Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

лаборатория по производству наркотиков

@Valer1exx

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

123subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002456717997
TypeChannel
Username@Valer1exx
Descriptionесли вы сюда зашли, то поздравляю, в подарок получаете мозгоёбку не только в виде артов анон: http://t.me/anonaskbot?start=q2vnm
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/Valer1exx

Growth

1211231227 August 2026 — 121 subscribers7 August 2026 — 123 subscribers9 August 2026 — 123 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 2 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 121–123 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 03:17123no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:22123+2
7 Aug 2026, 05:16121first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 11 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
64.0%
avg views ÷ 123 subscribers
Avg views / post
78.7
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held17 (11 April 20268 August 2026)
Views total236
Reactions total28
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 03:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
67
Videos
1
Links
4

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

286 reactions across 17 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52062716400941453924716.4%
custom 52624900303995811874616.1%
🕊4315.0%
custom 5229176060733588505279.44%
269.09%
custom 5309789057826463748258.74%
custom 5206592809158608037238.04%
custom 5474301895994546214206.99%
🔥124.20%
custom 532595793465864498441.40%
👎41.40%
👻31.05%
custom 526054442739435693920.699%
custom 519752882614124524910.35%
🆒10.35%
🖕10.35%
😨10.35%

Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 286reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 11 April 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Valer1exx. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 April 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 13:37 UTC42 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

чисто в теории, кто-то будет слушать мой многострадальный бред, или все уже это исчадие ада в архив закинули? (ну мне лень рисовать, простите🤕)

🕊3

8 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC59 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

me core(буду пропускать учёбу ради игрулек): спустя столько лет рисования я наконец понял, как же мне похуй на анатомию

custom 53097890578264637487🕊1

29 Jul 2026, 14:10 UTC135 views17 reactions3 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

я больше не буду рисовать

🔥8custom 54743018959945462145🕊3custom 53097890578264637481

25 Jun 2026, 07:28 UTC339 views22 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

мне похуй, если из их фанатов только я, подруга и моя кошка

custom 530978905782646374812🕊6custom 52291760607335885053🆒1

13 Jun 2026, 13:38 UTC354 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

фух, теперь можно и пропасть

custom 54743018959945462149custom 52291760607335885054custom 53097890578264637484🕊1

8 Jun 2026, 13:08 UTC304 views26 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

я ебал, спасибо за внимание

13custom 54743018959945462146custom 52291760607335885054🔥1🕊1custom 53097890578264637481

30 May 2026, 11:47 UTC316 views26 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 520627164009414539214custom 52624900303995811877👎21🕊1custom 52605444273943569391

29 May 2026, 15:34 UTC281 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ну ладно, получилось почти так, как я задумывал

5custom 52624900303995811875👻3🕊3

28 May 2026, 08:55 UTC269 views20 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ну ладно, раз в год можно и геншин нарисовать

custom 520659280915860803710🔥32👎2🕊1🖕1😨1

15 May 2026, 14:42 UTC324 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

заберите у меня телефон, чтобы я не рисовал больше

custom 526249003039958118774custom 52291760607335885054custom 52062716400941453923🕊1

11 May 2026, 08:33 UTC322 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

а может мне пора перестать только скетчи и арты ебашить... да не, бред какой-то

custom 526249003039958118710🕊1

10 May 2026, 08:59 UTC319 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

kill me plz ебучая мания перерисовывать старые арты, я её обожаю

custom 52062716400941453929🕊1custom 53259579346586449841

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Valer1exx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 736,654 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“лаборатория по производству наркотиков” (@Valer1exx), 123 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Valer1exx.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.