖جلد مقوای 300 گرمی
➖صحافی چسب گرم
▫️کیوریتور: فرزاد جمشیددانایی
▫️با مشاوره عالی هنری صمد کاویانی
…
از آنجا که بسیاری از دوستان خواستار بازنشر مطلبی بودند که پیشتر از کانال انجمن حذف شده بود، به احترام این درخواست، آن را یک بار دیگر منتشر میکنم؛ به این امید که این بار مجال بیشتری برای دیده شدن داشته باشد و سرنوشت انتشارش بار دیگر به حذف ختم نشود.👇👇👇
✍️جواد شادروان
ما ز یاران چشم یاری داشتیم
خود غلط بود آنچه میپنداشتیم
این بیت، بهترین توصیف حال و روز بسیاری از هنرمندان این شهر است؛ هنرمندانی که روزی با امید و اعتماد، چشم به مدیری دوختند که نه تنها خود را برخاسته از همین خاک و دیار میدانست، بلکه با عنوان دکترای تئاتر و سابقه حضور در عرصه هنر، نویدبخش روزهای روشنتری برای فرهنگ و هنر استان بود.
انتظار میرفت مدیری که زبان هنر را میشناسد، درد هنرمند را بهتر از د…
پاسخی به حذف یک نقد
دوستان و همکاران و هنرمندان گرامی
متأسفانه مطلب انتقادی اینجانب که با هدف بیان دغدغههای بخشی از جامعه هنری و در چارچوب احترام منتشر شده بود، از کانال انجمن حذف گردید.
آنچه موجب تأسف بیشتر است، نه حذف یک نوشته، بلکه حذف فرصت گفتوگو و شنیدن صدایی متفاوت است. انجمنهای هنری اساساً برای گردهم آمدن دیدگاههای مختلف شکل گرفتهاند، نه برای بازتاب یکصدایی و تأیید بیچونوچرای مدیران و مسئولان.
نقد، اگر…
هجدهمین جشنواره هنرهای تجسمی فجر در استان مرکزی در فرهنگسرای آیینه اراک به ایستگاه آخر رسید
#اداره کل_فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی_استان مرکزی
#تجسم_فجر
#ایران_همدل
#ایران_قوی
📲 با اداره کل فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی استان مرکزی همراه باشید:
🆔 @F_H_R_markazi
بازدید هنرجویان هنرستان شهیدآوینی اراک از تولیدات هنرمندان در هجدهمین جشنواره هنرهای تجسمی فجر
#اداره کل_فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی _استان مرکزی
#هنر_تجسم_فجر
#ایران_همدل
#ایران_قوی
آیین افتتاحیه هجدهمین جشنواره تجسمی فجر در استان مرکزی در فرهنگسرای آیینه اراک برگزار شد
#اداره کل_فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی _استان مرکزی
#فرهنگ _هنر_رسانه
#تجسم_فجر
#ایران_همدل
#ایران_قوی
به اطلاع می رساند برای کسانی که شرکت می کنند گواهی حضور معتبر صادر می شود .
🙏2❤1
Signed Ali Amiri
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Visualmarkazi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 409,619 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Visualmarkazi named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@f_h_r_markazi named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“موسسه انجمن هنرهای تجسمی استان مرکزی” (@Visualmarkazi), 660 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Visualmarkazi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
