Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Veai - управляемый AI в разработкe

@Veaicode

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

231subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003190888058
TypeChannel
Username@Veaicode
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 31 December 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Veaicode

Growth

230231230.58 Aug 2026, 00:05 — 230 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 10:16 — 230 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 21:40 — 231 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 00:058 Aug 2026, 21:40
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 230–231 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 21:40231+1
8 Aug 2026, 10:16230no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:05230first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 13 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
82.7%
avg views ÷ 231 subscribers
Avg views / post
191
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026
Posts held19 (13 April 202623 July 2026)
Views total382
Reactions total10
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 03s
Average length
4m 03s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

138 reactions across 18 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5539.9%
🔥2820.3%
👏117.97%
👌85.80%
75.07%
🏆75.07%
💯75.07%
👀64.35%
🤝32.17%
❤‍🔥21.45%
👻10.725%
🤓10.725%
🤔10.725%
🦄10.725%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 138reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 19 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Veaicode. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 April 2026 to 23 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Jul 2026, 16:46 UTC143 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сколько стоит контроль над ИИ-агентом? Считаем экономику #полезное📚 Подготовка спецификации, написание тестов до кода и отдельное ревью требуют времени разработчиков. Возникают два вопроса: сколько контроля нужно конкретной задаче и когда затраты на него окупаются? Полагаться только на свои ощущения в таких вопросах очень опрометчиво. В одном из экспериментов разработчики считали, что ИИ ускорил их примерно на 20%.

👀21👍1🤓1

16 Jul 2026, 14:52 UTC239 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚀 В Veai 5.15 расход агента виден в моменте, а не в конце месяца. Ключевая ценность: контроль бюджета на ИИ-разработку без ручного аудита. В каждом чате под полем ввода видно, сколько токенов ушло, сколько осталось в контексте и во сколько сессия обошлась в деньгах, – прямо во время работы, без похода в биллинг. Тарификация по минутам, а не по токенам: все топ-модели стоят одинаково за минуту работы. Разработчик вы

👍3👀1🤝1

8 Jul 2026, 13:08 UTC271 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Veai и «Емдев» создают российскую экосистему корпоративного ПО со встроенным управляемым ИИ Российские компании «ИИтех», разработчик платформы управляемого искусственного интеллекта Veai, и «Емдев», поставщик решений «Инкоманд» и «Энтакси» для создания корпоративных цифровых пространств, объявили о стратегическом партнерстве. Объединение усилий с компанией «Емдев» — это шаг к созданию комплексной отечественной плат

3👏3👀2🔥1

22 Jun 2026, 15:20 UTC347 views5 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍3❤‍🔥1👏1

22 Jun 2026, 15:20 UTC290 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🚀 В Veai 5.13 Наш агент знает тебя и твой проект с первой минуты. Ключевая ценность: быстрый выход новой команды на продуктивность: агент с первой минуты работает по правилам вашего проекта, а не «универсально», поэтому новичку не нужно неделями погружать ИИ в стек, соглашения и инструменты — правила и навыки сохраняются в проекте и переиспользуются всей командой. Это снижает порог входа в незнакомую кодовую базу, д

👍2👌1👏1🔥1

22 Jun 2026, 09:16 UTC279 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

💻 Вайб-кодинг на корпоративном контроле: как превращать хаос генерации в инженерную дисциплину Приглашаем вас на совместный вебинар Veai и компании ITFB Group, посвящённый практике контролируемого применения ИИ в разработке. 🗓 Когда: 24 июня, 11:00 ☝️Участие бесплатное → нужна регистрация ❓ Ключевой вопрос: как использовать скорость вайб-кодинга, но при этом не допустить падения качества, потери управляемости и ри

👍3👌1👏1

15 Jun 2026, 11:24 UTC241 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Наша программа курсов по ИИ: как бизнесу готовить специалистов под реальные задачи В АГТУ ВШН завершился цикл лекций и практических занятий по искусственному интеллекту. Для нас это не просто образовательная инициатива, а практический формат, который помогает соединять университетскую подготовку с реальными задачами бизнеса. Участниками программы стали студенты направлений «Программная инженерия», «Автоматизация те

👍2🔥2🏆1👌1

3 Jun 2026, 13:01 UTC309 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Veai 5.11: SAST становится частью рабочего процесса разработки ☝️«Ключевая ценность для инженерных команд — меньше разрыва между сигналом о проблеме безопасности и исправлением…» Разработчик работает в привычной IDE, а агент опирается на факты проекта: структуру кода, зависимости, граф вызовов, конфигурации запуска и контекст найденной уязвимости. Что ещё вошло в Veai 5.11 – запуск тестов и сборки через IDE в Rider

👌1👍1🔥1🤝1

1 Jun 2026, 08:43 UTC314 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🎙AI Dev Podcast #4 / Как AI-агенты убивают Jira и меняют управление проектами / Авенир Воронов Как управлять командой, если код теперь пишут нейросети? Зачем нужны Jira и task-трекеры, когда постановка задачи занимает больше времени, чем её исполнение? И почему ваша следующая зарплата будет зависеть не от количества строк кода, а от умения «дружить» с LLM? В новом выпуске AI Dev Podcast мы разбираем горячую тему

🔥2👌1👍1👏1

27 May 2026, 14:19 UTC302 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @russoft_associationVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

27 May 2026, 09:04 UTC272 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @russoft_association

✈️ Компания Veai в спецпроекте Пульс российского ИТ 2.0 🔍 Дмитрий Вяткин, директор по продажам Veai, рассказал о ключевых факторах конкурентоспособности ИТ-компаний и роли технологической независимости: «Ключевым фактором сегодня становится скорость изменений, которые компании способны внедрять в единицу времени. Число разработчиков уже не является главным преимуществом — важнее скорость адаптации продуктов, регуля

👍4🏆1👌1

5 May 2026, 14:59 UTC369 views15 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ai_factoryPhoto

Наш сегодняшний пост - редкость. Мы не будем рассказывать о каком-либо внедрении. Сегодня поговорим о трендах и о том как наиболее вероятно будет выглядеть будущее через 3-5 лет. Мы взяли интервью у Владислава Кудинова - CTO компании VEAI. Он не только находится в самом сердце компании, предлагающей решения для ускорения современного кодинга. Но еще подписан на 100+ коллег-конкурентов со всего мира и мониторит, куда

🔥8👍42👌1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Veaicode. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Veai - управляемый AI в разработкe” (@Veaicode), 231 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Veaicode.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.