Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫 𝐒𝐭𝐨𝐧𝐞 (𝐝𝐞𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐲 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐚 𝐜𝐲𝐛𝐨𝐫𝐠)

@VictorStoneEOT

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

29subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003761481213
TypeChannel
Username@VictorStoneEOT
DescriptionЕсли тебе, приятель, кажется, что ты какой-то не такой или сломанный – мы все тут чинимся на ходу. — Анонимная связь: https://t.me/VictorStonesmailbox_bot — Канал по мотивам сети телеграм-каналов: https://t.me/echoesoftomorrow
Created26 February 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/VictorStoneEOT

Growth

2910 Aug 2026, 13:00 — 29 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 05:46 — 29 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 13:0011 Aug 2026, 05:46
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28–30 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 05:4629no change
10 Aug 2026, 13:0029first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 26 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
4
Links
5

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

107 reactions across 8 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2422.4%
2119.6%
❤‍🔥1110.3%
🌭109.35%
👏87.48%
💋65.61%
🦄65.61%
🍓54.67%
🥰32.80%
21.87%
🏆21.87%
👻21.87%
💯21.87%
🕊21.87%
🍌10.935%
👍10.935%
😢10.935%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 107reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 26 February 2026 to 14 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Apr 2026, 17:25 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫 𝐒𝐭𝐨𝐧𝐞 (𝐝𝐞𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐲 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐚 𝐜𝐲𝐛𝐨𝐫𝐠)»

14 Apr 2026, 17:25 UTC32 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @echoesoftomorrowPhoto

💋💋 Представляете, Виктор Стоун наконец выходит с отпуска!❤️ Видимо, он уже хорошенько восстановил свои силы.🎁 ᅠᅠ 🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️ 😻💋💋😻 💋 Тем более как же титанам без него. 💋 #возвращение 💋 @echoesoftomorrow

1 Apr 2026, 11:49 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «[ Рест ] 𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫 𝐒𝐭𝐨𝐧𝐞 (𝐝𝐞𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐲 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐚 𝐜𝐲𝐛𝐨𝐫𝐠)»

1 Apr 2026, 11:47 UTC45 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @echoesoftomorrowPhoto

💋💋 Даже Виктор Стоун, несмотря на свои невероятные навыки и неиссякаемый дух, нуждается в отдыхе.🎩 😻 Бесконечные разборки, чужая тупость и безысходность происходящего вымотали его до состояния, когда уже всё равно.🥃Эта неделя, полная дурацких провалов и идиотских ошибок, стала настоящим испытанием даже для его железных нервов. 💋 ᅠᅠ 🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️ 😻💋💋😻 💋 Просим не беспокоить саппорта с 1 по 14 апреля.🎁 #рест 💋 @ech

28 Mar 2026, 17:36 UTC54 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026

⠀ К слову, я увидел, что мне на почту пришли вопросы. И снова довольно много. Думаю, что в ближайшее время отвечу на некоторые из них, потому что они... Ну, приятель, я ещё в прошлый раз выразил о них своё мнение. ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ ⚙️ #monologue ⚙️

❤‍🔥2🌭2🔥21

28 Mar 2026, 17:29 UTC57 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026

⠀ 🌧️ Я никогда не хотел быть говорящим конструктором, я просто хотел быть человеком. Конечно, я вспоминаю запах газона после игры, крики трибун, – знакомые и не очень, – то чувство, когда тебе повезло забить решающий гол и вся команда прыгает на тебя огромной кучей, смеясь и радуясь. Футбол, лёгкая атлетика, прыжки с шестом... Того чувства больше не будет, шоу уродов из стального сплава растопало его раз и навсегда.

3🌭3👻2🥰1😢1

24 Mar 2026, 16:34 UTC58 views15 reactionsread 11 August 2026

⠀ 🌧️ Знаете, когда-то мне повезло встретить детей, которые посмотрели на меня не со страхом, а с надеждой, – пацан зарядил мне мячом в голову. Бедняги, они оказались такими же, как я, и всё равно же бегали, смеялись, жили, а не существовали. Я разрешил им трогать свои механизмы, объяснял, как они работают, и эти сорванцы выглядели так, будто перед ними восьмое чудо света, а не стальной пиноккио. И знаете что? В тот д

🔥43❤‍🔥3💯2👍1💋1🦄1

9 Mar 2026, 20:26 UTC77 views23 reactionsread 11 August 2026

⠀ 🌧️ Итак, не буду долго распинаться, я и без того опоздал. Леди, поздравляю вас с прошедшим 8 Марта! Я рос с матерью, которая могла быть одновременно и гениальным учёным, и хорошей мамой (уж прошу прощения за тавтологию). Знаю, какие сильные Кори, Донна и Рейвен в бою и за его пределами. Видел, как Сара, не имея сверхспособностей, каждый день делает мир лучше для детей, на которых общество давно поставило негласный

👏7🔥64❤‍🔥4🍌1🦄1

7 Mar 2026, 20:16 UTC58 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026

⠀ Ого, это... довольно неожиданно. Большое спасибо, леди! Конечно, мне нравится. Это не может не нравиться. Я обязательно поставлю её на видном месте, чтобы смотреть и радовать глаз. ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ [ О, если бы вы могли увидеть лицо юноши, то непременно заметили, как его зачерствевшее лицо тронула улыбка... ] ⠀ ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ #mailbox ⚙️ #dialogue

32🥰2🔥1🦄1

7 Mar 2026, 12:20 UTC63 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026

⠀ Не ожидал, что мне на почту что-то придёт так скоро. ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ Здравствуйте! 😁 Как дела? Как настроение? Как жизнь? Как ничего? Как чего? Как чувствуете себя? Как состояние? ⠀ И тебе привет. Неплохо, ржавчины нет – и на том спасибо. У самого как? Спали? Как спалось? Как не спалось? Вообще Вы можете спать? Что снилось? Что не снилось? Хорошо спите? Почему сейчас не спите? Сколько часов сегодня спали? Во скольк

3🔥2🕊2👏1🦄1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @VictorStoneEOT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 377,900 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐕𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫 𝐒𝐭𝐨𝐧𝐞 (𝐝𝐞𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐲 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐚 𝐜𝐲𝐛𝐨𝐫𝐠)” (@VictorStoneEOT), 29 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VictorStoneEOT.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.