Channel
@Venture_manual
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
484subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002187452568 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Venture_manual |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Venture_manual |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:54 | 484 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:31 | 485 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:21 | 485 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (21 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,567 |
| Reactions total | 52 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 04:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
52 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 21 | 40.4% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 32.7% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 11.5% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 5.77% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 3.85% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 1.92% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 1.92% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.92% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Иногда самые полезные мысли о бизнесе и технологиях находятся не в крупных медиа, а в небольших авторских каналах Кто-то честно рассказывает, как запускает продукт и ищет клиентов. Кто-то разбирает AI, разработку и управление командой. Кто-то делится рабочими приемами в маркетинге и PR — без пересказа очевидных вещей. За последнее время таких каналов в ленте накопилось довольно много. В итоге мы с коллегами объедин…
❤2
Video, posted without a caption
🔥3😁2👍1
Смотрел тут серию "Смешариков" 🤗🤨про Кузинатру - загадочную сущность, которая вроде бы должна дать смысл, но на деле больше похожа на мифическую цель, за которой легко бежать, не замечая реальности? 🤔🌌 В венчуре и стартапах таких «кузинатр» тоже хватает. Это те красивые, громкие и очень убедительные идеи, которые звучат как будущее, но часто скрывают отсутствие чёткого продукта, понятного пользователя и доказанного …
👍3
Для тех кто не знает или забыл, есть такой мой ресурс как Лексикон инвестиционных терминов: https://t.me/Invest_lexicon
🔥2❤🔥1👌1
Мне предложили прокомментировать сделку между Nvidia и ИИ-лабораторией Ильи Суцкевера на сумму $5 млрд в том контексте, что в суперранний стартап без продукта и выручки только со звездной командой и амбициями – вкладывают огромные суммы. Вот пример идеального венчура – не чего-то российского. 🚀💰 Оказалось, что показалось! 🤔 Эту сделку нельзя ставить в один ряд даже с идеальными венчурными инвестициями, как, наприме…
🔥2🤔1
Есть готовое решение для нефтегаза — но до заказчика сложно дойти? До 10 августа подайте проект на Технологические дни TNF 2026 и получите возможность представить его экспертам шести компаний-заказчиков ТЭК: ▪️ ЛУКОЙЛ ▪️ Сургутнефтегаз ▪️ НОВАТЭК ▪️ КазМунайГаз ▪️ QazaqGaz ▪️ Нефтиса Заказчики ищут решения, готовые к пилоту или опытно-промышленным испытаниям: оборудование, ПО и ИИ, технологии бурения и добычи, гео…
👍1
#запрос 📝 На запрос от 8 июля по поиску игр откликнулось 12, из них: • 2 просто поинтересоваться 🧐 • 3 проекта на очень ранней стадии 🌱 • 3 игровые проекты не в фокусе, но нашли другие темы 🎯 • 3 отметились и пропали (буду пинговать) 📡 • 1 проект на этой неделе будет представлен на Инвестиционный комитет 📅 Запрос не закрыт!! Пишите под этим обновлением, если есть предложения по играм!! 🚀 Напоминаю: Ищу проекты ин…
👍5
Тем временем на Витрине проектов новые поступления и оба проекта родом с Юга России 🌞📦: 1. Из Адыгеи проект «Собачий Зож: натуральные индивидуальные рационы для собак» 🐕🥩. Это ИТ-проект, и у меня нет готового инвестора под него. Но уверен, что таким проектам важнее целевая платежеспособная аудитория 🎯💰, чем деньги инвестора. Как заядлый собачник, буду помогать основателю, чем могу: продвигать среди знакомых органи…
Мне в комментариях задали вопрос про "шринкфляцию" 🤔 Шринкфляция (shrinkflation) - это скрытое повышение цены: вы платите столько же, но получаете меньше. В офлайне -меньше граммов в пачке, меньше яиц в упаковке📦. Подумал, причем тут инновационные стартапы или IT, НО эту логику можно "подтянуть" и тут -меньше функций, урезанные лимиты или ухудшенный саппорт при той же стоимости подписки 📉. Суть та же: незаметное сн…
🔥3
К чему кипиш вокруг ключевой ставки? 🤔 Ведь мой канал для стартаперов, напоминаю: 🚀 «Ключ» определяет стоимость денег в экономике: по этой ставке ЦБ РФ даёт кредиты банкам и принимает от них деньги на депозиты. 💰 Проще говоря, это «цена денег» для банков, а они уже накручивают сверху свой процент для кредитов предприятиям, а по депозитам населения и компаний устанавливают проценты ниже «ключа» - чтобы заработать. 📉📈…
👍2
👆такое решение предусмотрели только 6 из 23 проголосовавших. Это наверное лучшее из возможных решений в настоящее время!
❗️Банк России снова снизил ключевую ставку с 14,25% до 14% годовых, сообщает регулятор.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Venture_manual. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 819,432 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Венчур: инструкция” (@Venture_manual), 484 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Venture_manual.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.