Channel
@VaultyANN_new
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
976subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001489373648 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @VaultyANN_new |
| Description | New ANN channel. Chat with us here: https://t.me/vaultychat_new Follow us here as well: https://twitter.com/VaultyFi2 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/VaultyANN_new |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 976 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:36 | 976 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 31 December 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 January 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
3 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤔 | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2021 to 24 January 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Why Should You Look into NFTs? 🖼️ NFTs have been a buzzword in the blockchain space.You already know they represent digital items as well as physical items. It has the potential to appreciate its value in the long run. Plus, ownership is trackable and you get the chance to learn more about blockchain. Do you have another reason why we should use NFTs? Now, tell us!. 😍 ♻️ Spread the Word: https://twitter.com/Vault…
💰NFT staking is one of the avenues to potentially earn Holders lock their NFTs in staking platforms to earn rewards. That way, you aren’t selling your NFT, but still have potential to earn passively. NFT staking might generate yield, but it depends on the platform. 👉 Platforms like Vaulty allow users to enjoy the full benefits of NFT staking. Why don’t you try NFT staking today? 🌐 Follow us to know more about Va…
Merry Christmas everyone! 🎅 Wish you all a holiday season full of happiness, joy, and crypto gems in bag!🎁🎄
💭 How Can You Stake an NFT on Vaulty? 🤑 Earning NFT rewards on Vaulty is straightforward. All you have to do is get $VLTY and stake in the NFT pool. 👉 Receive $LANTTI, which you can exchange for NFTs. Stake your Vaulty NFT if you want to earn more. That’s it. Isn’t that simple? Coming soon. 🌐 Follow us to know more about Vaulty ! Website | Twitter | Telegram | Announcement | Medium |
NFT sales in August dipped to $1.1 billion 🫡 One year earlier, it peaked at $6.2 billion. Looking at the downturn, it’s certain the NFT hype is over. But, should this be a cause for alarm? NO! 🙅♂ The downturn only means that NFTs will adopt more use cases and the bull will come. NFTs are just getting started 📈
NFTs have taken the world by storm since they emerged 🚀 So, how do you mint an NFT? First, choose the item you want to turn into an NFT. You must own the intellectual property. Second, choose the blockchain⛓️ Additionally, set up your digital wallet and fund it with some crypto. Furthermore, select the NFT marketplace that suits your NFT. Finally, upload your file to mint and set a price. Minting an NFT can be fun…
🚜Yield Farming and Staking are two BIG THINGS. If you love flexibility and want a lucrative APY, there's one that suits you. 🤑 If you want to earn with minimal risks and without being active, one is also a better option. Check it out: https://link.medium.com/CSmBb1cyMub 🌐 Follow us to know more about Vaulty ! Website | Twitter | Telegram | Announcement | Medium |
Happy Bitcoin Whitepaper Day 🎉 On this very day 14 years ago, the Bitcoin whitepaper came into existence. With it came the seeds to building the decentralized world. Thank you Satoshi, whoever you are. We will continue in this mission to BUIDLing a better future! 🚀
🧑🌾 If you wanna earn with your crypto, then you have to explore Yield Farming. 🤑 Automating the process brings immense returns with Vaulty. Are you craving for speedy operations, optimized yield and more, then this article is for you 👇 https://medium.com/@Vaulty.fi/how-vaulty-yield-aggregator-works-87f408071a97. 🌐 Follow us to know more about Vaulty ! Website | Twitter | Telegram | Announcement | Medium |
🤔3
🤜 There's a competition for attention between CeFi and DeFi. Both have strong appeals to crypto enthusiasts. 💡But the benefits of one outweighs the other. 👉Check it out: https://medium.com/@Vaulty.fi/comparing-defi-yield-to-cefi-yield-which-is-better-f903740a9b43 🌐 Follow us to know more about Vaulty ! Website | Twitter | Telegram | Announcement | Medium |
🤩 Vaulty is Back, Faultless and Ready to Thrive Again! Vaulty, the powerful yield aggregator that adds DeFi and NFT staking is back with bang! 🌐 The decentralized protocol has some new exciting features in its sleeves to unveil. 👀 Should we go straight to tell you what they are? Not yet! Keep your eyes glued and WATCH THIS SPACE! 🔃 Spread the Word: https://twitter.com/VaultyFi2/status/1582738210634940417 🌐 Follo…
Educational Series: What are NFTs? Things To Know Before You Buy NFTs 📚Read here : https://medium.com/@Vaulty.fi/what-are-nfts-things-to-know-before-you-buy-nfts-641019b94f33 🔃 Spread the Word : https://twitter.com/VaultyFi2/status/1548265378769354752 🌐 Follow us to know more about Vaulty ! Website | Twitter | Telegram | Announcement | Medium |
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @VaultyANN_new. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 794,905 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@VaultyANN_new named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Vaulty Finance ANN (Official)” (@VaultyANN_new), 976 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VaultyANN_new.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.