Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝗩𝗲𝗹𝘃𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲’𝘀 𝗯𝗹𝗼𝗴

@Velvettiks_HP

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

141subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003234796556
TypeChannel
Username@Velvettiks_HP
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Velvettiks_HP

Growth

1418 Aug 2026, 01:36 — 141 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 22:15 — 141 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 01:368 Aug 2026, 22:15
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 140–142 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 22:15141no change
8 Aug 2026, 01:36141first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
67.7%
avg views ÷ 141 subscribers
Avg views / post
95.5
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.84%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held20 (18 April 202631 July 2026)
Views total1,337
Reactions total54
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 22:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
40
Videos
1
Links
71

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

93 reactions across 12 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54295543840841751752425.8%
custom 53458339566778068491415.1%
custom 53462354502206349671314.0%
custom 53077858850795982811010.8%
custom 53709811662895341041010.8%
custom 525139792517033585266.45%
custom 596322856051566930355.38%
custom 528051716778205823844.30%
custom 528306787584472174844.30%
custom 587970672810210962222.15%
custom 522234592456659853411.08%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 93reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 April 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 16:11 UTC73 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🥹🥹🥹🤩🌟🌟🌟🌟🥹 🤩🤩🥹🥹🥹🤭🎀 🥹🌟🥹🥹😢😢😢 😚ы решил #AGAIN слиться ??? 🤩🤩🤩🩷наешь, у меня есть дела по важнее, чем долбиться без умолку в твою плоскую рожу 🤢😱😱 #LOLOL 🤩💓ал ❗️ Ты ведь НЕ ПОЙДЁШЬ ?! Правда ?! BABE, скажи, что ты понимаешь, что он просто хочет поебаться и задобрить тебя 🤨🤨🤨 #OLDCRINGETV 39М🔥16М ➡️92М 🙂74М 💬

custom 54295543840841751751

29 Jul 2026, 17:27 UTC100 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🥹🥹🥹🤩🌟🌟🌟🌟🥹 🤩🤩🥹🥹🥹🤭🎀 🥹🌟🥹🥹 😚о что вы ебетесь давно не секрет, ВОКС 🙄 🤩🤩Удивительно, что даже в твоем положении ты решил сделать мне замечание 😤😤 #NEVERMIND Забавно, не так ли ? 💩💩💩 39М🔥16М ➡️92М 🙂74М 💬

custom 54295543840841751753

29 Jul 2026, 10:08 UTC107 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🥹🥹🥹🤩🌟🌟🌟🌟🥹 🤩🤩🥹🥹🥹🤭🎀 🥹🌟🥹🥹🔴🔴🔴🙄 🤩🌸абей, Вал #BESTIEHERE 🤩🤩🤩🔠очему бы тебе не пользоваться им, пока он подлизывает тебе задницу ??? 🤨 🤩🤩😹то насчёт шоппинга ❓❓ Babe !! Я лучше других знаю ЧТО тебе сейчас нужно ! 🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩#NEWCLOTHES 39М🔥16М ➡️92М 🙂74М 💬

custom 52830678758447217482custom 52223459245665985341custom 52513979251703358521

28 Jul 2026, 23:39 UTC109 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🥹🥹🥹🤩🌟🌟🌟🌟🥹 🤩🤩🥹🥹🥹🤭🎀 🥹🌟🥹🥹😹😹!!! 🤮🤮🤮 🤩Можешь не продолжать 🤢 #STOPIT Я достаточно прожила с вами двумя чтобы понять как вы "любите ебаться друг с другом" 🙄🙄🙄 🤩🤩Почему бы тебе ПРОСТО не перестать думать о нем ❓ #SMARTIDEA 39М🔥16М ➡️92М 🙂74М 💬

custom 54295543840841751755custom 52513979251703358522custom 53458339566778068492custom 52805171677820582381

28 Jul 2026, 22:59 UTC89 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🥹🥹🥹🤩🌟🌟🌟🌟🥹 🤩🤩🥹🥹🥹🤭🎀 🥹🌟🥹🥹😚 этом и проблема, что я тебя ЗНАЮ и как ты течешь по этому ублюдку 🤨💢 🤩🤩💜ватит заливать мне эту хуйню #BORING не подлизывайся пока я злюсь на тебя и Вокса 🌟🤮 🔠🔠 🔠🔠🔠 мешали мне спать типо ВСЮ НОЧЬ??? 😤😤 23М🔥67М ➡️32М 🙂90М 💬

custom 54295543840841751757custom 52830678758447217482custom 52513979251703358521custom 52805171677820582381

28 Jul 2026, 22:23 UTC104 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🥹🥹🥹🤩🌟🌟🌟🌟🥹 🤩🤩🥹🥹🥹🤭🎀 🥹🌟🥹🥹🔠🔠🔠my babydolls 😉 🤩😚 ал БУКВАЛЬНО упраашивал меня вернуться к НАШИМ любимым followers😍💓 #LOLOL 🤩🤩🤩Моим условием было запереть Вокса в самый дальний чулан, но он вместо этого решил с ним ПОЕБАТЬСЯ ❗️❗️❗️ #AREYOUFUCKINGKIDDINGME 🤬🤬🤬 🤩🌸ам двоим должно быть СТЫД..а впрочем будто бы это что-то изменит FCK YOU 2 🖕🖕 10М🔥20М ➡️60М 🙂40М 💬

custom 54295543840841751758custom 52513979251703358522custom 52805171677820582382custom 53458339566778068491

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Velvettiks_HP. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 121,860 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝗩𝗲𝗹𝘃𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲’𝘀 𝗯𝗹𝗼𝗴” (@Velvettiks_HP), 141 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Velvettiks_HP.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.