Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌M‌𝗈𝗈𝗇 𝖪𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗌! .ཋྀུ۪ ׄ

@Valencweb

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

68subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002018502642
TypeChannel
Username@Valencweb
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Valencweb

Growth

64686611 Aug 2026, 06:02 — 64 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 06:15 — 64 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 00:12 — 68 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 06:0212 Aug 2026, 00:12
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 63–69 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 00:1268+4
11 Aug 2026, 06:1564no change
11 Aug 2026, 06:0264first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
255.7%
avg views ÷ 68 subscribers
Avg views / post
174
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held16 (3 August 202610 August 2026)
Views total2,434
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 06:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
16s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 22:22 UTC13 viewsread 11 August 2026

میذارمش توی واچ لیستم حتما ببینمشش

10 Aug 2026, 22:22 UTC13 viewsread 11 August 2026

Awww خیلی ممنونم خسته نباشی نازی 🤍 :33

10 Aug 2026, 22:17 UTC11 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @nabirxVideo

⠀ ⠀♡̩͙ㅤּㅤ Never Ending Summerㅤ‎ ‎˳ ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ⎯✦ دیلیت خیلی پاک و شیک و مرتبه انگار بوی تمیزی میده و این من رو یاد سریال "تابستان تمام نشدنی" میندازه .

10 Aug 2026, 16:44 UTCviews —

‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌M‌𝗈𝗈𝗇 𝖪𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗌! .ཋྀུ۪ ׄ pinned a photo

10 Aug 2026, 16:44 UTC194 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Bingo bingo?! Forward this message and I'll give you an kpop tin case and an concert outfit . ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁ ⟡ ݁ Please tell me your fav color , idol name and your fav kpop group Limite: 20:16

9 Aug 2026, 19:34 UTC39 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @nabirx

‌ ʿ ᥴ𝗁ᥲ𝗅𝗅ᥱ𝗇𝗀ᥱ ୨୧ ﹙⩩ این پیام رو فوروراد کنید با توجه به وایب دیلیتون با یک ادیت بگم کدوم سیدراما هستید و چرا ﹚ دوست داشتید جوین هم بشید 3:

9 Aug 2026, 18:54 UTCviews —

‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌M‌𝗈𝗈𝗇 𝖪𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗌! .ཋྀུ۪ ׄ pinned «🤍 .໒ྀི»

5 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC124 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ﹙ ♡ ﹚͏ㅤ

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @Valencweb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 432,609 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌M‌𝗈𝗈𝗇 𝖪𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗌! .ཋྀུ۪ ׄ” (@Valencweb), 68 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Valencweb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.