🤖 LA PRIMERA PELÍCULA HECHA ÍNTEGRAMENTE CON IA Hell Grind, así se llama, la primera película larga, hecha íntegramente con la IA Higgsfield. Duración: 1 hora 35 minutos Coste: $500.000 Se estrenó en el mercado de Cannes, marcando un verdadero cambio en la creación de contenido. Los creadores han compartido abiertamente todas las indicaciones y recursos de forma gratuita, permitiendo que cualquiera aprenda sobre l…

Channel
Valdic Tech : Tecnología | Privacidad y Seguridad Digital
@ValdicTech
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
73subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002306541335 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @ValdicLife @ValdicTech |
| Description | Te ayudo a usar tu tecnología sin que ella te use a ti. ✅ Mucho más, en YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@valdictech Aprende a recuperar tu vida digital sin poner en peligro tus datos. También noticias sobre tecnología e IA. |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ValdicTech |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 73 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 73 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 73 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 12 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 102.0%
- avg views ÷ 73 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 74.4
- 9 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 4.84%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 9
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (12 May 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 670 |
| Reactions total | 32 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 22:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 28
- Videos
- 16
- Links
- 72
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 20m 53s
- Average length
- 2m 59s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
64 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 16 | 25.0% | |
| 🤯 | 13 | 20.3% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 14.1% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 14.1% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 9.38% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 4.69% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 3.13% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 3.13% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 1.56% | |
| 👨💻 | 1 | 1.56% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 1.56% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 1.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 May 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🔴 REPORTES DE USUARIOS DE TODO EL MUNDO: WHATSAPP TE BLOQUEA SIN AVISO. 👉📱@NotiMundoyVzla 👈
🔥2❤1🏆1🙏1
🧐 EL PLAN PARA VIGILAR TUS MENSAJES: CHAT CONTROL Un tema que tenía pendiente tratar desde hace tiempo, pero como está en constante evolución, quería esperar a tenerlo todo más claro y... ¡Ahora ha sido el momento! Este vídeo es el único que necesitas para: ✅ Entender qué es Chat Control ✅ ¿Cómo empezó todo? ✅ Cómo engañan en las votaciones del parlamento ✅ ¿Por qué debería preocuparte? ✅ ¿Qué apps están afectadas…
❤1
Si queréis ir a mi TikTok y mirar a quién sigo, igual encontráis a algún famoso más por ahí 😂 Aun me quedan 1900 cuentas por quitar. Si encontráis a alguien interesante, dejadlo en comentarios 😂 Que sepáis que todos los que están ahí, compran seguidores 🖕
❤1
🧐 ¿ME HACKEARON TIKTOK? El otro día entré en TikTok, apenas entro si no es para subir alguno de los shorts que subo a YouTube. Y me sorprendí al ver que YO estaba siguiendo a más de 2600 cuentas (en la imagen hay 2095 porque estuve media hora dándole al botón de "Dejar de seguir" 🥵)... La cuestión es, ¿Quién le ha dado a seguir a 2600 cuentas cuando yo no suelo seguir a nadie? No sigo a nadie porque no uso TikTok m…
🤯4❤1
😡 ES HORA DE PREPARARNOS, ¿NO CREES? 💪 Sígueme en @ValdicTech para aprender más sobre privacidad y seguridad. 👀 Por cierto: ¿Será este uno de los participantes del último concurso para creadores de contenido de Telegram? Ya se hizo viral y todavía no han anunciado ni a los participantes. ✅ @ValdicGram - Aprende todo sobre Telegram 😮
👍2❤1
✍️ NUEVO ENFOQUE En octubre de 2025 este canal, que siempre ha sido mi segundo canal en YouTube, cambió de "Valdic Life" (un canal generalista de todo un poco) a "Valdic Tech". Allí os anunciaba que pasaría a enfocarme más en la tecnología, hardware, software, unboxings, IA, etc. Pero, de nuevo, "el que mucho abarca poco aprieta". Y me estoy dando cuenta de que publicar vídeos y cosas de temáticas tan dispares (den…
❤2👍2🔥2
Un ejemplo tonto hecho en 2 minutos, de lo que se puede hacer con la IA de Google. Usando solo una foto de mi avatar, que ni siquiera está en esa postura ni en ese escenario. Sin suscripción tienes 50 puntos diarios, que tampoco está nada mal. Aquí te conté cómo conseguir la suscripción PRO por 9 o 10€ anuales. #ia@valdictech @valdictech ✅ | Suscríbete en YouTube
👏4🤯2❤1
🤫 ¿TE CUENTO UN SECRETO? Hace poco se me caducaron mis suscripciones a las IA que suelo utilizar para crear contenido. Buscando alternativas encontré a un tipo en Telegram que vendía suscripciones para Google AI Pro por solo 45€ anuales. Teniendo en cuenta que esa suscripción cuesta 21,99€ al mes, me pareció un precio cojonudo. Así que le pagué esos 45€ tan feliz. 🧐 Fijándome en los detalles de varias cosas, tanto …
😱3❤1
La verdad es que da que pensar... ¿Tú vas a jugar a GTA VI? Yo soy de PC, así que me toca esperarme un montón más desde que salga para consolas... 🤷♂️ #videojuegos@valdictech @valdictech ✅ | Suscríbete en YouTube
🔥3👏1👨💻1🥰1
📱 HAZ MINIATURAS SIN SALIR DE YOUTUBE 🤯 Llevo ya unos meses haciendo las miniaturas de mis vídeos de YouTube dentro del mismo YouTube con "Ask Studio", la IA integrada en YouTube y con unos resultados sorprendentes. Una vez has subido un vídeo a tu canal, aunque no esté publicado, Ask Studio puede meterse dentro del vídeo, escoger los mejores frames, objetos, personajes, caras, lo que sea, y crearte una miniatura c…
👏3🤯2
🤷♂️ LO QUE PASA CUANDO COMPRAS SEGUIDORES / VISTAS / LIKES... Esto es lo que pasa cuando compras paquetes de seguidores, vistas o likes en las diferentes páginas dedicadas a esas cosas. ¿Realmente creías que gente real te seguía o veía tus publicaciones? #redessociales@valdictech @valdictech ✅ | Suscríbete en YouTube
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ValdicTech. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,055,315 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Valdic Tech : Tecnología | Privacidad y Seguridad Digital” (@ValdicTech), 73 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ValdicTech.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.