Channel
@VirusMania_LG
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
721subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001794019579 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @VirusMania_LG |
| Description | Canale d'informazione scientifica curato da Luigi Gallo |
| Created | Between 1 January 2022 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/VirusMania_LG |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:06 | 721 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 721 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
506 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 254 | 50.2% | |
| 👍 | 154 | 30.4% | |
| 👏 | 58 | 11.5% | |
| 🤣 | 14 | 2.77% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 2.57% | |
| 🥱 | 5 | 0.988% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 0.791% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.198% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.198% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 0.198% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 0.198% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 506reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 December 2024 to 13 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
F(H)ANTAVIRUS, la storia si ripete? – I 1) Ci si basa su sintomi aspecifici (potrebbero essere di un’influenza o altro); 2) si afferma che si tratta di un “virus” escludendo qualsiasi altra possibile causa; 3) si paventa la diffusione tra le persone senza reali evidenze ma con i soliti test di dubbia affidabilità; 4) si alimenta il terrore perché non esistono trattamenti o cure efficaci fino a quando non giungerà il …
❤20👍13🥱1🙏1
INVENTORI DI MALATTIE - I Tra la iatrogenesi, di cui abbiamo ampiamente discusso soprattutto in relazione al Covid [*], e quello che viene definito disease mongering, ovvero la mercificazione della malattia, vi è potenzialmente una connessione, seppur poco esplorata. Il disease mongering crea nuovi malati ampliando o inventando categorie diagnostiche; la iatrogenesi riguarda i danni causati dagli interventi sanitar…
👍19❤4👏1💯1🔥1
"La medicina degli schiavi non si preoccupa della causa della malattia, né dialoga con il malato: cura in modo autoritario, come un padrone che impartisce ordini. La medicina degli uomini liberi, invece, dialoga con il paziente, indaga l’origine del male e cura facendo uso della conoscenza." Platone (Leggi, IV, 720a–c) ----------------------------- Segui VirusMania -----------------------------
❤22👏7👍3💯2
LA FALSA SCIENZA - Intervista a Stefano Scoglio VII In questo stralcio ripreso da un’intervista [*] rilasciata a Livio Sgarbi il 12 gennaio 2021, Stefano Scoglio spiega, in modo chiaro e comprensibile a tutti, gli aspetti critici, in ambito microbiologico, della ricerca sui virus. Secondo Scoglio la cosiddetta "virologia" non può qualificarsi come scienza in quanto a tutt’oggi nessun virus è mai stato realmente isola…
❤22👏7👍3🥱1
I VIRUS, ESISTONO DAVVERO? Quella dell’esistenza dei virus, e di conseguenza della loro presunta patogenicità, potrebbe essere considerata un’ipotesi aperta, da sottoporre a verifica sperimentale condivisa, per risolvere finalmente e in modo scientificamente corretto la questione. Questa fu qualche anno fa la proposta di un gruppo di scienziati internazionali di cui riporto il documento tradotto in italiano. Essi sug…
❤19👏9🤣2
VACCINAZIONI PEDIATRICHE – Confronti III Questo studio del 2017 [*] pubblicato sulla rivista EBioMedicine riporta i risultati di un’indagine svolta, in collaborazione tra Guinea Bissau e due Istituti di ricerca danesi, su 1057 bambini di un'area cittadina. La ricerca ha stabilito che tra i neonati inoculati con la prima dose di Difterite-Tetano-Pertosse mediamente a quattro mesi d'età, la mortalità quintuplicava risp…
👏7👍5❤1🔥1🤡1🤣1
LA FALSA SCIENZA - Intervista a Stefano Scoglio VI In questa intervista [*] del 3 marzo 2022 Stefano Scoglio ribadisce i concetti chiave della sua critica alla narrativa pandemica e a quella pseudoscientifica chiarendo, tra l’altro, argomenti come l’inaffidabilità dei tamponi molecolari e la non specificità dei test anticorpali, la mancanza di prove sull’isolamento dei virus e sull’esistenza della famigerata proteina…
❤22👏8🔥5🤣2🤗1
VACCINAZIONE INUTILE E PERICOLOSA (A. R. Wallace) Alfred Russel Wallace, eminente naturalista e scienziato inglese, in questa ricerca del 1889, che suscitò all’epoca molto scalpore nel Regno Unito, confrontò individui vaccinati e non vaccinati contro il vaiolo in un arco temporale di 45 anni. Egli concluse che i dati non supportavano l’efficacia della vaccinazione e che malattia e mortalità aumentavano in misura alla…
👍19👏5❤3🤣2
VACCINO COVID E TUMORI Un recente studio coreano, pubblicato su Biomarker Research, ha analizzato i dati nazionali relativi ai casi di cancro confrontando, a un anno di distanza dall’inoculazione, i non vaccinati, i vaccinati con ciclo iniziale e i vaccinati con richiami. Sono stati rilevati aumenti significativi di almeno sette tipi di tumore: tiroide, stomaco, colon-retto, polmone, pancreas, seno e prostata. I dat…
👍11❤4🤣2
----------------------------- Segui VirusMania -----------------------------
❤25👍5👏3
LA FALSA SCIENZA - Intervista a Stefano Scoglio V In questa intervista [*] rilasciata a ByoBlu nell’autunno del 2021 il dr. Scoglio provava e documentava attraverso uno studio, precedentemente promosso ma poi secretato dal governo giapponese, la sua tesi sulla sostanziale inefficacia del siero genico sperimentale proposto come antidoto alla sindrome influenzale etichettata come “covid-19” e, al contempo, della sua el…
❤20👍6🔥2🤣1
VIRUS O ESOSOMI? – II Facendo seguito al precedente post sull’argomento, segnalo questo interessante aggiornamento di Mauro Sartorio, umanista e divulgatore scientifico, che propone un’ampia disamina dei progressi negli studi sugli esosomi e approfondisce l’ipotesi della loro sostanziale identità con quelli che oltre un secolo fa vennero definiti virus. Oggi gli esosomi stanno attirando l’attenzione dei ricercatori p…
👍7❤2🤣1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @VirusMania_LG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 438,936 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“VIRUSMANIA” (@VirusMania_LG), 721 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VirusMania_LG.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.