Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ᝡᥱᥣ᥎ᥱ𝗍 𑜀ᦅᦅᥒ

Channel

‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ᝡᥱᥣ᥎ᥱ𝗍 𑜀ᦅᦅᥒ

@Veunsa

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,089subscribers

-28 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002393047362
TypeChannel
Username@Veunsa
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 September 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Veunsa

Topic

Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,0791,1171,09814 August 2026 — 1,117 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,113 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,112 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,101 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,090 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,079 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,097 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,094 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,082 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,082 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,100 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,089 subscribers1,08914 August 202619 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 36 days, net -28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,073–1,123 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 07:591,089-11
14 Sept 2026, 12:551,100+18
13 Sept 2026, 20:221,082no change
11 Sept 2026, 08:381,082-12
6 Sept 2026, 23:581,094-3
2 Sept 2026, 00:051,097+18
29 Aug 2026, 18:271,079-11
26 Aug 2026, 20:431,090-11
23 Aug 2026, 11:261,101-11
19 Aug 2026, 13:541,112-1
16 Aug 2026, 05:471,113-4
14 Aug 2026, 19:241,117first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 12 September 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.22%
avg views ÷ 1,089 subscribers
Avg views / post
35.1
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 September 2026
Posts held18 (12 September 202613 September 2026)
Views total631
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Sept 2026, 20:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

13 Sept 2026, 19:21 UTC13 viewsread 13 September 2026
Photo

🖤:𝖳𝗁𝖾𝗒 𝗅𝗈𝗈𝗄 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝖼𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗄𝗌 𝗂𝗇 𝗆𝗒 𝖺𝗋𝗆𝗈𝗋, 𝖻𝗎𝗍 𝖺𝗅𝗅 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖽 𝗂𝗌 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖺𝖻𝗒𝗌𝗌 𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖻𝖺𝖼𝗄. 💬💬 𝖨’𝗆 𝗇𝗈𝗍 𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗒𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖺 𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗋, 𝖨 𝖺𝗆 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖺𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗍𝗂𝖼 𝗂𝗍𝗌𝖾𝗅𝖿—𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖽 𝗂𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗌𝗁𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗐𝗌, 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗂𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗆𝗂𝖽𝗇𝗂𝗀𝗁𝗍, 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗌𝗂𝗅𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾 𝗂𝗇 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗈𝗌. 𝖯𝖾𝗈𝗉𝗅𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝗒 𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗆𝗒𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗒, 𝖻𝗎𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗀𝖾𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 𝗌𝗈𝗆𝖾 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗌 𝖺𝗋𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝖺𝗇𝗍 𝗍𝗈 𝖻𝖾 𝖿𝖾𝗅𝗍, 𝗇𝗈𝗍 𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗈𝖽. 𝖨 𝖺𝗆 𝖺𝗍 𝗉𝖾𝖺𝖼𝖾 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝗆𝗒 𝗈𝗐𝗇 𝖽𝖺𝗋𝗄𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗌; 𝗂𝗍’𝗌 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗈𝗇𝗅𝗒 𝗉𝗅𝖺𝖼𝖾 𝗐𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾 𝖨 𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗅𝗒 𝗌𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖾. 💬💬💬 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤

13 Sept 2026, 17:38 UTC12 viewsread 13 September 2026
Forwarded from @welariusPhoto

‌ ‌ ࣪ ⨍𝗈𝗋𝗐𝖺𝗋𝖽 𝗍𝗁𝗂𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗀𝖾𝂅‌ 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝖨’𝗅𝗅 𝗆𝖺𝗄𝖾 𝗒𝗈𝗎 𝖺 𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗒𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍 𝖻𝖺𝗌𝖾̧𝖽 𝗈𝗇 𝗒𝗈𝗎𝗋 𝗏𝗂𝖻𝖾𝂅‌ 𝖿𝖾𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖺 𝖻𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗈𝗋 𝖺𝗋𝗍𑪒𝗂𝗌𝗍 𝗍𝗁𝖺𝗍 ꭑ𝖺𝗍𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗌 𝗒𝗈𝗎 𝂅‌ 𓎟𓎟𓎟𓎟 ⧾ 𓎟𓎟𓎟𓎟ㅤ ‌ 𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗍 𓏻 𝟣𝟧 𝂅‌ 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗍𝖾 𝂅‌ 𝗆𝗎𝗌𝗍ׅ 𝗃𝗈𝗂𝗇 ‌

13 Sept 2026, 17:18 UTC21 viewsread 13 September 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed ㅤㅤᥳᩛᦅɾ𐔎

13 Sept 2026, 17:17 UTC21 viewsread 13 September 2026

الان میام خوشحالت کنم

Signed ㅤㅤᥳᩛᦅɾ𐔎

13 Sept 2026, 17:08 UTC17 viewsread 13 September 2026
Forwarded from @boosegar

این پیامو فوروارد کنید تا ازتون یک سوال درمورد چنلتون بپرسم و جواب بدید 🦌 توی چنلتون می‌گردم و اگر چیز بامزه‌ای بود فوروارد میکنم اینجا

13 Sept 2026, 17:08 UTC19 viewsread 13 September 2026
Forwarded from @boosegar

«اه از اینکه همه چیز به مرگ ختم بشود ناراحتم! باید بستنی بخوریم، لطفا صف بگیرید!!»

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Veunsa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ᝡᥱᥣ᥎ᥱ𝗍 𑜀ᦅᦅᥒ” (@Veunsa), 1,089 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Veunsa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.