Channel
@VibeOps
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
101subscribers
+13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002620304161 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @VibeOps |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/VibeOps |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 05:40 | 101 | +3 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 20:38 | 98 | +4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 94 | +6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 88 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 88 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 3 | 60.0% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 40.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
GPT‑5.6 Sol Max работает ужасно МЕДЛЕННО. НО. Если требуется суперсложный анализ, стратегическая гипотеза, новаторский эксперимент, исследовательский подход — это задача ТОЛЬКО для Sol Max. Ни Sol Xhigh, ни Terra Max, так не могут вообще. Так может Fable 5 Xhigh, но это уже совсем другая история. При этом, если нет близкого к отличному контекста, запуск на Sol Max — будет лишь зря потраченные токены-лимиты-день…
Video, posted without a caption
В 18:00 UTC+2 (через полтора часа) будет стрим по настройке Codex агента в помощь девопсу, работающему на AWS в мульти-аккаунт среде. Заходите, пока буду настраивать и рассказывать, можно будет задать и получить ответ на свои вопросы.
👍2
Жми на нижнюю Terra! Глупость, но в Codex уже неделю две Terra. Ты же думаешь без разницы, какую выбирать, да? Вот результат исследования это странной проблемы: Открытый issue в официальном репозитории воспроизводит ровно ваш экран: первая Terra выбирает codex-auto-review, вторая — gpt-5.6-terra. Автор также связывает первую с поломкой tool calls: issue #36215. Практический вывод до исправления: • первую Terra в …
Не предлагал ничего делать с OpenCode, моделька сама решила запилить отдельного primary агента там, убрав у него все тулы, кроме тех, что нужно. Великолепно! Это gpt-5.6 Sol Max. Очень хорош, когда можно-нужно пробовать и ставить эксперименты.
Один из эффектов агентов на длинных дистанциях — утром можно обнаружить неочевидную архитектуру, которая радикально поменялась. Агент замучался и после нескольких изменений архитектур написал MCP сервер, чтобы с одной стороны дать приложению нужные данные из графа, с другой — не дать ему их менять. Прикольно. Изучаю-разбираюсь, как это работает. Это к слову, доказательство, что SDD подход в "примитивном виде" — ко…
Luna Max признана Sol Xhigh как хороший аудитор. Так что можно пользоваться и связка Terra Max + Luna Max выглядит очень привлекательно.
Luna vs Terra vs Sol Из того, что потестил лично и могу советовать. 1. GPT-5.6-Sol Max — это такой себе профессор-исследователь. Суперсложные задачи. 2. GPT-5.6-Terra Max — мегапрокаченный аспирант. Terra — это не "маленький Sol", это ДРУГАЯ модель, другой взгляд. Великолепен в тандеме с Sol как раз для второго взгляда. 3. GPT-5.6-Sol XHigh — моя рабочая лошадка на сейчас, главный оркестратор. Эти три — лучшие. G…
❤1
Terra и Luna подешевели, Sol без изменений. https://openai.com/index/advancing-the-price-performance-frontier-with-gpt-5-6/ Terra -20% Luna -80% (x5 дешевле!) Итого на теперь Luna в 10 раз(!) дешевле Terra. Соответственно изменятся и лимиты подписок ChatGPT Plus/Pro на Luna, они и так расходовались медленно, а сейчас станет ещё в пять раз медленней! В связи с этим Luna Max становится чемпионом в своём ценовом кл…
👍1
Claude Code + /insights Если у тебя в Claude Code поломалась команда /insights (как у меня), выдавая странные пустые данные — вероятно ты запускаешь неадекватное кол-во субагентов и экспериментируешь с настройками Claude Code (как я). Тогда количество сессий на диске может измеряться тысячами, а команда /insights проанализирует лишь маленький процент из них (чтобы не потратить все токены сразу на анализ). Проси Cl…
❤1
MCP уже/ещё не потерян/найден (но это не точно) https://blog.modelcontextprotocol.io/posts/2026-07-28-release-candidate/ Если коротко, То это "Stateless MCP". Если детальней: 1. No More Sticky Sessions 2. Faster Gateway Operations - new HTTP headers (Mcp-Method and Mcp-Name). 3. Long Tasks Don't Break Streams 4. OpenTelemetry, full JSON support, OAuth.
Terra в качестве оркестратора вместо Sol — вообще без проблем, прекрасно работает, агентов запускает чётко, однозначно рекомендую.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @VibeOps. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“VibeOps” (@VibeOps), 101 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VibeOps.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.