Channel
@Velithcos
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
134subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003904020373 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Velithcos |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 12 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Velithcos |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:08 | 134 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 135 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 135 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (12 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,039 |
| Reactions total | 531 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 23:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
599 reactions across 16 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5474532488493697335 | 204 | 34.1% | |
| custom 5224355690088276665 | 117 | 19.5% | |
| custom 5226826954140851360 | 98 | 16.4% | |
| custom 5224366393146776768 | 47 | 7.85% | |
| custom 5226680057669392850 | 36 | 6.01% | |
| custom 5224455075631502776 | 29 | 4.84% | |
| custom 5224381309568195222 | 26 | 4.34% | |
| custom 5224251197828939578 | 19 | 3.17% | |
| custom 5224575764212523062 | 13 | 2.17% | |
| custom 5224505416943181646 | 5 | 0.835% | |
| custom 5224651514550719690 | 4 | 0.668% | |
| custom 5224295569136065021 | 1 | 0.167% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 599reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Velithcos. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
рыжий рыжий конопатый бе бе бе
custom 52268269541408513609custom 52243663931467767686custom 54745324884936973355custom 52243556900882766651custom 52244550756315027761custom 52245054169431816461
прикиньте я девочка…
custom 522682695414085136028custom 547453248849369733517custom 522435569008827666513
ну мы😏
custom 547453248849369733525custom 52268269541408513609custom 52266800576693928508custom 52243556900882766652custom 52244550756315027761custom 52245054169431816461
🐈⬛Вот такие мы красоточки💍 🫥Любими Нил: тык
custom 547453248849369733516custom 52268269541408513609custom 52243663931467767686custom 52243556900882766652custom 52266800576693928501
С любимой💗
custom 522668005766939285016custom 547453248849369733511custom 52268269541408513608custom 52243556900882766651
хэй гайс у нас все найс
custom 547453248849369733519custom 522682695414085136012custom 52244550756315027769custom 52243556900882766652
ну мыыыыы 💕
custom 522425119782893957819custom 54745324884936973357custom 52243556900882766656custom 52242955691360650211custom 52245054169431816461
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 522435569008827666512custom 54745324884936973357custom 52266800576693928502
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 547453248849369733514custom 52243556900882766657custom 52244550756315027765
💋🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤💋 💐🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍💐 «𝐈 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐰𝐚𝐧𝐭 𝐭𝐨 𝐠𝐨 𝐨𝐧 𝐚 𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐩! 𝐀𝐧𝐝 𝐈 𝐝𝐨𝐧'𝐭 𝐜𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐰𝐞 𝐠𝐨, 𝐚𝐬 𝐥𝐨𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐬 𝐰𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐟𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐬 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐮𝐬.» 💋💋💋💋🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍💐 💋💋💋💋 💐𝐏𝐇𝐎𝐓𝐎💐 💋💋💋💋 #navia 💋💋💋💋 #genshinimpact 𝓡𝓽1️⃣𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓬𝓽𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓼? #косплейнася
custom 547453248849369733511custom 52243556900882766656custom 52243813095681952226
пока мне нечего делать я рисую себя и Насю 💕
custom 522438130956819522220custom 547453248849369733512custom 52243556900882766659custom 52243663931467767681
влетаю с двух ног с Вакасой
custom 547453248849369733532custom 522435569008827666520custom 522457576421252306213custom 52268269541408513604custom 52243663931467767681custom 52245054169431816461
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @Velithcos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 50,041 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Velith_cos” (@Velithcos), 134 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Velithcos.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.