Channel
@Venticf
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
491subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002691609247 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Venticf |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Venticf |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 05:40 | 491 | -1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 13:18 | 492 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:38 | 496 | +4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:08 | 492 | -4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 496 | +10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:23 | 486 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 484 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
114 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 32 | 28.1% | |
| custom 5373107544468254958 | 27 | 23.7% | |
| custom 5370801383253506237 | 24 | 21.1% | |
| ❤ | 21 | 18.4% | |
| custom 5453975890251762150 | 4 | 3.51% | |
| custom 5454335748381622710 | 3 | 2.63% | |
| custom 5386574955590750940 | 2 | 1.75% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 0.877% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 114 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
— Бл*н! Я придумала такоой клевый лор в свой комикс/сериал/че там еще есть, но у меня нет нормальной аудитории, которая это оценит!😭 🔢🔢🔢🔢🔢🔢🔢🔢🔢 🤩🤩ТОГДА ДОБРО ПОЖАЛОВАТЬ В 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🤩🤩 🤩 🅰️🅰️!!1! В этом кф ты можешь поделиться всем, что связано с твоим проектом. Тейк бот 🌟Навигация 🌟Вп пост #рт
Signed πΑπ𝖔ρ𝖆ᴛᕼ𝚞𝓴 𝙺𝓸𝙯ꄲʟ𝖎𝓷𝘢 !! [ 𝓱𝓮/𝓱𝓲𝓼 ] 𝐊𝐞𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐭𝐡 𝐏𝐡𝐞𝐥𝐩𝐬 𝐧𝟏 𝐟𝐚𝐧 !! [ 🍃🧹]
𝃚 ㅤ 🤩🌟𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𔘓𝆬⃝ 𝘿𝙖𝙞𝙡𝙮𝘾𝙛🤩 ㅤ 𝅄⎯ֺ⎯ᮬ͜⎯ִ⎯⎯ֺ⎯ᮬ͜⎯ִ⎯ֺֺ ⸼ 🤩🤩🤩𝓒𝙧𝙚𝙙𝙞𝙩 : @rkdhsdl120721 (X) ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ 𔕛 𝙗𝙤𝙤𝙨𝙩 🤩
❤5
Signed 𝙇𝙪𝙜𝙣𝙚𝙧
𝃚 ㅤ 🤩🌟𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𔘓𝆬⃝ 𝘿𝙖𝙞𝙡𝙮𝘾𝙛🤩 ㅤ 𝅄⎯ֺ⎯ᮬ͜⎯ִ⎯⎯ֺ⎯ᮬ͜⎯ִ⎯ֺֺ ⸼ 🤩🤩🤩𝓒𝙧𝙚𝙙𝙞𝙩 : @sakuraranndo (X) ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ 𔕛 𝙗𝙤𝙤𝙨𝙩 🤩
❤4custom 53708013832535062373
Signed 𝙇𝙪𝙜𝙣𝙚𝙧
𝃚 ㅤ 🤩🌟𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𔘓𝆬⃝ 𝘿𝙖𝙞𝙡𝙮𝘾𝙛🤩 ㅤ 𝅄⎯ֺ⎯ᮬ͜⎯ִ⎯⎯ֺ⎯ᮬ͜⎯ִ⎯ֺֺ ⸼ 🤩🤩🤩𝓒𝙧𝙚𝙙𝙞𝙩 : @haryu_chee (X) ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ 𔕛 𝙗𝙤𝙤𝙨𝙩 🤩
❤2custom 53708013832535062372
Signed 𝙇𝙪𝙜𝙣𝙚𝙧
