Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ветеринарный Дайджест

Channel

Ветеринарный Дайджест

@VeterinaryDigest

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,593subscribers

+238 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001089698375
TypeChannel
Username@VeterinaryDigest
DescriptionНовостной блог (консультаций для владельцев нет!) Официальный канал СМИ ✔️ Мы за доказательную ветмед ➡️ВК: https://vk.com/vet_news По вопросам: @chistova_ek #проектфарфан: @rainwisp https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/69cd0ccbafb2662eee1abdca
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held62
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/VeterinaryDigest

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

10,35410,59310,473.56 August 202612 November 2026
62 measurements spanning 99 days, net +238. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,318–10,629 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 23:1710,593+2
10 Nov 2026, 20:4410,591+2
9 Nov 2026, 07:2010,589+5
7 Nov 2026, 20:0110,584+2
6 Nov 2026, 18:4110,582+1
5 Nov 2026, 22:0510,581+14
4 Nov 2026, 19:0810,567-3
1 Nov 2026, 22:3810,570-1
31 Oct 2026, 20:5610,571+1
30 Oct 2026, 21:0610,570+3
29 Oct 2026, 20:2910,567-3
28 Oct 2026, 18:4010,570-3
27 Oct 2026, 18:4510,573+1
26 Oct 2026, 19:0710,572-1
24 Oct 2026, 20:0810,573+4
23 Oct 2026, 19:4710,569-1
22 Oct 2026, 20:0710,570-3
21 Oct 2026, 16:2110,573+4
20 Oct 2026, 14:3610,569+4
19 Oct 2026, 15:5410,565first reading

Engagement

129 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.43%
avg views ÷ 10,593 subscribers
Avg views / post
681
73 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.935%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
73
of 129 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held129 (19 July 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total49,717
Reactions total465
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 22:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,840
Videos
≈147
Links
≈4,890

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 48s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,334 reactions across 127 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤43132.3%
👍21115.8%
🔥19614.7%
💩614.57%
👀523.90%
🤣503.75%
👎483.60%
😢352.62%
👏302.25%
😭282.10%
❤‍🔥181.35%
🤬171.27%
🤔151.12%
😁141.05%
😐130.975%
💔110.825%
🗿110.825%
🤪110.825%
😱100.75%
🥰90.675%
19 further kinds634.72%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 128 of the 129 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,362 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 129 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 128 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @VeterinaryDigest. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 129 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 14 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
4.65%
6 of 129 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
6
posts carrying an erid · 6 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
1,060
over 6 measured posts
Median views · rest
773
over 122 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzquiQZb813 August 20263 August 2026
2VtzqvavVBx128 July 202628 July 2026
2VtzqvkHtZk15 November 20265 November 2026
2VtzqvyAym4129 July 202629 July 2026
2Vtzqw6cbCP125 August 202625 August 2026
2VtzqwJdpDc13 November 20263 November 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 129 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 14 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 73 posts held from the last 30 days (6.85%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 09:01 UTC358 views3 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

🤖 ИИ в ветеринарии: инструмент или хайп? Нейросети вызывают много вопросов. Какие задачи им можно доверить? Где они помогают врачу, а где требуют особенно внимательной проверки? 24 ноября 2026 года приглашаем на II конференцию «Новые ветеринарные технологии», посвящённую искусственному интеллекту в ветеринарии. Поговорим о возможностях и ограничениях ИИ, его практической пользе и месте в работе ветеринарного специ…

❤3

13 Nov 2026, 20:54 UTC571 views22 reactions1 Starread 14 November 2026
Photo

А как у вас?

🔥16🤣4👌2

12 Nov 2026, 17:45 UTC717 views3 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Клиническое ведение пациентов с септическим перитонитом и тромбозом аорты после эмболизации опухоли печени у собаки Септический перитонит, тромбоз аорты и острое повреждение почек: опубликован случай успешного лечения собаки после эмболизации опухоли печени Продолжение читать по ссылке: https://vetdigest.ru/articles/klinicheskoe-vedenie-pacientov-s-septicheskim-peritonitom-i-trombozom-aorty-posle-embolizacii-opuhol…

❤3

12 Nov 2026, 14:37 UTC686 views2 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Дислипидемия у собак с азотемией: связь с почечной дисфункцией У собак с азотемией обнаружили повышение холестерина и триглицеридов: может ли липидный профиль отражать тяжесть болезни почек? Индийские исследователи выявили нарушения липидного обмена у собак с азотемией. У животных были повышены концентрации общего холестерина, триглицеридов и липопротеинов низкой плотности. Однако выраженность этих изменений не уве…

