45/70🥺

Channel
𝑳𝒖𝒎𝒊è𝒓𝒆 /// 𝑽𝒆𝒛𝒂𝒍𝒚 (РЕСТ)
@VezalyPort
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
250subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002230172585 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @VezalyPort |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/VezalyPort |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:22 | 250 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:30 | 251 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:47 | 251 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 46.0%
- avg views ÷ 250 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 115
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 38.0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (31 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,301 |
| Reactions total | 319 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 09:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
319 reactions across 6 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 11.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5208575198558718801 | 36 | 11.3% | |
| custom 5208658503744389574 | 31 | 9.72% | |
| custom 5791847631554613033 | 30 | 9.40% | |
| custom 5791888382204317990 | 29 | 9.09% | |
| custom 5208942499866904031 | 26 | 8.15% | |
| custom 5791850539247472817 | 25 | 7.84% | |
| custom 5314672976807882378 | 24 | 7.52% | |
| custom 5314491149367413846 | 20 | 6.27% | |
| custom 5314805639757720653 | 18 | 5.64% | |
| custom 6298631382818101960 | 14 | 4.39% | |
| custom 6298431701198576159 | 11 | 3.45% | |
| custom 6296537302793459357 | 8 | 2.51% | |
| custom 5316823170580246689 | 7 | 2.19% | |
| custom 6298757869604969370 | 5 | 1.57% | |
| custom 6298812226711067462 | 5 | 1.57% | |
| custom 5206380139557976893 | 3 | 0.94% | |
| custom 5206556443670510488 | 3 | 0.94% | |
| custom 5314308454343534442 | 3 | 0.94% | |
| custom 6296546725951708489 | 3 | 0.94% | |
| custom 5206527555720481281 | 2 | 0.627% | |
| 8 further kinds | 16 | 5.02% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 319reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 23
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 2
- of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
- Most on one post
- 13
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @VezalyPort. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Sticker, posted without a caption
Posted without readable text
custom 629863138281810196013custom 629843170119857615911custom 62965373027934593578custom 62988122267110674625custom 62987578696049693704custom 62965467259517084893🐳2👻2
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
стыдно признать, но я че-то выгораю потихоньку. Вообще нету ни сил, ни настроения, ни мотивации. Каждый день смотрю на работы других дизайнеров и понимаю, что у меня скилл либо на месте стоит, либо регресс, ну это не дело, ребят. Так-что будет прям долгий рест, а потом я выйду, мб с новыми силами и, дай боже, я за это время сделаю прогресс, а не регресс
custom 57918883822043179903custom 62986313828181019601custom 62987578696049693701
привет, короче, 8 августа эра, а потом я слиняю в долгий рест
тапаем тапаем
ᅠᅠ🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩 ᅠᅠя от крови дракона и ᅠᅠдолжна быть сильной. ᅠᅠони должны видеть в ᅠᅠмоих глазах огонь, ᅠᅠаᅠᅠ ᅠнеᅠᅠᅠ слезы.
custom 57918883822043179902
Sticker, posted without a caption
Posted without readable text
custom 579184763155461303330custom 579185053924747281725custom 579188838220431799024
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @VezalyPort. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 288,141 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@InfoVezalyDes · 153 postsㅤ 𝃜 ⃞࣫ ⃞棚性 ⋮ #𝗴𝕚ְ𝅽⃛ٗ𝐟⃪𝙪𝒌̤𝐢⃪⃜ᮬᩙ𝐬⃪︭︭𝐬⃪︭︭𝐞𝐫֮﹙𝟲𝇄𝟟﹚
@bann_gifu · 902 postsАрхив
@ArchiveVezaly · 21 postD I A M O N D | design
@Diamondport · 61 post[ℐnfo] 𝒴oko
@INFO_YOKORT · 31 postᨦïᨩ info . akich ౨ৎ
@infoakich · 141 post<𝐈𝐧𝐟𝐨> 𝕹𝖊𝖎𝖖𝖎𝖓𝖌 𝕻𝖔𝖗𝖙
@Neiqing_Info · 851 postре-ONIMOLLY-ст
@onimolly · 461 post[ 𝘶𝘻𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘮𝘦 ] 𝖱𝖤𝖲𝖳.
@portuzurame · 721 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝑳𝒖𝒎𝒊è𝒓𝒆 /// 𝑽𝒆𝒛𝒂𝒍𝒚 (РЕСТ)” (@VezalyPort), 250 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VezalyPort.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.