Новое правило кф: кто не подписан на мой щп тот получит бан на пожизненное и 10-часовой просмотр артов с даливенами без перерывов @dysfunctional_lagner 🌪️
custom 53731075444682549589
Signed 𝙇𝙪𝙜𝙣𝙚𝙧
Пришёл таки! Я в полном восторге!🙏🏻 𝘇Zz ⃞ #тейк ੭୧┊ ° @venticf Ꮺ〢
custom 53731075444682549582
Signed Венти тейк 🤖
𝃚 ㅤ 🤩🌟𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𔘓𝆬⃝ 𝘿𝙖𝙞𝙡𝙮𝘾𝙛🤩 ㅤ 𝅄⎯ֺ⎯ᮬ͜⎯ִ⎯⎯ֺ⎯ᮬ͜⎯ִ⎯ֺֺ ⸼ 🤩🤩🤩𝓒𝙧𝙚𝙙𝙞𝙩 : @uzuki_o4o5 (X) ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ 𔕛 𝙗𝙤𝙤𝙨𝙩 🤩
custom 53708013832535062373
Signed 𝙇𝙪𝙜𝙣𝙚𝙧
𝃚 ㅤ ㅤ 𝙑𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𔘓𝆬⃝ 𝘿𝙖𝙞𝙡𝙮𝘾𝙛 ㅤ 𝅄⎯ֺ⎯ᮬ͜⎯ִ⎯⎯ֺ⎯ᮬ͜⎯ִ⎯ֺֺ ⸼ ᨳ꯭꒰ֺ 𝅄𖹭⁾̸࣮ᰱᩫ ֺ𝓒𝙧𝙚𝙙𝙞𝙩 : @dxnut00 ( Х ) ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ 𔕛 𝙗𝙤𝙤𝙨𝙩
💘6custom 53731075444682549583custom 53708013832535062371custom 54539758902517621501custom 54543357483816227101
Signed Петусина #поприказугенералагавсаяфанВенти№1
𝃚 ㅤ 🤩🌟𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𔘓𝆬⃝ 𝘿𝙖𝙞𝙡𝙮𝘾𝙛🤩 ㅤ 𝅄⎯ֺ⎯ᮬ͜⎯ִ⎯⎯ֺ⎯ᮬ͜⎯ִ⎯ֺֺ ⸼ 🤩🤩🤩𝓒𝙧𝙚𝙙𝙞𝙩 : @x4_i171 (X) ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ 𔕛 𝙗𝙤𝙤𝙨𝙩 🤩
💘3custom 54539758902517621502custom 53708013832535062371custom 53731075444682549581custom 54543357483816227101
Signed 𝙇𝙪𝙜𝙣𝙚𝙧
𝃚 ㅤ 🤩🌟𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𔘓𝆬⃝ 𝘿𝙖𝙞𝙡𝙮𝘾𝙛🤩 ㅤ 𝅄⎯ֺ⎯ᮬ͜⎯ִ⎯⎯ֺ⎯ᮬ͜⎯ִ⎯ֺֺ ⸼ 🤩🤩🤩𝓒𝙧𝙚𝙙𝙞𝙩 : @anemovens (X) ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ 𔕛 𝙗𝙤𝙤𝙨𝙩 🤩
custom 53731075444682549584custom 53708013832535062372💘1custom 54539758902517621501
Signed 𝙇𝙪𝙜𝙣𝙚𝙧
𝃚 ㅤ ㅤ 𝙑𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𔘓𝆬⃝ 𝘿𝙖𝙞𝙡𝙮𝘾𝙛 ㅤ 𝅄⎯ֺ⎯ᮬ͜⎯ִ⎯⎯ֺ⎯ᮬ͜⎯ִ⎯ֺֺ ⸼ ᨳ꯭꒰ֺ 𝅄𖹭⁾̸࣮ᰱᩫ ֺ𝓒𝙧𝙚𝙙𝙞𝙩 : @dayuele ( Х ) ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ 𔕛 𝙗𝙤𝙤𝙨𝙩
❤4💘1custom 53708013832535062371
Signed Петусина #поприказугенералагавсаяфанВенти№1
𝃚 ㅤ 🤩🌟𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𔘓𝆬⃝ 𝘿𝙖𝙞𝙡𝙮𝘾𝙛🤩 ㅤ 𝅄⎯ֺ⎯ᮬ͜⎯ִ⎯⎯ֺ⎯ᮬ͜⎯ִ⎯ֺֺ ⸼ 🤩🤩🤩𝓒𝙧𝙚𝙙𝙞𝙩 : @heyalvern (tt) ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ 𔕛 𝙗𝙤𝙤𝙨𝙩 🤩
custom 53731075444682549585custom 53708013832535062372💘1custom 54543357483816227101
Signed 𝙇𝙪𝙜𝙣𝙚𝙧
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Venticf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Venticf named 13 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“✘ Venti⁺ ݃confession/daily꒷꒥” (@Venticf), 491 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Venticf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.