❤2

12 Nov 2026, 12:34 UTC621 views6 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Пимобендан при дисплазии трикуспидального клапана у собак: исследование выявило признаки обратного ремоделирования сердца Американские ветеринарные кардиологи обнаружили уменьшение размеров правого желудочка и фиброзного кольца трикуспидального клапана у собак с тяжёлой трикуспидальной регургитацией после назначения пимобендана. Однако пока неизвестно, влияет ли такая терапия на развитие сердечной недостаточности и …

✍2❤2👍1🔥1

12 Nov 2026, 11:36 UTC602 views3 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Токсоплазмоз у собак может сопровождаться тяжёлыми поражениями глаз вплоть до необратимой слепоты результаты нового исследования Продолжение читать по ссылке: https://vetdigest.ru/articles/toksoplazmoz-u-sobak-mozhet-soprovozhdatsya-tyazhelymi-porazheniyami-glaz-vplot-do-neobratimoy-slepoty

❤3

12 Nov 2026, 10:29 UTC613 views1 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Деслорелин у кастрированных кобелей: результаты исследования с плацебо Деслорелин уменьшил сексуальное внимание других кобелей к кастрированным собакам: результаты рандомизированного исследования Продолжение читать по ссылке: https://vetdigest.ru/articles/deslorelin-u-kastrirovannyh-kobeley-rezultaty-issledovaniya-s-placebo

❤1

12 Nov 2026, 07:27 UTC635 views1 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Грипп птиц H5 продолжает генетически изменяться: исследователи выявили 12 генотипов вируса в Лаосе В Лаосе выявили 12 генотипов высокопатогенного гриппа птиц: обнаружены генетические связи с вирусами, заражавшими людей Продолжение читать по ссылке: https://vetdigest.ru/articles/gripp-ptic-h5-prodolzhaet-geneticheski-izmenyatsya-issledovateli-vyyavili-12-genotipov-virusa-v-laose

👎1

11 Nov 2026, 23:19 UTC711 views17 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Мракобесие в нефрологии.. «Опасный ренал»: действительно ли почечные диеты вредят собакам и кошкам? #боремся с мракобесием Продолжение читать по ссылке: https://vetdigest.ru/articles/mrakobesie-v-nefrologii

❤9👏4💩2🔥2

11 Nov 2026, 20:51 UTC724 views6 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

👩‍⚕👨‍⚕Коллеги, мы приглашаем Вас присоединиться к Поволжскому ветеринарному форуму Volga Vet Самара 2026 к секциям: 💊 Дерматология 🦴 Диетология 🧪 Эндокринология 🐾 Ветеринарный форум Volga Vet будет проводиться в Самаре 19 ноября 2026 по адресу ул. Ново-Садовая, 14 💉 🎁 Розыгрыш призов от партнеров 🎁 Приятные и полезные подарки от Epi-derm.ru 😋 Вкусный и горячий кофе-брейк 👉 Вход на форум бесплатный при наличии предва…

❤4🔥1🥰1

11 Nov 2026, 13:37 UTC736 views12 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Уважаемые коллеги, добрый день! Команда проекта «Одной Крови» приглашает вашу клинику принять участие в тестировании нового функционала Портала донорской помощи животным. Изначально Портал был создан для объединения владельцев животных, помогая быстрее находить доноров в экстренной ситуации. Сейчас мы работаем над расширением возможностей Портала и разрабатываем функционал для ветеринарных банков крови. Он позволи…

❤5✍3🔥3💩1

10 Nov 2026, 16:03 UTC719 views10 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

#проектфарфан |Рубрика «Фиолетовые будни» от Смольниковой Яны, врача лабораторной диагностики, цитолога, дерматолога. ВЦ «Ветеринарная служба N1», СПб Telegram | ВК 🫟 Пиогранулематозное воспаление - это особый тип воспаления, при котором в цитологических препаратах одновременно присутствуют нейтрофилы и значительное количество макрофагов, в том числе эпителиоидных и гигантских многоядерных клеток. 🔬 Цитологическая …

❤8🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 129 posts we hold for @VeterinaryDigest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@VeterinaryDigest edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
5 November 2026
Most recent edit
5 November 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ВЕТКЭТ
@vetcatru · 81,983
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 September 2026
VET's HUB ®
@vets_hub · 22,559
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 September 2026
الطب البيطري veterinary medicine
@DrAtefElhendi · 26,715
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 September 2026
المكتبة البيطرية للدكتور حامد عطيه
@vet100 · 26,855
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ветеринарный Дайджест” (@VeterinaryDigest), 10,593 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VeterinaryDigest.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.