Sticker, posted without a caption

Channel
•مَجَلهی کریستالِ سُرخ•
@Viosalindaily
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
808subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001558123010 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Viosalindaily |
| Created | 9 August 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Viosalindaily |
Topic
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 00:00 | 808 | -2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 20:58 | 810 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:12 | 811 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:19 | 814 | +6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 808 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:02 | 808 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
221 reactions across 16 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤝 | 134 | 60.6% | |
| 💘 | 87 | 39.4% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 221 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
روزهایی که تصمیم میگیرم خب دیگه بسه، نباید از خودم بد حرف بزنم! وقتشه یکم برای خودم ارزش قائل بشم میشینم از بقیه بد حرف میزنم.
💘18🤝5
خیلی خوشحالم یکی از منظور حرفهامو میفهمه چون هر لحظه منتظر بودم یکی بگه "وای تو نمیخواد غصه پسر هارو بخوری" درحالی که دختر! خودت عملا داری با این کارها و حرفها به اینکه هر ویژگی مربوط به زن ویژگی بد و ضعیف محسوب میشه حکم تایید میزنی.
💘13🤝8
پرنسسعلی گفتن به پسرا برای تحقیر استفاده میشه و این شکی نیست خب حالا چرا تحقیر؟ چون یک پسر، یک مَرد! از ویژگیهای جنس دوم و ضعیف زنونه برای رفتارهاش استفاده کرده 😱
🤝15💘2
دقیقااا وای بالاخره یک حرف درست
💘9
https://t.me/Viosalindaily/25729 بعد تازه این ایدهی پشتش خودش کاملا زن ستیزانهست لایک اگه ویژگی ویژگیه بدیه چرا میگین دخترونهست و اگه ویژگی بدی نیست چرا مرد نباید داشته باشه؟
💘9
درکل که آره Feminine Energy و Masculine Energy وجود داره ولی تروخدا کلا سمت این چیزا نرین.
🤝10
یا همین موضوع برای دخترا. مثلا میگن وای امروز برخلاف انرژی زنانم، در کولر رو درست کردم. خب فداتشم این تفکر که شد همون تفکرِ "زن مثل برگ گل لطیفه" از حدیثهای امام سجاد که.
🤝12💘1
دقیقاا؟ مثلا پسره سر یک موضوع قهر میکنه و سریع طرف میگه وای از مردهای پرنسسعلی متنفرم. خب عزیزدلم قهر اصلا حرکت خوبی برای مشکلات نیست و این درست ولی این چه راهحلی هست دیگه؟ الان این حرفهات هیچ فرقی نداره که قرن قاجار میگفتن مرد باید مَرررردددد باشه.
🤝12
وای کاااملا موافق. با انرژی زنانه و دخترونه باش و فلان انگار دارن شرم میدن به دخترایی که کارای به اصطلاح پسرونه و فنی بلدن، از حقشون با صدای بلند دفاع میکنن، یا کلا باجربزهن و از پس خودشون برمیان. با پرنسسعلی گفتنم دارن احساس امنیت رو از مردها میگیرن درحالیکه مردای فمینین کیوتتر و آدمترن خیلی اوقات 😂
💘8🤝4
درکل خلاصه حرف من اینه که انرژی زنانه و مردانه و کوفت. انرژی که من میتونم درحال حاضر بدم بدبختی، بیچارگی، بیپولی، غم و غصه و قسطه.
🤝16💘3
نمیدونم بهم میخواین حمله کنید یا هرچی ولی همین بحث وای پرنسسعلی شدن پسرا، چقدر پسرا انرژی زنانه دارن و بحثهای مشابه باعث شده پسرها از ساید فمنیم خودشون دوری کنن درحالی که قهر کردن، بروز دادن احساساتی مثل غم و ناراحتی، درخواست محبت عاطفی کردن با کلام و چیزهای مشابه رفتار و خواستههای هر انسان عادیه یجورایی همین کلمهی پیکمی که باعث شد خیلی از دخترا رفتار خودشونو کنترل کنن و در مقابل کراششون رفتارهاشونو تغییر بد…
🤝24💘5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Viosalindaily. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@rangirangimag · 24,413
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 16 September 2026
@phenomenalikeme · 23,625
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 17 September 2026
@vernte · 27,981
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 14 September 2026
@RahmaniRamin · 27,699
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 September 2026
@Classical_and_Instrumental_Music · 24,650
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 15 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“•مَجَلهی کریستالِ سُرخ•” (@Viosalindaily), 808 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Viosalindaily.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.