Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Russian Mission Vienna

@ViennaMissionRu

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,513subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001592391298
TypeChannel
Username@ViennaMissionRu
Created28 February 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ViennaMissionRu

Growth

1,5111,5131,5126 August 2026 — 1,512 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,512 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,511 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,513 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,511–1,513 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 02:321,513+2
9 Aug 2026, 11:331,511-1
6 Aug 2026, 18:301,512no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:051,512first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.0%
avg views ÷ 1,513 subscribers
Avg views / post
182
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held22 (15 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total3,643
Reactions total32
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 18:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

27 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
725.9%
👍725.9%
💯622.2%
😁311.1%
🙏27.41%
🤔27.41%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC29 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ulyanov_mikhail

Лидеры Пакистана, Саудовской Аравии и Турции подписали в Мекке трехстороннее оборонительное соглашение, в соответствии с которым нападение на одну из этих стран будет рассматриваться как на падение на всех трех. Таким образом на наших глазах формируются элементы новой архитектуры безопасности в большом азиатском регионе. К сожалению, до сих пор отсутствует система коллективной безопасности в Персидском заливе с учас

🤔1

6 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTC81 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ulyanov_mikhail

Президент Трамп пригрозил «обезглавить» Иран, если тот не воспользуется «последним шансом» на достижение сделки. Что-то риторика в международных делах стала зачастую напоминать триллер, если не фильм ужасов.

💯4

4 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC154 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @znppofficialPhoto

Памяти Александра Александровича Яковлева Президент России Владимир Путин наградил орденом Мужества посмертно главного инженера Запорожской АЭС Александра Александровича Яковлева. Для коллектива станции эта награда - признание мужества, профессионализма и самоотверженности человека, который до последнего дня выполнял свой долг, обеспечивая безопасность ЗАЭС. С 2022 года Александр Александрович возглавлял инженерну

3🤔1🙏1

30 Jul 2026, 20:05 UTC212 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @MFARussiaPhoto

🎙Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova's statement on the Ukrainian attack on the Zaporozhskaya Nuclear Power Plant (July 30, 2026) 💬 On July 30, the Kiev regime attempted to strike a site within the perimeter of the Zaporozhskaya Nuclear Power Plant (#ZNPP). The target was the dry spent nuclear fuel storage facility, specifically the building housing a transporter used to move spent nuclear fuel con

30 Jul 2026, 20:05 UTC108 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @MID_RussiaPhoto

🎙 Комментарий официального представителя МИД России М.В.Захаровой в связи с ударом ВСУ по территории Запорожской АЭС (30 июля 2026 года) 💬 30 июля киевский режим предпринял попытку нанесения удара в пределах периметра Запорожской АЭС (#ЗАЭС). Целью стала площадка сухого хранилища отработавшего ядерного топлива, в частности, здание для размещения транспортера, предназначенного для перевозки контейнеров с отработавши

😁2👍1

30 Jul 2026, 20:04 UTC112 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @MFARussiaPhoto

☢️ Zaporozhskaya Nuclear Power Plant: On July 30, an attack on critical infrastructure at the Zaporozhskaya Nuclear Power Plant (#ZNPP) has been thwarted. Today, a Ukrainian UAV attack was detected on the premises of the ZNPP, operated by Rosatom, near the dry spent nuclear fuel storage facility. The drone was discovered in close proximity to the building housing a transporter used to move spent nuclear fuel conta

30 Jul 2026, 20:04 UTC103 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @znppofficialPhoto

На Запорожской АЭС предотвращена атака на критически важную инфраструктуру Сегодня на территории Запорожской АЭС, входящей в Росатом, в районе площадки СХОЯТ (сухого хранилища отработавшего ядерного топлива) была зафиксирована атака беспилотного летательного аппарата ВСУ с боевым зарядом. Дрон был обнаружен в непосредственной близости от здания хранения транспортера, предназначенного для перевозки контейнеров с отр

👍1😁1

26 Jul 2026, 11:22 UTC224 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇷🇺 We are publishing the IAEA Information Circular, circulated to Member States for their information on 🗓️ 23 July 2026 Communication from the Permanent Mission of the Russian Federation to the International Organizations in Vienna

26 Jul 2026, 11:21 UTC242 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇷🇺 Публикуем распространенный для сведения государств-членов информационный циркуляр МАГАТЭ от 🗓️ 23 июля 2026 г. Материал Постоянного представительства Российской Федерации при международных организациях в Вене

👍1

25 Jul 2026, 13:50 UTC197 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @StranaRosatomPhoto

Погибших сотрудников Запорожской АЭС представят к государственным наградам Об этом решении рассказал глава Росатома Алексей Лихачев. По его словам, по городу и станции все так же наносятся удары — по рынку, магазинам и жилым домам. После последних атак в городе три женщины ранены, один мужчина погиб. «На прошлой неделе мы потеряли несколько наших работников. В первую очередь хочется сказать об Александре Александро

🙏1

23 Jul 2026, 20:42 UTC196 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇷🇺 We are publishing the IAEA Information Circular, circulated to Member States for their information in connection with unprecedented terrorist attack at Zaporozhskaya NPP Statement by Federal Environmental, Industrial and Nuclear Supervision Service

2

23 Jul 2026, 20:33 UTC197 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇷🇺 Публикуем распространенный для сведения государств-членов информационный циркуляр МАГАТЭ в связи с беспрецедентным террористическим актом на Запорожской АЭС Заявление Федеральной службы по экологическому, технологическому и атомному надзору

👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @ViennaMissionRu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 549,257 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Russian Mission Vienna” (@ViennaMissionRu), 1,513 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ViennaMissionRu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.