Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Простая Visiology

@VisiologySimple

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

360subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002517184704
TypeChannel
Username@VisiologySimple
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/VisiologySimple

Growth

360361360.57 Aug 2026, 15:48 — 361 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 06:33 — 361 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 09:48 — 360 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 15:488 Aug 2026, 09:48
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 360–361 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 09:48360-1
8 Aug 2026, 06:33361no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:48361first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 19 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

414 reactions across 19 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13031.4%
🔥8019.3%
👍7618.4%
💯317.49%
🤗276.52%
❤‍🔥163.86%
🕊163.86%
custom 541793147673170087540.966%
🏆40.966%
😁40.966%
custom 525136913600453946830.725%
🍾30.725%
👏30.725%
custom 533473841547471504420.483%
custom 533710990314203741420.483%
👎20.483%
😍20.483%
🤝20.483%
🤡20.483%
custom 533460354920665382910.242%
4 further kinds40.966%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 414reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 September 2025 to 7 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Jun 2026, 09:32 UTC318 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

По просьбам трудящихся 😊 Создал сообщество Visiology в МАКС. Пока это неофициальная площадка для пользователей. Здесь можно задавать вопросы, делиться опытом, обсуждать лучшие практики и помогать друг другу в решении задач. Если сообщество будет активно развиваться, предложим Visiology там официальное представительство. Отдельно хочу сказать про канал «Простая Visiology». Сейчас я работаю с другой BI-платформой -

👍4👎2🤡2

22 Dec 2025, 06:02 UTC829 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🥱 “𝐁𝐈 — 𝐞𝐭𝐨 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐨 𝐝𝐫𝐚𝐠 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐝𝐫𝐨𝐩.” Когда-то я тоже услышал эту фразу. И частично она верна: интерфейс Visiology действительно интуитивный. Но это только поверхность. Настоящая работа начинается там, где «drag and drop» заканчивается: 📌 Моделирование данных — понимание связей и логики, без которого отчёт просто не работает. 📌 DAX — мощные выражения для расчётов, метрик и гибких KPI. 📌 Self-Service ETL — подготовка,

💯17👍10🏆4

1 Dec 2025, 10:12 UTC899 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🧜🏿‍♀️ Кастомный tooltip Вот как сделать многосерийные тултипы в Highcharts и ECharts библиотеках: Highcharts // Включаем общий тултип для всех серий w.tooltip.shared = true w.tooltip.shadow = true // Кастомный форматтер w.tooltip.formatter = function () { // Заголовок — категория по оси X let tooltip = `<strong>${this.x}</strong><br/>`; // Проходим по всем точкам под курсором this.points.forEach(i

🔥125❤‍🔥1🤔1custom 53346035492066538291

Signed Мария Денищук

25 Nov 2025, 06:04 UTC747 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🧛🏻‍♀️ Редактор DAX абсолютно не соответствует тому, что мы пытаемся в нём делать. Вы строили дашборды, подключали источники данных, впечатляли заказчиков своими навыками BI. А потом пытались решить сложное вычисление — и вдруг оказывались, щурясь на код DAX в окошке, которое выглядит как текстовый редактор из Windows 95. Вы вынуждены писать функциональный язык (сам по себе сложный для большинства), который опирает

💯13🔥3👏2😁1

24 Nov 2025, 07:35 UTC965 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🐾 Если случайно нажали что-то и у вас выделилось всё содержимое — просто щёлкните в поле, отмеченное на картинке

👍155😁3🔥2custom 53347384154747150442custom 52513691360045394681

19 Nov 2025, 10:02 UTC787 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🫨 Если у вас накопилось много наработок на Highcharts, не пугайтесь — их можно продолжать использовать. Неофициальный способ: Если у вас уже есть, например, столбчатая диаграмма, созданная на версии 3.13 и ранее, то при копировании этого виджета он всегда будет оставаться столбчатой диаграммой на Highcharts. Это позволяет продолжать использовать свои старые наработки. Причем в рамках одного дашборда могут использова

🔥9❤‍🔥5👍42

14 Nov 2025, 16:20 UTC763 views44 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

27🤗8🕊6😍2❤‍🔥1

14 Nov 2025, 16:20 UTC736 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

23🤗10🕊6❤‍🔥1

14 Nov 2025, 16:19 UTC707 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

21🤗9🕊4❤‍🔥1

14 Nov 2025, 07:35 UTC660 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Данные: 1) ID - идентификатор задачи 2) Родитель - ID родительской задачи 3) Название задачи 4) Дата начала 5) Дата окончания 6) Зависимость - ID задачи, от которой зависит текущая 7) Тип задачи 8) Прогресс - процент выполнения от 0 до 1

🔥53🤝2

14 Nov 2025, 07:33 UTC662 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Как сделать Ганта с подзадачами и связями? - прозвучал вопрос вчера в зале. С таким промтом получается отличный рабочий виджет. Алиса и DeepSeek справились на ура! Попробуйте сами: Нужно сделать диаграмму Ганта через библиотеку Apex Gantt. Требования: - Цветовое кодирование задач по типам (у каждого типа — свой цвет). Данные: - Измерения: ID задачи, ID родительской задачи, название, даты начала/окончания, зависимо

🔥10👍64

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @VisiologySimple. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Простая Visiology” (@VisiologySimple), 360 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VisiologySimple.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.