Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 4 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 42 days, net +19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 81–106 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Oct 2026, 18:59
103
+3
21 Oct 2026, 14:01
100
+4
14 Oct 2026, 00:40
96
+5
4 Oct 2026, 06:54
91
+6
18 Sept 2026, 17:00
85
+1
17 Sept 2026, 07:22
84
no change
17 Sept 2026, 06:47
84
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 12 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 40s
Average length
25s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
371 reactions across 20 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 8.63% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5969965830899768561
32
8.63%
custom 5899845060953905906
31
8.36%
custom 5847975879086449010
30
8.09%
custom 5866023524937769602
27
7.28%
custom 5916021874885663762
27
7.28%
custom 6032989309122910003
27
7.28%
custom 5780911270429466363
23
6.20%
custom 5848117398258852899
20
5.39%
custom 5848472106722925497
20
5.39%
custom 5953856465134427406
19
5.12%
custom 6037376832964140961
19
5.12%
custom 5868530454398769882
16
4.31%
custom 5969710688367548912
16
4.31%
custom 5969535616910629027
14
3.77%
custom 5897633870056004591
13
3.50%
custom 5909067747307822586
8
2.16%
custom 5848132185831252218
6
1.62%
custom 5190740153588551099
5
1.35%
custom 5774007501343169199
5
1.35%
custom 5372978746988976757
4
1.08%
5 further kinds
9
2.43%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 371 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 September 2026 to 17 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @V_i_b_e_s2. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 September 2026 to 17 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
تعلمت ألا اثق في الناس كثيراً، وتعلمت أيضاً ألا أُصدق أقوالهم بل أرُاقب أفعالهم. تعلمت أيضاً أن الجميع قادر على خداعك، وأن الآخرين حتى من تعتقد بأنك تعرفهم جيداً، من المُستحيل أن تعرفهم بشكل تام
بتمنى في يوم من الأيام ما أندمش على كل الحب اللي اديته لناس في حياتي، لأني عمري ما حبيت غير بصدق، وما قصّرتش في إحساس ولا نية، كنت دايمًا أدي من قلبي من غير حساب، وأسامح وأعدّي عشان خاطر الود، يمكن اللي مشيوا ما قدّروش، ويمكن الوجع كان أكبر من الاستحمال، بس الحب عمره ما كان غلط، الغلط كان في اللي ما عرفش قيمته، وأنا فخورة بنفسي إني حبيت بضمير، وسيبت أثر حلو، حتى لو النهاية ما كانتش زي ما تمنيت🤩
مفيش راحة في الدنيا تساوي إن ربنا يفكّ ضيقتك بلُطفه هو وتدبيره هو، بدون تفضُّل من حد ولا عشم في مخلوق، ومن غير ما تحتاج لجميل حد، أو خاطرك يتخدش قدّام بشر..
يا رب، لا تجعل حاجتنا إلا إليك، ولا تجعل لأحدٍ علينا مِنّة.🖤
أنا مش ندمـانه إنِ كُنت ف يوم من الأيام حنينه معَ اللي كُنت بحبهم وبقدملهم حُب صادق وكُل حاجه جميله كان نفسي إنها تتقدملي .. بالعكس مبسوطه انِي كُنت مصدر أمان وحُب ليهم بس اتعلمت بردوا إن مش كُل الناس تستاهل مشاعرك الصادقه دي..❤
اعتقد اكتر حاجه تستاهل ان الانسان يسعى ليها و يبذل مجهوده عشان يوصلها هيا انك تكون انسان كويس .. شخص سَوىّ .. معترف باخطائك و بتسعى ديماً انك تصلحها..
انجازك الاهم في الحياه هو انك تبقي بني ادم كويس..💗
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @V_i_b_e_s2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝑭𝒊𝒄𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏" الليل” (@V_i_b_e_s2), 103 subscribers as measured 28 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/V_i_b_e_s2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
